Bone mineral density of American Indian and Alaska Native women compared with non-Hispanic white women: Results from the Women's Health Initiative Study

Nina S. Wampler, Zhao Chen, Clemma Jacobsen, Jeffrey A. Henderson, Barbara V. Howard, Jacques E. Rossouw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare bone mineral density (BMD) of American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women with that of non-Hispanic white women. Design: This cross-sectional study compared mean BMD between AI/AN women and a random sample of non-Hispanic white women matched on geographic region in the Women's Health Initiative Study, a prospective study of postmenopausal women. We analyzed baseline BMD measurements for the total hip, spine, and whole body from 139 AI/AN women and 1,431 non-Hispanic white women. Results: Unadjusted mean spine and whole body BMDs were not significantly different between the two races. Controlling for age, education, and hormone therapy use, adjusted mean BMD was similar by race among women who were underweight, normal, or obese. We found a significant interaction of race by body mass index on spine (P = 0.003) and whole body (P = 0.0003) BMD; thus, analyses were stratified by body mass index. Overweight AI/AN women had slightly lower adjusted mean whole body and spine BMD than overweight non-Hispanic white women (whole body: 0.97 vs 1.03 g/cm 2, P = 0.02; spine: 0.96 versus 1.03 g/cm2, P = 0.001). Among extremely obese (body mass index: ≥40.0 kg/m2) women, adjusted mean total hip BMD was higher in the AI/AN women (1.07 vs 0.97 g/cm2, respectively, P = 0.03). Conclusions: Overall, AI/AN and non-Hispanic white women had similar BMDs. This study suggests that extremely obese AI/AN women may have higher BMD at certain skeletal sites compared with extremely obese non-Hispanic white women. However, these results need to be confirmed by additional research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)536-544
Number of pages9
JournalMenopause
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

North American Indians
Women's Health
Bone Density
Spine
Body Mass Index
Alaska Natives
Pelvic Bones
Thinness

Keywords

  • Alaska Native
  • American Indian
  • Bone densitometry
  • Postmenopausal women
  • Racial differences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Bone mineral density of American Indian and Alaska Native women compared with non-Hispanic white women : Results from the Women's Health Initiative Study. / Wampler, Nina S.; Chen, Zhao; Jacobsen, Clemma; Henderson, Jeffrey A.; Howard, Barbara V.; Rossouw, Jacques E.

In: Menopause, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2005, p. 536-544.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wampler, Nina S. ; Chen, Zhao ; Jacobsen, Clemma ; Henderson, Jeffrey A. ; Howard, Barbara V. ; Rossouw, Jacques E. / Bone mineral density of American Indian and Alaska Native women compared with non-Hispanic white women : Results from the Women's Health Initiative Study. In: Menopause. 2005 ; Vol. 12, No. 5. pp. 536-544.
@article{928de22714ea481fb1954419f0307141,
title = "Bone mineral density of American Indian and Alaska Native women compared with non-Hispanic white women: Results from the Women's Health Initiative Study",
abstract = "Objective: To compare bone mineral density (BMD) of American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women with that of non-Hispanic white women. Design: This cross-sectional study compared mean BMD between AI/AN women and a random sample of non-Hispanic white women matched on geographic region in the Women's Health Initiative Study, a prospective study of postmenopausal women. We analyzed baseline BMD measurements for the total hip, spine, and whole body from 139 AI/AN women and 1,431 non-Hispanic white women. Results: Unadjusted mean spine and whole body BMDs were not significantly different between the two races. Controlling for age, education, and hormone therapy use, adjusted mean BMD was similar by race among women who were underweight, normal, or obese. We found a significant interaction of race by body mass index on spine (P = 0.003) and whole body (P = 0.0003) BMD; thus, analyses were stratified by body mass index. Overweight AI/AN women had slightly lower adjusted mean whole body and spine BMD than overweight non-Hispanic white women (whole body: 0.97 vs 1.03 g/cm 2, P = 0.02; spine: 0.96 versus 1.03 g/cm2, P = 0.001). Among extremely obese (body mass index: ≥40.0 kg/m2) women, adjusted mean total hip BMD was higher in the AI/AN women (1.07 vs 0.97 g/cm2, respectively, P = 0.03). Conclusions: Overall, AI/AN and non-Hispanic white women had similar BMDs. This study suggests that extremely obese AI/AN women may have higher BMD at certain skeletal sites compared with extremely obese non-Hispanic white women. However, these results need to be confirmed by additional research.",
keywords = "Alaska Native, American Indian, Bone densitometry, Postmenopausal women, Racial differences",
author = "Wampler, {Nina S.} and Zhao Chen and Clemma Jacobsen and Henderson, {Jeffrey A.} and Howard, {Barbara V.} and Rossouw, {Jacques E.}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1097/01.gme.0000182161.88939.f0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "536--544",
journal = "Menopause",
issn = "1072-3714",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bone mineral density of American Indian and Alaska Native women compared with non-Hispanic white women

T2 - Results from the Women's Health Initiative Study

AU - Wampler, Nina S.

AU - Chen, Zhao

AU - Jacobsen, Clemma

AU - Henderson, Jeffrey A.

AU - Howard, Barbara V.

AU - Rossouw, Jacques E.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Objective: To compare bone mineral density (BMD) of American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women with that of non-Hispanic white women. Design: This cross-sectional study compared mean BMD between AI/AN women and a random sample of non-Hispanic white women matched on geographic region in the Women's Health Initiative Study, a prospective study of postmenopausal women. We analyzed baseline BMD measurements for the total hip, spine, and whole body from 139 AI/AN women and 1,431 non-Hispanic white women. Results: Unadjusted mean spine and whole body BMDs were not significantly different between the two races. Controlling for age, education, and hormone therapy use, adjusted mean BMD was similar by race among women who were underweight, normal, or obese. We found a significant interaction of race by body mass index on spine (P = 0.003) and whole body (P = 0.0003) BMD; thus, analyses were stratified by body mass index. Overweight AI/AN women had slightly lower adjusted mean whole body and spine BMD than overweight non-Hispanic white women (whole body: 0.97 vs 1.03 g/cm 2, P = 0.02; spine: 0.96 versus 1.03 g/cm2, P = 0.001). Among extremely obese (body mass index: ≥40.0 kg/m2) women, adjusted mean total hip BMD was higher in the AI/AN women (1.07 vs 0.97 g/cm2, respectively, P = 0.03). Conclusions: Overall, AI/AN and non-Hispanic white women had similar BMDs. This study suggests that extremely obese AI/AN women may have higher BMD at certain skeletal sites compared with extremely obese non-Hispanic white women. However, these results need to be confirmed by additional research.

AB - Objective: To compare bone mineral density (BMD) of American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women with that of non-Hispanic white women. Design: This cross-sectional study compared mean BMD between AI/AN women and a random sample of non-Hispanic white women matched on geographic region in the Women's Health Initiative Study, a prospective study of postmenopausal women. We analyzed baseline BMD measurements for the total hip, spine, and whole body from 139 AI/AN women and 1,431 non-Hispanic white women. Results: Unadjusted mean spine and whole body BMDs were not significantly different between the two races. Controlling for age, education, and hormone therapy use, adjusted mean BMD was similar by race among women who were underweight, normal, or obese. We found a significant interaction of race by body mass index on spine (P = 0.003) and whole body (P = 0.0003) BMD; thus, analyses were stratified by body mass index. Overweight AI/AN women had slightly lower adjusted mean whole body and spine BMD than overweight non-Hispanic white women (whole body: 0.97 vs 1.03 g/cm 2, P = 0.02; spine: 0.96 versus 1.03 g/cm2, P = 0.001). Among extremely obese (body mass index: ≥40.0 kg/m2) women, adjusted mean total hip BMD was higher in the AI/AN women (1.07 vs 0.97 g/cm2, respectively, P = 0.03). Conclusions: Overall, AI/AN and non-Hispanic white women had similar BMDs. This study suggests that extremely obese AI/AN women may have higher BMD at certain skeletal sites compared with extremely obese non-Hispanic white women. However, these results need to be confirmed by additional research.

KW - Alaska Native

KW - American Indian

KW - Bone densitometry

KW - Postmenopausal women

KW - Racial differences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25444471256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25444471256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.gme.0000182161.88939.f0

DO - 10.1097/01.gme.0000182161.88939.f0

M3 - Article

C2 - 16145307

AN - SCOPUS:25444471256

VL - 12

SP - 536

EP - 544

JO - Menopause

JF - Menopause

SN - 1072-3714

IS - 5

ER -