Bridging the gap between research and practice by strengthening academic-community partnerships for violence research

Nicole P Yuan, Tommi L. Gaines, Lisa M. Jones, Lindsey M. Rodriguez, Nicky Hamilton, Kelly Kinnish

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This commentary seeks to highlight the benefits of community-based participatory research (CBPR) and promote its use in the violence field. Community perspectives remain underrepresented in the CBPR literature despite the emphasis on equitable partnerships and shared ownership in the research process. Method: Informal interviews were conducted with 10 community partners to understand their perspectives on using and participating in research. Results: Several recommendations for strengthening academic-community research partnerships emerged from the community partners' responses. They were: (a) conduct research that is useful to communities, with a focus on evidence-based practices and cost-benefit analyses; (b) involve community partners early in the development of research questions to ensure that local needs are addressed; (c) engage in frequent and open communication and maintain transparency about research goals and roles and responsibilities of each partner; (d) provide benefits to communities during the research process to promote professional development and build capacity; and (e) disseminate findings quickly, using outlets accessible to communities, and translate into strategies for practice. Conclusion: Although the recommendations require significant investments of time and resources by all partners, use of CBPR can contribute to increased development of innovative and sustainable violence prevention programs, services, and policies that are uniquely informed by scientific evidence and community expertise. By emphasizing partnerships with communities, CBPR helps to reduce the gap between research and practice and facilitates the inclusion of community strengths and resilience as valuable components of violence prevention and intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-33
Number of pages7
JournalPsychology of Violence
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Violence
violence
Community-Based Participatory Research
Research
community
research process
Ownership
Evidence-Based Practice
Conservation of Natural Resources
community research
Cost-Benefit Analysis
resilience
transparency
Interviews
evidence
expertise
inclusion

Keywords

  • Academic-community partnerships
  • Community-based participatory research
  • Interpersonal violence
  • Prevention
  • Resilience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Bridging the gap between research and practice by strengthening academic-community partnerships for violence research. / Yuan, Nicole P; Gaines, Tommi L.; Jones, Lisa M.; Rodriguez, Lindsey M.; Hamilton, Nicky; Kinnish, Kelly.

In: Psychology of Violence, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 27-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yuan, Nicole P ; Gaines, Tommi L. ; Jones, Lisa M. ; Rodriguez, Lindsey M. ; Hamilton, Nicky ; Kinnish, Kelly. / Bridging the gap between research and practice by strengthening academic-community partnerships for violence research. In: Psychology of Violence. 2016 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 27-33.
@article{29ee06d10d2e4a3ba86e59d94ea20c28,
title = "Bridging the gap between research and practice by strengthening academic-community partnerships for violence research",
abstract = "Objectives: This commentary seeks to highlight the benefits of community-based participatory research (CBPR) and promote its use in the violence field. Community perspectives remain underrepresented in the CBPR literature despite the emphasis on equitable partnerships and shared ownership in the research process. Method: Informal interviews were conducted with 10 community partners to understand their perspectives on using and participating in research. Results: Several recommendations for strengthening academic-community research partnerships emerged from the community partners' responses. They were: (a) conduct research that is useful to communities, with a focus on evidence-based practices and cost-benefit analyses; (b) involve community partners early in the development of research questions to ensure that local needs are addressed; (c) engage in frequent and open communication and maintain transparency about research goals and roles and responsibilities of each partner; (d) provide benefits to communities during the research process to promote professional development and build capacity; and (e) disseminate findings quickly, using outlets accessible to communities, and translate into strategies for practice. Conclusion: Although the recommendations require significant investments of time and resources by all partners, use of CBPR can contribute to increased development of innovative and sustainable violence prevention programs, services, and policies that are uniquely informed by scientific evidence and community expertise. By emphasizing partnerships with communities, CBPR helps to reduce the gap between research and practice and facilitates the inclusion of community strengths and resilience as valuable components of violence prevention and intervention.",
keywords = "Academic-community partnerships, Community-based participatory research, Interpersonal violence, Prevention, Resilience",
author = "Yuan, {Nicole P} and Gaines, {Tommi L.} and Jones, {Lisa M.} and Rodriguez, {Lindsey M.} and Nicky Hamilton and Kelly Kinnish",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/vio0000026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "27--33",
journal = "Psychology of Violence",
issn = "2152-0828",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bridging the gap between research and practice by strengthening academic-community partnerships for violence research

AU - Yuan, Nicole P

AU - Gaines, Tommi L.

AU - Jones, Lisa M.

AU - Rodriguez, Lindsey M.

AU - Hamilton, Nicky

AU - Kinnish, Kelly

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Objectives: This commentary seeks to highlight the benefits of community-based participatory research (CBPR) and promote its use in the violence field. Community perspectives remain underrepresented in the CBPR literature despite the emphasis on equitable partnerships and shared ownership in the research process. Method: Informal interviews were conducted with 10 community partners to understand their perspectives on using and participating in research. Results: Several recommendations for strengthening academic-community research partnerships emerged from the community partners' responses. They were: (a) conduct research that is useful to communities, with a focus on evidence-based practices and cost-benefit analyses; (b) involve community partners early in the development of research questions to ensure that local needs are addressed; (c) engage in frequent and open communication and maintain transparency about research goals and roles and responsibilities of each partner; (d) provide benefits to communities during the research process to promote professional development and build capacity; and (e) disseminate findings quickly, using outlets accessible to communities, and translate into strategies for practice. Conclusion: Although the recommendations require significant investments of time and resources by all partners, use of CBPR can contribute to increased development of innovative and sustainable violence prevention programs, services, and policies that are uniquely informed by scientific evidence and community expertise. By emphasizing partnerships with communities, CBPR helps to reduce the gap between research and practice and facilitates the inclusion of community strengths and resilience as valuable components of violence prevention and intervention.

AB - Objectives: This commentary seeks to highlight the benefits of community-based participatory research (CBPR) and promote its use in the violence field. Community perspectives remain underrepresented in the CBPR literature despite the emphasis on equitable partnerships and shared ownership in the research process. Method: Informal interviews were conducted with 10 community partners to understand their perspectives on using and participating in research. Results: Several recommendations for strengthening academic-community research partnerships emerged from the community partners' responses. They were: (a) conduct research that is useful to communities, with a focus on evidence-based practices and cost-benefit analyses; (b) involve community partners early in the development of research questions to ensure that local needs are addressed; (c) engage in frequent and open communication and maintain transparency about research goals and roles and responsibilities of each partner; (d) provide benefits to communities during the research process to promote professional development and build capacity; and (e) disseminate findings quickly, using outlets accessible to communities, and translate into strategies for practice. Conclusion: Although the recommendations require significant investments of time and resources by all partners, use of CBPR can contribute to increased development of innovative and sustainable violence prevention programs, services, and policies that are uniquely informed by scientific evidence and community expertise. By emphasizing partnerships with communities, CBPR helps to reduce the gap between research and practice and facilitates the inclusion of community strengths and resilience as valuable components of violence prevention and intervention.

KW - Academic-community partnerships

KW - Community-based participatory research

KW - Interpersonal violence

KW - Prevention

KW - Resilience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954193055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954193055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/vio0000026

DO - 10.1037/vio0000026

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 27

EP - 33

JO - Psychology of Violence

JF - Psychology of Violence

SN - 2152-0828

IS - 1

ER -