Building community, credibility and knowledge

The third US National climate assessment

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Assessments that are designed to be credible and useful in the eyes of potential users must rigorously evaluate the state of knowledge but also address the practical considerations— politics, economics, institutions, and procedures—that affect real-world decision processes. The Third US National Climate Assessment (NCA3) authors integrated a vast array of sources of scientific information to understand what natural, physical and social systems are most at risk from climate change. They were challenged to explore some of the potentially substantial sources of risk that occur at the intersections of social, economic, biological, and physical systems. In addition, they worked to build bridges to other ways of knowing and other sources of knowledge, including intuitive, traditional, cultural, and spiritual knowledge. For the NCA3, inclusion of a broad array of people with on-the-ground experience in various communities, sectors and regions helped in identifying issues of practical importance. The NCA3 was more than a climate assessment; it was also an experiment in testing theories of coproduction of knowledge. A deliberate focus on the assessment process as well as the products yielded important outcomes. For example, encouraging partnerships and engagement with existing networks increased learning and made the idea of a sustained assessment more realistic. The commitment to building an assessment focused on mutual learning, transparency, and engagement contributed to the credibility and legitimacy of the product, and the saliency of its contents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSpringer Climate
PublisherSpringer
Pages9-22
Number of pages14
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Publication series

NameSpringer Climate
ISSN (Print)2352-0698
ISSN (Electronic)2352-0701

Fingerprint

learning
climate
economics
transparency
politics
climate change
experiment
product
decision process
social system

Keywords

  • Assessment process
  • Author team
  • Future assessment
  • Knowledge network
  • Sustained assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Building community, credibility and knowledge : The third US National climate assessment. / Jacobs, Katharine; Buizer, James l.

Springer Climate. Springer, 2016. p. 9-22 (Springer Climate).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

@inbook{5b91aed976314b8c892895b4004188cc,
title = "Building community, credibility and knowledge: The third US National climate assessment",
abstract = "Assessments that are designed to be credible and useful in the eyes of potential users must rigorously evaluate the state of knowledge but also address the practical considerations— politics, economics, institutions, and procedures—that affect real-world decision processes. The Third US National Climate Assessment (NCA3) authors integrated a vast array of sources of scientific information to understand what natural, physical and social systems are most at risk from climate change. They were challenged to explore some of the potentially substantial sources of risk that occur at the intersections of social, economic, biological, and physical systems. In addition, they worked to build bridges to other ways of knowing and other sources of knowledge, including intuitive, traditional, cultural, and spiritual knowledge. For the NCA3, inclusion of a broad array of people with on-the-ground experience in various communities, sectors and regions helped in identifying issues of practical importance. The NCA3 was more than a climate assessment; it was also an experiment in testing theories of coproduction of knowledge. A deliberate focus on the assessment process as well as the products yielded important outcomes. For example, encouraging partnerships and engagement with existing networks increased learning and made the idea of a sustained assessment more realistic. The commitment to building an assessment focused on mutual learning, transparency, and engagement contributed to the credibility and legitimacy of the product, and the saliency of its contents.",
keywords = "Assessment process, Author team, Future assessment, Knowledge network, Sustained assessment",
author = "Katharine Jacobs and Buizer, {James l}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-41802-5_2",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Springer Climate",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "9--22",
booktitle = "Springer Climate",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Building community, credibility and knowledge

T2 - The third US National climate assessment

AU - Jacobs, Katharine

AU - Buizer, James l

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Assessments that are designed to be credible and useful in the eyes of potential users must rigorously evaluate the state of knowledge but also address the practical considerations— politics, economics, institutions, and procedures—that affect real-world decision processes. The Third US National Climate Assessment (NCA3) authors integrated a vast array of sources of scientific information to understand what natural, physical and social systems are most at risk from climate change. They were challenged to explore some of the potentially substantial sources of risk that occur at the intersections of social, economic, biological, and physical systems. In addition, they worked to build bridges to other ways of knowing and other sources of knowledge, including intuitive, traditional, cultural, and spiritual knowledge. For the NCA3, inclusion of a broad array of people with on-the-ground experience in various communities, sectors and regions helped in identifying issues of practical importance. The NCA3 was more than a climate assessment; it was also an experiment in testing theories of coproduction of knowledge. A deliberate focus on the assessment process as well as the products yielded important outcomes. For example, encouraging partnerships and engagement with existing networks increased learning and made the idea of a sustained assessment more realistic. The commitment to building an assessment focused on mutual learning, transparency, and engagement contributed to the credibility and legitimacy of the product, and the saliency of its contents.

AB - Assessments that are designed to be credible and useful in the eyes of potential users must rigorously evaluate the state of knowledge but also address the practical considerations— politics, economics, institutions, and procedures—that affect real-world decision processes. The Third US National Climate Assessment (NCA3) authors integrated a vast array of sources of scientific information to understand what natural, physical and social systems are most at risk from climate change. They were challenged to explore some of the potentially substantial sources of risk that occur at the intersections of social, economic, biological, and physical systems. In addition, they worked to build bridges to other ways of knowing and other sources of knowledge, including intuitive, traditional, cultural, and spiritual knowledge. For the NCA3, inclusion of a broad array of people with on-the-ground experience in various communities, sectors and regions helped in identifying issues of practical importance. The NCA3 was more than a climate assessment; it was also an experiment in testing theories of coproduction of knowledge. A deliberate focus on the assessment process as well as the products yielded important outcomes. For example, encouraging partnerships and engagement with existing networks increased learning and made the idea of a sustained assessment more realistic. The commitment to building an assessment focused on mutual learning, transparency, and engagement contributed to the credibility and legitimacy of the product, and the saliency of its contents.

KW - Assessment process

KW - Author team

KW - Future assessment

KW - Knowledge network

KW - Sustained assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067961309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067961309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-41802-5_2

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-41802-5_2

M3 - Chapter

T3 - Springer Climate

SP - 9

EP - 22

BT - Springer Climate

PB - Springer

ER -