Brief report: Screening items to identify patients with limited health literacy skills

Lorraine S. Wallace, Edwin S. Rogers, Steven E. Roskos, David B. Holiday, Barry D Weiss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

250 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with limited literacy skills are routinely encountered in clinical practice, but they are not always identified by clinicians. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 3 candidate questions to determine their accuracy in identifying patients with limited or marginal health literacy skills. METHODS: We studied 305 English-speaking adults attending a university-based primary care clinic. Demographic items, health literacy screening questions, and the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) were administered to patients. To determine the accuracy of the candidate questions for identifying limited or marginal health literacy skills, we plotted area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves for each item, using REALM scores as a reference standard. RESULTS: The mean age of subjects was 49.5; 67.5% were female, 85.2% Caucasian, and 81.3% insured by TennCare and/or Medicare. Fifty-four (17.7%) had limited and 52 (17.0%) had marginal health literacy skills. One screening question, "How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?" was accurate in detecting limited (AUROC of 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.77 to 0.86) and limited/marginal (AUROC of 0.79; 95% CI =0.74 to 0.83) health literacy skills. This question had significantly greater AUROC than either of the other questions (P<.01) and also a greater AUROC than questions based on demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: One screening question may be sufficient for detecting limited and marginal health literacy skills in clinic populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)874-877
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume21
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2006

Fingerprint

Health Literacy
ROC Curve
Medicine
Demography
Confidence Intervals
Medicare
Primary Health Care
Population
Literacy

Keywords

  • Health literacy
  • Literacy
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Brief report : Screening items to identify patients with limited health literacy skills. / Wallace, Lorraine S.; Rogers, Edwin S.; Roskos, Steven E.; Holiday, David B.; Weiss, Barry D.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 21, No. 8, 08.2006, p. 874-877.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wallace, Lorraine S. ; Rogers, Edwin S. ; Roskos, Steven E. ; Holiday, David B. ; Weiss, Barry D. / Brief report : Screening items to identify patients with limited health literacy skills. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 21, No. 8. pp. 874-877.
@article{1e04c8bc552f418bb1febda8ab8d2f1d,
title = "Brief report: Screening items to identify patients with limited health literacy skills",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Patients with limited literacy skills are routinely encountered in clinical practice, but they are not always identified by clinicians. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 3 candidate questions to determine their accuracy in identifying patients with limited or marginal health literacy skills. METHODS: We studied 305 English-speaking adults attending a university-based primary care clinic. Demographic items, health literacy screening questions, and the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) were administered to patients. To determine the accuracy of the candidate questions for identifying limited or marginal health literacy skills, we plotted area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves for each item, using REALM scores as a reference standard. RESULTS: The mean age of subjects was 49.5; 67.5{\%} were female, 85.2{\%} Caucasian, and 81.3{\%} insured by TennCare and/or Medicare. Fifty-four (17.7{\%}) had limited and 52 (17.0{\%}) had marginal health literacy skills. One screening question, {"}How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?{"} was accurate in detecting limited (AUROC of 0.82; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] =0.77 to 0.86) and limited/marginal (AUROC of 0.79; 95{\%} CI =0.74 to 0.83) health literacy skills. This question had significantly greater AUROC than either of the other questions (P<.01) and also a greater AUROC than questions based on demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: One screening question may be sufficient for detecting limited and marginal health literacy skills in clinic populations.",
keywords = "Health literacy, Literacy, Screening",
author = "Wallace, {Lorraine S.} and Rogers, {Edwin S.} and Roskos, {Steven E.} and Holiday, {David B.} and Weiss, {Barry D}",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00532.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "874--877",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brief report

T2 - Screening items to identify patients with limited health literacy skills

AU - Wallace, Lorraine S.

AU - Rogers, Edwin S.

AU - Roskos, Steven E.

AU - Holiday, David B.

AU - Weiss, Barry D

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - BACKGROUND: Patients with limited literacy skills are routinely encountered in clinical practice, but they are not always identified by clinicians. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 3 candidate questions to determine their accuracy in identifying patients with limited or marginal health literacy skills. METHODS: We studied 305 English-speaking adults attending a university-based primary care clinic. Demographic items, health literacy screening questions, and the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) were administered to patients. To determine the accuracy of the candidate questions for identifying limited or marginal health literacy skills, we plotted area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves for each item, using REALM scores as a reference standard. RESULTS: The mean age of subjects was 49.5; 67.5% were female, 85.2% Caucasian, and 81.3% insured by TennCare and/or Medicare. Fifty-four (17.7%) had limited and 52 (17.0%) had marginal health literacy skills. One screening question, "How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?" was accurate in detecting limited (AUROC of 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.77 to 0.86) and limited/marginal (AUROC of 0.79; 95% CI =0.74 to 0.83) health literacy skills. This question had significantly greater AUROC than either of the other questions (P<.01) and also a greater AUROC than questions based on demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: One screening question may be sufficient for detecting limited and marginal health literacy skills in clinic populations.

AB - BACKGROUND: Patients with limited literacy skills are routinely encountered in clinical practice, but they are not always identified by clinicians. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 3 candidate questions to determine their accuracy in identifying patients with limited or marginal health literacy skills. METHODS: We studied 305 English-speaking adults attending a university-based primary care clinic. Demographic items, health literacy screening questions, and the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) were administered to patients. To determine the accuracy of the candidate questions for identifying limited or marginal health literacy skills, we plotted area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves for each item, using REALM scores as a reference standard. RESULTS: The mean age of subjects was 49.5; 67.5% were female, 85.2% Caucasian, and 81.3% insured by TennCare and/or Medicare. Fifty-four (17.7%) had limited and 52 (17.0%) had marginal health literacy skills. One screening question, "How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?" was accurate in detecting limited (AUROC of 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.77 to 0.86) and limited/marginal (AUROC of 0.79; 95% CI =0.74 to 0.83) health literacy skills. This question had significantly greater AUROC than either of the other questions (P<.01) and also a greater AUROC than questions based on demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: One screening question may be sufficient for detecting limited and marginal health literacy skills in clinic populations.

KW - Health literacy

KW - Literacy

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745788368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745788368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00532.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00532.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16881950

AN - SCOPUS:33745788368

VL - 21

SP - 874

EP - 877

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 8

ER -