Bronchial thermoplasty: Long-term safety and effectiveness in patients with severe persistent asthma

Michael E. Wechsler, Michel Laviolette, Adalberto S. Rubin, Jussara Fiterman, Jose R. Lapa E Silva, Pallav L. Shah, Elie Fiss, Ronald Olivenstein, Neil C. Thomson, Robert M. Niven, Ian D. Pavord, Michael Simoff, Jeff B. Hales, Charlene McEvoy, Dirk Jan Slebos, Mark Holmes, Martin J. Phillips, Serpil C. Erzurum, Nicola A. Hanania, Kaharu SuminoMonica Kraft, Gerard Cox, Daniel H. Sterman, Kyle Hogarth, Joel N. Kline, Adel H. Mansur, Brian E. Louie, William M. Leeds, Richard G. Barbers, John H.M. Austin, Narinder S. Shargill, John Quiring, Brian Armstrong, Mario Castro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

204 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) has previously been shown to improve asthma control out to 2 years in patients with severe persistent asthma. Objective We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of BT in asthmatic patients 5 years after therapy. Methods BT-treated subjects from the Asthma Intervention Research 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01350414) were evaluated annually for 5 years to assess the long-term safety of BT and the durability of its treatment effect. Outcomes assessed after BT included severe exacerbations, adverse events, health care use, spirometric data, and high-resolution computed tomographic scans. Results One hundred sixty-two (85.3%) of 190 BT-treated subjects from the Asthma Intervention Research 2 trial completed 5 years of follow-up. The proportion of subjects experiencing severe exacerbations and emergency department (ED) visits and the rates of events in each of years 1 to 5 remained low and were less than those observed in the 12 months before BT treatment (average 5-year reduction in proportions: 44% for exacerbations and 78% for ED visits). Respiratory adverse events and respiratory-related hospitalizations remained unchanged in years 2 through 5 compared with the first year after BT. Prebronchodilator FEV1 values remained stable between years 1 and 5 after BT, despite a 18% reduction in average daily inhaled corticosteroid dose. High-resolution computed tomographic scans from baseline to 5 years after BT showed no structural abnormalities that could be attributed to BT. Conclusions These data demonstrate the 5-year durability of the benefits of BT with regard to both asthma control (based on maintained reduction in severe exacerbations and ED visits for respiratory symptoms) and safety. BT has become an important addition to our treatment armamentarium and should be considered for patients with severe persistent asthma who remain symptomatic despite taking inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1295-1302.e3
JournalJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume132
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Alair System
  • Bronchial thermoplasty
  • asthma
  • asthma exacerbation
  • bronchoscopic procedure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bronchial thermoplasty: Long-term safety and effectiveness in patients with severe persistent asthma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this