Black hole mass estimations

Limitations and uncertainties

Marianne Vestergaard, Kelly D. Denney, Xiaohui Fan, Jens Juel Jensen, Brandon C. Kelly, Patrick S. Osmer, Bradley M. Peterson, Christina A. Tremonti

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

Mass scaling relations are a powerful tool for estimating virial masses of the central supermassive black holes that power distant quasars and active galactic nuclei owing in part to the relative ease with which they can be applied to large catalogs of spectral data. There is a large suite of mass scaling relations available in the literature, based on the three main broad emission lines: Hβ , Mg II, and C IV. We summarize some of the issues to be aware of when choosing and using these relations, including those of special interest to Narrow Line Seyfert 1 galaxy studies. In particular, we advocate using high-quality spectral data and multiple emission lines for the most accurate mass estimates. In the literature certain scaling relations, including that based on C IV, are claimed to be unreliable. We show results indicating that all of the three broad lines (Hβ , Mg II, or C IV) exhibit issues suggesting that none of them are more accurate mass estimators than the others. Only by using as many broad lines as possible can we hope to even out the slight deviations introduced by the individual lines. Denney et al. (these proceedings) provide convincing evidence against the use of low-quality data for mass estimates. We present additional evidence, including extensive simulations, that low-quality data is most likely to bias our mass estimates which can be quite significant for narrow-lined sources like NLS1s. Finally, we present results based on Bayesian statistical analysis of the SDSS DR3 luminosity and mass function sample which shows that the peak of the estimated Eddington luminosity ratios (LBOL/LEdd) distribution will be overestimated and the distribution width underestimated unless the intrinsic uncertainties in the mass estimates and survey incompleteness are accounted for.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalProceedings of Science
Volume126
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011
Event2011 Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies and their Place in the Universe, NLS1 2011 - Milano, Italy
Duration: Apr 4 2011Apr 6 2011

Fingerprint

estimates
scaling
luminosity
estimators
active galactic nuclei
statistical analysis
quasars
catalogs
congressional reports
estimating
galaxies
deviation
simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Vestergaard, M., Denney, K. D., Fan, X., Jensen, J. J., Kelly, B. C., Osmer, P. S., ... Tremonti, C. A. (2011). Black hole mass estimations: Limitations and uncertainties. Proceedings of Science, 126.

Black hole mass estimations : Limitations and uncertainties. / Vestergaard, Marianne; Denney, Kelly D.; Fan, Xiaohui; Jensen, Jens Juel; Kelly, Brandon C.; Osmer, Patrick S.; Peterson, Bradley M.; Tremonti, Christina A.

In: Proceedings of Science, Vol. 126, 01.01.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Vestergaard, M, Denney, KD, Fan, X, Jensen, JJ, Kelly, BC, Osmer, PS, Peterson, BM & Tremonti, CA 2011, 'Black hole mass estimations: Limitations and uncertainties', Proceedings of Science, vol. 126.
Vestergaard M, Denney KD, Fan X, Jensen JJ, Kelly BC, Osmer PS et al. Black hole mass estimations: Limitations and uncertainties. Proceedings of Science. 2011 Jan 1;126.
Vestergaard, Marianne ; Denney, Kelly D. ; Fan, Xiaohui ; Jensen, Jens Juel ; Kelly, Brandon C. ; Osmer, Patrick S. ; Peterson, Bradley M. ; Tremonti, Christina A. / Black hole mass estimations : Limitations and uncertainties. In: Proceedings of Science. 2011 ; Vol. 126.
@article{7c964f636b754226aa31e446a606411a,
title = "Black hole mass estimations: Limitations and uncertainties",
abstract = "Mass scaling relations are a powerful tool for estimating virial masses of the central supermassive black holes that power distant quasars and active galactic nuclei owing in part to the relative ease with which they can be applied to large catalogs of spectral data. There is a large suite of mass scaling relations available in the literature, based on the three main broad emission lines: Hβ , Mg II, and C IV. We summarize some of the issues to be aware of when choosing and using these relations, including those of special interest to Narrow Line Seyfert 1 galaxy studies. In particular, we advocate using high-quality spectral data and multiple emission lines for the most accurate mass estimates. In the literature certain scaling relations, including that based on C IV, are claimed to be unreliable. We show results indicating that all of the three broad lines (Hβ , Mg II, or C IV) exhibit issues suggesting that none of them are more accurate mass estimators than the others. Only by using as many broad lines as possible can we hope to even out the slight deviations introduced by the individual lines. Denney et al. (these proceedings) provide convincing evidence against the use of low-quality data for mass estimates. We present additional evidence, including extensive simulations, that low-quality data is most likely to bias our mass estimates which can be quite significant for narrow-lined sources like NLS1s. Finally, we present results based on Bayesian statistical analysis of the SDSS DR3 luminosity and mass function sample which shows that the peak of the estimated Eddington luminosity ratios (LBOL/LEdd) distribution will be overestimated and the distribution width underestimated unless the intrinsic uncertainties in the mass estimates and survey incompleteness are accounted for.",
author = "Marianne Vestergaard and Denney, {Kelly D.} and Xiaohui Fan and Jensen, {Jens Juel} and Kelly, {Brandon C.} and Osmer, {Patrick S.} and Peterson, {Bradley M.} and Tremonti, {Christina A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "126",
journal = "Proceedings of Science",
issn = "1824-8039",
publisher = "Sissa Medialab Srl",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Black hole mass estimations

T2 - Limitations and uncertainties

AU - Vestergaard, Marianne

AU - Denney, Kelly D.

AU - Fan, Xiaohui

AU - Jensen, Jens Juel

AU - Kelly, Brandon C.

AU - Osmer, Patrick S.

AU - Peterson, Bradley M.

AU - Tremonti, Christina A.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Mass scaling relations are a powerful tool for estimating virial masses of the central supermassive black holes that power distant quasars and active galactic nuclei owing in part to the relative ease with which they can be applied to large catalogs of spectral data. There is a large suite of mass scaling relations available in the literature, based on the three main broad emission lines: Hβ , Mg II, and C IV. We summarize some of the issues to be aware of when choosing and using these relations, including those of special interest to Narrow Line Seyfert 1 galaxy studies. In particular, we advocate using high-quality spectral data and multiple emission lines for the most accurate mass estimates. In the literature certain scaling relations, including that based on C IV, are claimed to be unreliable. We show results indicating that all of the three broad lines (Hβ , Mg II, or C IV) exhibit issues suggesting that none of them are more accurate mass estimators than the others. Only by using as many broad lines as possible can we hope to even out the slight deviations introduced by the individual lines. Denney et al. (these proceedings) provide convincing evidence against the use of low-quality data for mass estimates. We present additional evidence, including extensive simulations, that low-quality data is most likely to bias our mass estimates which can be quite significant for narrow-lined sources like NLS1s. Finally, we present results based on Bayesian statistical analysis of the SDSS DR3 luminosity and mass function sample which shows that the peak of the estimated Eddington luminosity ratios (LBOL/LEdd) distribution will be overestimated and the distribution width underestimated unless the intrinsic uncertainties in the mass estimates and survey incompleteness are accounted for.

AB - Mass scaling relations are a powerful tool for estimating virial masses of the central supermassive black holes that power distant quasars and active galactic nuclei owing in part to the relative ease with which they can be applied to large catalogs of spectral data. There is a large suite of mass scaling relations available in the literature, based on the three main broad emission lines: Hβ , Mg II, and C IV. We summarize some of the issues to be aware of when choosing and using these relations, including those of special interest to Narrow Line Seyfert 1 galaxy studies. In particular, we advocate using high-quality spectral data and multiple emission lines for the most accurate mass estimates. In the literature certain scaling relations, including that based on C IV, are claimed to be unreliable. We show results indicating that all of the three broad lines (Hβ , Mg II, or C IV) exhibit issues suggesting that none of them are more accurate mass estimators than the others. Only by using as many broad lines as possible can we hope to even out the slight deviations introduced by the individual lines. Denney et al. (these proceedings) provide convincing evidence against the use of low-quality data for mass estimates. We present additional evidence, including extensive simulations, that low-quality data is most likely to bias our mass estimates which can be quite significant for narrow-lined sources like NLS1s. Finally, we present results based on Bayesian statistical analysis of the SDSS DR3 luminosity and mass function sample which shows that the peak of the estimated Eddington luminosity ratios (LBOL/LEdd) distribution will be overestimated and the distribution width underestimated unless the intrinsic uncertainties in the mass estimates and survey incompleteness are accounted for.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053309739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053309739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference article

VL - 126

JO - Proceedings of Science

JF - Proceedings of Science

SN - 1824-8039

ER -