Brains, Brawn, and the Evolution of Human Endurance Running Capabilities

Daniel E. Lieberman, Dennis M. Bramble, David A Raichlen, John J. Shea

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Theories about hominin evolution are often connected intimately with notions of what it is to be human. Such ideas have had a particularly strong infl uence on thinking about the defi nition and origin of the human genus (see Landau, 1993; Wood and Collard, 1999; Wood, 2009). Many, if not most scenarios for the evolution of the genus Homo emphasize the importance of quintessentially human traits such as large brains, tool-making, and complex cognition. Usually these derived features have been interpreted, explicitly or implicitly, as a suite of novel strategies that emphasize cognitive over athletic means of competing with the rest of nature (“red in tooth and claw”). Most animals compete with each other to a signifi cant extent using athletic capabilities such as strength, power, agility and speed. Obviously, humans compare poorly with other mammals, including African apes, in these characteristics: we are weak, slow, and awkward creatures. Even though male chimpanzees weigh less than a typical adult modern human, they can produce much more force, can sprint more rapidly, and are obviously more agile during locomotion (Stedman et al., 2004). Yet, although no human alive could match a chimpanzee in hand-to-hand combat, our cognitive capacities are extraordinarily better developed. Accordingly, it seems reasonable to focus on evolutionary scenarios for the genus Homo that explain the triumph of brains over brawn. Interestingly, the idea that humans are poor athletes is demonstrably wrong in one crucial respect. While humans have comparatively poor performance capabilities in terms of power and strength, we are unusually specialized endurance athletes, with surprisingly impressive aerobic performance capabilities. These capabilities are particularly remarkable for endurance running (ER), defi ned as running long-distances (>5 km) using aerobic metabolism. These capabilities, which have been reviewed in depth by Carrier (1984) and Bramble and Lieberman (2004), compare extremely well to other mammals, especially primates, in terms of several performance criteria such as speed and distance, especially in hot conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationVertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology
PublisherSpringer
Pages77-92
Number of pages16
Edition9781402099793
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Publication series

NameVertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology
Number9781402099793
ISSN (Print)1877-9077

Fingerprint

brain
mammal
cognition
locomotion
primate
tooth
metabolism
animal
athletes
Homo
sports
Pan troglodytes
hands
mammals
collard greens
speed
Pongidae
claws
teeth
Primates

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Endurance running
  • Habitat
  • Homo erectus
  • Homo habilis
  • Persistence hunting
  • Scavenging
  • Thermoregulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Palaeontology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Cite this

Lieberman, D. E., Bramble, D. M., Raichlen, D. A., & Shea, J. J. (2009). Brains, Brawn, and the Evolution of Human Endurance Running Capabilities. In Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology (9781402099793 ed., pp. 77-92). (Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology; No. 9781402099793). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9980-9_8

Brains, Brawn, and the Evolution of Human Endurance Running Capabilities. / Lieberman, Daniel E.; Bramble, Dennis M.; Raichlen, David A; Shea, John J.

Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. 9781402099793. ed. Springer, 2009. p. 77-92 (Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology; No. 9781402099793).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Lieberman, DE, Bramble, DM, Raichlen, DA & Shea, JJ 2009, Brains, Brawn, and the Evolution of Human Endurance Running Capabilities. in Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. 9781402099793 edn, Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology, no. 9781402099793, Springer, pp. 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9980-9_8
Lieberman DE, Bramble DM, Raichlen DA, Shea JJ. Brains, Brawn, and the Evolution of Human Endurance Running Capabilities. In Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. 9781402099793 ed. Springer. 2009. p. 77-92. (Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology; 9781402099793). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9980-9_8
Lieberman, Daniel E. ; Bramble, Dennis M. ; Raichlen, David A ; Shea, John J. / Brains, Brawn, and the Evolution of Human Endurance Running Capabilities. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. 9781402099793. ed. Springer, 2009. pp. 77-92 (Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology; 9781402099793).
@inbook{ede4ae48956d466b82606459868135fc,
title = "Brains, Brawn, and the Evolution of Human Endurance Running Capabilities",
abstract = "Theories about hominin evolution are often connected intimately with notions of what it is to be human. Such ideas have had a particularly strong infl uence on thinking about the defi nition and origin of the human genus (see Landau, 1993; Wood and Collard, 1999; Wood, 2009). Many, if not most scenarios for the evolution of the genus Homo emphasize the importance of quintessentially human traits such as large brains, tool-making, and complex cognition. Usually these derived features have been interpreted, explicitly or implicitly, as a suite of novel strategies that emphasize cognitive over athletic means of competing with the rest of nature (“red in tooth and claw”). Most animals compete with each other to a signifi cant extent using athletic capabilities such as strength, power, agility and speed. Obviously, humans compare poorly with other mammals, including African apes, in these characteristics: we are weak, slow, and awkward creatures. Even though male chimpanzees weigh less than a typical adult modern human, they can produce much more force, can sprint more rapidly, and are obviously more agile during locomotion (Stedman et al., 2004). Yet, although no human alive could match a chimpanzee in hand-to-hand combat, our cognitive capacities are extraordinarily better developed. Accordingly, it seems reasonable to focus on evolutionary scenarios for the genus Homo that explain the triumph of brains over brawn. Interestingly, the idea that humans are poor athletes is demonstrably wrong in one crucial respect. While humans have comparatively poor performance capabilities in terms of power and strength, we are unusually specialized endurance athletes, with surprisingly impressive aerobic performance capabilities. These capabilities are particularly remarkable for endurance running (ER), defi ned as running long-distances (>5 km) using aerobic metabolism. These capabilities, which have been reviewed in depth by Carrier (1984) and Bramble and Lieberman (2004), compare extremely well to other mammals, especially primates, in terms of several performance criteria such as speed and distance, especially in hot conditions.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Endurance running, Habitat, Homo erectus, Homo habilis, Persistence hunting, Scavenging, Thermoregulation",
author = "Lieberman, {Daniel E.} and Bramble, {Dennis M.} and Raichlen, {David A} and Shea, {John J.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4020-9980-9_8",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "9781402099793",
pages = "77--92",
booktitle = "Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology",
edition = "9781402099793",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Brains, Brawn, and the Evolution of Human Endurance Running Capabilities

AU - Lieberman, Daniel E.

AU - Bramble, Dennis M.

AU - Raichlen, David A

AU - Shea, John J.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Theories about hominin evolution are often connected intimately with notions of what it is to be human. Such ideas have had a particularly strong infl uence on thinking about the defi nition and origin of the human genus (see Landau, 1993; Wood and Collard, 1999; Wood, 2009). Many, if not most scenarios for the evolution of the genus Homo emphasize the importance of quintessentially human traits such as large brains, tool-making, and complex cognition. Usually these derived features have been interpreted, explicitly or implicitly, as a suite of novel strategies that emphasize cognitive over athletic means of competing with the rest of nature (“red in tooth and claw”). Most animals compete with each other to a signifi cant extent using athletic capabilities such as strength, power, agility and speed. Obviously, humans compare poorly with other mammals, including African apes, in these characteristics: we are weak, slow, and awkward creatures. Even though male chimpanzees weigh less than a typical adult modern human, they can produce much more force, can sprint more rapidly, and are obviously more agile during locomotion (Stedman et al., 2004). Yet, although no human alive could match a chimpanzee in hand-to-hand combat, our cognitive capacities are extraordinarily better developed. Accordingly, it seems reasonable to focus on evolutionary scenarios for the genus Homo that explain the triumph of brains over brawn. Interestingly, the idea that humans are poor athletes is demonstrably wrong in one crucial respect. While humans have comparatively poor performance capabilities in terms of power and strength, we are unusually specialized endurance athletes, with surprisingly impressive aerobic performance capabilities. These capabilities are particularly remarkable for endurance running (ER), defi ned as running long-distances (>5 km) using aerobic metabolism. These capabilities, which have been reviewed in depth by Carrier (1984) and Bramble and Lieberman (2004), compare extremely well to other mammals, especially primates, in terms of several performance criteria such as speed and distance, especially in hot conditions.

AB - Theories about hominin evolution are often connected intimately with notions of what it is to be human. Such ideas have had a particularly strong infl uence on thinking about the defi nition and origin of the human genus (see Landau, 1993; Wood and Collard, 1999; Wood, 2009). Many, if not most scenarios for the evolution of the genus Homo emphasize the importance of quintessentially human traits such as large brains, tool-making, and complex cognition. Usually these derived features have been interpreted, explicitly or implicitly, as a suite of novel strategies that emphasize cognitive over athletic means of competing with the rest of nature (“red in tooth and claw”). Most animals compete with each other to a signifi cant extent using athletic capabilities such as strength, power, agility and speed. Obviously, humans compare poorly with other mammals, including African apes, in these characteristics: we are weak, slow, and awkward creatures. Even though male chimpanzees weigh less than a typical adult modern human, they can produce much more force, can sprint more rapidly, and are obviously more agile during locomotion (Stedman et al., 2004). Yet, although no human alive could match a chimpanzee in hand-to-hand combat, our cognitive capacities are extraordinarily better developed. Accordingly, it seems reasonable to focus on evolutionary scenarios for the genus Homo that explain the triumph of brains over brawn. Interestingly, the idea that humans are poor athletes is demonstrably wrong in one crucial respect. While humans have comparatively poor performance capabilities in terms of power and strength, we are unusually specialized endurance athletes, with surprisingly impressive aerobic performance capabilities. These capabilities are particularly remarkable for endurance running (ER), defi ned as running long-distances (>5 km) using aerobic metabolism. These capabilities, which have been reviewed in depth by Carrier (1984) and Bramble and Lieberman (2004), compare extremely well to other mammals, especially primates, in terms of several performance criteria such as speed and distance, especially in hot conditions.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Endurance running

KW - Habitat

KW - Homo erectus

KW - Homo habilis

KW - Persistence hunting

KW - Scavenging

KW - Thermoregulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016249397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016249397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4020-9980-9_8

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4020-9980-9_8

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85016249397

T3 - Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology

SP - 77

EP - 92

BT - Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology

PB - Springer

ER -