Brazil's clean development mechanism governance in the context of Brazil's historical environment-development discourses

John C. Cole, Diana Liverman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyzes how Brazil governs the Clean Development Mechanism in the context of the nation's historical approaches to development. We examine how the Brazilian Interministerial Commission on Global Climate Change reviews and approves the sustainable development aspects of proposed Brazilian projects by comparing the Commission's balancing of competing objectives to the balancing of developmentalist and socioenvironmental priorities during Brazil's 1964-1985 military dictatorship, the ensuing period surrounding Brazil's 1985 return to democracy, and thereafter. In each case, development-related priorities are handled through substantive measures, while social and environmental concerns are addressed through procedural mechanisms, including participation. We consider the future of Brazilian climate governance, both domestically and in the context of proposed post-2012 multilateral governance regimes for the Clean Development Mechanism (or any successor mechanism).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-160
Number of pages16
JournalCarbon Management
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

development discourse
clean development mechanism
democracy
global climate
sustainable development
climate change
climate
project
participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Brazil's clean development mechanism governance in the context of Brazil's historical environment-development discourses. / Cole, John C.; Liverman, Diana.

In: Carbon Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, 04.2011, p. 145-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a5980e77ea2542248f7f02475346906c,
title = "Brazil's clean development mechanism governance in the context of Brazil's historical environment-development discourses",
abstract = "This article analyzes how Brazil governs the Clean Development Mechanism in the context of the nation's historical approaches to development. We examine how the Brazilian Interministerial Commission on Global Climate Change reviews and approves the sustainable development aspects of proposed Brazilian projects by comparing the Commission's balancing of competing objectives to the balancing of developmentalist and socioenvironmental priorities during Brazil's 1964-1985 military dictatorship, the ensuing period surrounding Brazil's 1985 return to democracy, and thereafter. In each case, development-related priorities are handled through substantive measures, while social and environmental concerns are addressed through procedural mechanisms, including participation. We consider the future of Brazilian climate governance, both domestically and in the context of proposed post-2012 multilateral governance regimes for the Clean Development Mechanism (or any successor mechanism).",
author = "Cole, {John C.} and Diana Liverman",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.4155/cmt.11.11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "145--160",
journal = "Carbon Management",
issn = "1758-3004",
publisher = "Future Science",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brazil's clean development mechanism governance in the context of Brazil's historical environment-development discourses

AU - Cole, John C.

AU - Liverman, Diana

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - This article analyzes how Brazil governs the Clean Development Mechanism in the context of the nation's historical approaches to development. We examine how the Brazilian Interministerial Commission on Global Climate Change reviews and approves the sustainable development aspects of proposed Brazilian projects by comparing the Commission's balancing of competing objectives to the balancing of developmentalist and socioenvironmental priorities during Brazil's 1964-1985 military dictatorship, the ensuing period surrounding Brazil's 1985 return to democracy, and thereafter. In each case, development-related priorities are handled through substantive measures, while social and environmental concerns are addressed through procedural mechanisms, including participation. We consider the future of Brazilian climate governance, both domestically and in the context of proposed post-2012 multilateral governance regimes for the Clean Development Mechanism (or any successor mechanism).

AB - This article analyzes how Brazil governs the Clean Development Mechanism in the context of the nation's historical approaches to development. We examine how the Brazilian Interministerial Commission on Global Climate Change reviews and approves the sustainable development aspects of proposed Brazilian projects by comparing the Commission's balancing of competing objectives to the balancing of developmentalist and socioenvironmental priorities during Brazil's 1964-1985 military dictatorship, the ensuing period surrounding Brazil's 1985 return to democracy, and thereafter. In each case, development-related priorities are handled through substantive measures, while social and environmental concerns are addressed through procedural mechanisms, including participation. We consider the future of Brazilian climate governance, both domestically and in the context of proposed post-2012 multilateral governance regimes for the Clean Development Mechanism (or any successor mechanism).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953848238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953848238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4155/cmt.11.11

DO - 10.4155/cmt.11.11

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79953848238

VL - 2

SP - 145

EP - 160

JO - Carbon Management

JF - Carbon Management

SN - 1758-3004

IS - 2

ER -