Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site

The gardenroots case study

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A research project that is only expert-driven may ignore the role of local knowledge in research, give low priority to the development of a comprehensive communication strategy to engage the community, and may not deliver the results of the study to the community in an effective way. Objective: To demonstrate how a research program can respond to a community research need, establish a community-academic partnership, and build a co-created citizen science program. Methods: A place-based, community-driven project was designed where academics and community members maintained a reciprocal dialogue, and together, we: 1) defined the question for study, 2) gathered information, 3) developed hypotheses, 3) designed data collection methodologies, 4) collected environmental samples (soil, irrigation water, and vegetables), 5) interpreted data, 6) disseminated results and translated results into action, and 7) discussed results and asked new questions. Results: The co-created environmental research project produced new data and addressed an additional exposure route (consumption of vegetables grown in soils with elevated arsenic levels). Public participation in scientific research improved environmental health assessment, information transfer, and risk communication efforts. Furthermore, incorporating the community in the scientific process produced both individual learning outcomes and community-level outcomes. Conclusions: This approach illustrates the benefits of a community-academic co-created citizen-science program in addressing the complex problems that arise in communities neighboring a contaminated site. Such a project can increase the community's involvement in risk communication and decision-making, which ultimately has the potential to help mitigate exposure and thereby reduce associated risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPublic Health: Improving Health via Inter-Professional Collaborations
PublisherNova Science Publishers, Inc.
Pages183-201
Number of pages19
ISBN (Print)9781633215948, 9781633215696
StatePublished - Jul 1 2014

Fingerprint

Research
Communication
Vegetables
Soil
Environmental Health
Arsenic
Decision Making
Learning
Water
Community Participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Ramirez-Andreotta, M. D., Brusseau, M. L., Artiola, J. F., Maier, R. M., & Gandolfi, A. J. (2014). Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site: The gardenroots case study. In Public Health: Improving Health via Inter-Professional Collaborations (pp. 183-201). Nova Science Publishers, Inc..

Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site : The gardenroots case study. / Ramirez-Andreotta, Monica D.; Brusseau, Mark L; Artiola, Janick F; Maier, Raina Margaret; Gandolfi, A Jay.

Public Health: Improving Health via Inter-Professional Collaborations. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2014. p. 183-201.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Ramirez-Andreotta, MD, Brusseau, ML, Artiola, JF, Maier, RM & Gandolfi, AJ 2014, Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site: The gardenroots case study. in Public Health: Improving Health via Inter-Professional Collaborations. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., pp. 183-201.
Ramirez-Andreotta MD, Brusseau ML, Artiola JF, Maier RM, Gandolfi AJ. Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site: The gardenroots case study. In Public Health: Improving Health via Inter-Professional Collaborations. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 2014. p. 183-201
Ramirez-Andreotta, Monica D. ; Brusseau, Mark L ; Artiola, Janick F ; Maier, Raina Margaret ; Gandolfi, A Jay. / Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site : The gardenroots case study. Public Health: Improving Health via Inter-Professional Collaborations. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2014. pp. 183-201
@inbook{653a8be66cc143eca7eb727c78b14764,
title = "Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site: The gardenroots case study",
abstract = "A research project that is only expert-driven may ignore the role of local knowledge in research, give low priority to the development of a comprehensive communication strategy to engage the community, and may not deliver the results of the study to the community in an effective way. Objective: To demonstrate how a research program can respond to a community research need, establish a community-academic partnership, and build a co-created citizen science program. Methods: A place-based, community-driven project was designed where academics and community members maintained a reciprocal dialogue, and together, we: 1) defined the question for study, 2) gathered information, 3) developed hypotheses, 3) designed data collection methodologies, 4) collected environmental samples (soil, irrigation water, and vegetables), 5) interpreted data, 6) disseminated results and translated results into action, and 7) discussed results and asked new questions. Results: The co-created environmental research project produced new data and addressed an additional exposure route (consumption of vegetables grown in soils with elevated arsenic levels). Public participation in scientific research improved environmental health assessment, information transfer, and risk communication efforts. Furthermore, incorporating the community in the scientific process produced both individual learning outcomes and community-level outcomes. Conclusions: This approach illustrates the benefits of a community-academic co-created citizen-science program in addressing the complex problems that arise in communities neighboring a contaminated site. Such a project can increase the community's involvement in risk communication and decision-making, which ultimately has the potential to help mitigate exposure and thereby reduce associated risk.",
author = "Ramirez-Andreotta, {Monica D.} and Brusseau, {Mark L} and Artiola, {Janick F} and Maier, {Raina Margaret} and Gandolfi, {A Jay}",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781633215948",
pages = "183--201",
booktitle = "Public Health: Improving Health via Inter-Professional Collaborations",
publisher = "Nova Science Publishers, Inc.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site

T2 - The gardenroots case study

AU - Ramirez-Andreotta, Monica D.

AU - Brusseau, Mark L

AU - Artiola, Janick F

AU - Maier, Raina Margaret

AU - Gandolfi, A Jay

PY - 2014/7/1

Y1 - 2014/7/1

N2 - A research project that is only expert-driven may ignore the role of local knowledge in research, give low priority to the development of a comprehensive communication strategy to engage the community, and may not deliver the results of the study to the community in an effective way. Objective: To demonstrate how a research program can respond to a community research need, establish a community-academic partnership, and build a co-created citizen science program. Methods: A place-based, community-driven project was designed where academics and community members maintained a reciprocal dialogue, and together, we: 1) defined the question for study, 2) gathered information, 3) developed hypotheses, 3) designed data collection methodologies, 4) collected environmental samples (soil, irrigation water, and vegetables), 5) interpreted data, 6) disseminated results and translated results into action, and 7) discussed results and asked new questions. Results: The co-created environmental research project produced new data and addressed an additional exposure route (consumption of vegetables grown in soils with elevated arsenic levels). Public participation in scientific research improved environmental health assessment, information transfer, and risk communication efforts. Furthermore, incorporating the community in the scientific process produced both individual learning outcomes and community-level outcomes. Conclusions: This approach illustrates the benefits of a community-academic co-created citizen-science program in addressing the complex problems that arise in communities neighboring a contaminated site. Such a project can increase the community's involvement in risk communication and decision-making, which ultimately has the potential to help mitigate exposure and thereby reduce associated risk.

AB - A research project that is only expert-driven may ignore the role of local knowledge in research, give low priority to the development of a comprehensive communication strategy to engage the community, and may not deliver the results of the study to the community in an effective way. Objective: To demonstrate how a research program can respond to a community research need, establish a community-academic partnership, and build a co-created citizen science program. Methods: A place-based, community-driven project was designed where academics and community members maintained a reciprocal dialogue, and together, we: 1) defined the question for study, 2) gathered information, 3) developed hypotheses, 3) designed data collection methodologies, 4) collected environmental samples (soil, irrigation water, and vegetables), 5) interpreted data, 6) disseminated results and translated results into action, and 7) discussed results and asked new questions. Results: The co-created environmental research project produced new data and addressed an additional exposure route (consumption of vegetables grown in soils with elevated arsenic levels). Public participation in scientific research improved environmental health assessment, information transfer, and risk communication efforts. Furthermore, incorporating the community in the scientific process produced both individual learning outcomes and community-level outcomes. Conclusions: This approach illustrates the benefits of a community-academic co-created citizen-science program in addressing the complex problems that arise in communities neighboring a contaminated site. Such a project can increase the community's involvement in risk communication and decision-making, which ultimately has the potential to help mitigate exposure and thereby reduce associated risk.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952938959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952938959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781633215948

SN - 9781633215696

SP - 183

EP - 201

BT - Public Health: Improving Health via Inter-Professional Collaborations

PB - Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

ER -