Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Is ventilation necessary?

Robert A. Berg, Karl B Kern, Arthur B Sanders, Charles W Otto, Ronald W. Hilwig, Gordon A. Ewy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

212 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Prompt initiation of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival. Basic life support with mouth-to-mouth ventilation and chest compressions is intimidating, difficult to remember, and difficult to perform. Chest compressions alone can be easily taught, easily remembered, easily performed, adequately taught by dispatcher-delivered telephone instruction, and more readily accepted by the public. The principal objective of this study was to evaluate the need for ventilation during CPR in a clinically relevant swine model of prehospital witnessed cardiac arrest. Methods and Results. Thirty seconds after ventricular fibrillation, swine were randomly assigned to 12 minutes of chest compressions plus mechanical ventilation (group A), chest compressions only (group B), or no CPR (group C). Standard advanced cardiac life support was then provided. Animals successfully resuscitated were supported for 2 hours in an intensive care setting, and then observed for 24 hours. All 16 swine in groups A and B were successfully resuscitated and neurologically normal at 24 hours, whereas only 2 of 8 group C animals survived for 24 hours (P<.001, Fisher's exact test). One of the 2 group C survivors was comatose and unresponsive. Conclusions. In this swine model of witnessed prehospital cardiac arrest, the survival and neurological outcome data establish that prompt initiation of chest compressions alone appears to be as effective as chest compressions plus ventilation and that both techniques of bystander CPR markedly improve outcome compared with no bystander CPR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1907-1915
Number of pages9
JournalCirculation
Volume88
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 1993

Fingerprint

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Ventilation
Thorax
Swine
Heart Arrest
Mouth
Advanced Cardiac Life Support
Ventricular Fibrillation
Critical Care
Coma
Artificial Respiration
Telephone

Keywords

  • Cardiac arrest
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Fibrillation
  • Nervous system
  • Ventilation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation : Is ventilation necessary? / Berg, Robert A.; Kern, Karl B; Sanders, Arthur B; Otto, Charles W; Hilwig, Ronald W.; Ewy, Gordon A.

In: Circulation, Vol. 88, No. 4, 10.1993, p. 1907-1915.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berg, Robert A. ; Kern, Karl B ; Sanders, Arthur B ; Otto, Charles W ; Hilwig, Ronald W. ; Ewy, Gordon A. / Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation : Is ventilation necessary?. In: Circulation. 1993 ; Vol. 88, No. 4. pp. 1907-1915.
@article{1ffef79299dc4633bba94a3a614c007d,
title = "Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Is ventilation necessary?",
abstract = "Background. Prompt initiation of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival. Basic life support with mouth-to-mouth ventilation and chest compressions is intimidating, difficult to remember, and difficult to perform. Chest compressions alone can be easily taught, easily remembered, easily performed, adequately taught by dispatcher-delivered telephone instruction, and more readily accepted by the public. The principal objective of this study was to evaluate the need for ventilation during CPR in a clinically relevant swine model of prehospital witnessed cardiac arrest. Methods and Results. Thirty seconds after ventricular fibrillation, swine were randomly assigned to 12 minutes of chest compressions plus mechanical ventilation (group A), chest compressions only (group B), or no CPR (group C). Standard advanced cardiac life support was then provided. Animals successfully resuscitated were supported for 2 hours in an intensive care setting, and then observed for 24 hours. All 16 swine in groups A and B were successfully resuscitated and neurologically normal at 24 hours, whereas only 2 of 8 group C animals survived for 24 hours (P<.001, Fisher's exact test). One of the 2 group C survivors was comatose and unresponsive. Conclusions. In this swine model of witnessed prehospital cardiac arrest, the survival and neurological outcome data establish that prompt initiation of chest compressions alone appears to be as effective as chest compressions plus ventilation and that both techniques of bystander CPR markedly improve outcome compared with no bystander CPR.",
keywords = "Cardiac arrest, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Fibrillation, Nervous system, Ventilation",
author = "Berg, {Robert A.} and Kern, {Karl B} and Sanders, {Arthur B} and Otto, {Charles W} and Hilwig, {Ronald W.} and Ewy, {Gordon A.}",
year = "1993",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "1907--1915",
journal = "Circulation",
issn = "0009-7322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation

T2 - Is ventilation necessary?

AU - Berg, Robert A.

AU - Kern, Karl B

AU - Sanders, Arthur B

AU - Otto, Charles W

AU - Hilwig, Ronald W.

AU - Ewy, Gordon A.

PY - 1993/10

Y1 - 1993/10

N2 - Background. Prompt initiation of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival. Basic life support with mouth-to-mouth ventilation and chest compressions is intimidating, difficult to remember, and difficult to perform. Chest compressions alone can be easily taught, easily remembered, easily performed, adequately taught by dispatcher-delivered telephone instruction, and more readily accepted by the public. The principal objective of this study was to evaluate the need for ventilation during CPR in a clinically relevant swine model of prehospital witnessed cardiac arrest. Methods and Results. Thirty seconds after ventricular fibrillation, swine were randomly assigned to 12 minutes of chest compressions plus mechanical ventilation (group A), chest compressions only (group B), or no CPR (group C). Standard advanced cardiac life support was then provided. Animals successfully resuscitated were supported for 2 hours in an intensive care setting, and then observed for 24 hours. All 16 swine in groups A and B were successfully resuscitated and neurologically normal at 24 hours, whereas only 2 of 8 group C animals survived for 24 hours (P<.001, Fisher's exact test). One of the 2 group C survivors was comatose and unresponsive. Conclusions. In this swine model of witnessed prehospital cardiac arrest, the survival and neurological outcome data establish that prompt initiation of chest compressions alone appears to be as effective as chest compressions plus ventilation and that both techniques of bystander CPR markedly improve outcome compared with no bystander CPR.

AB - Background. Prompt initiation of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival. Basic life support with mouth-to-mouth ventilation and chest compressions is intimidating, difficult to remember, and difficult to perform. Chest compressions alone can be easily taught, easily remembered, easily performed, adequately taught by dispatcher-delivered telephone instruction, and more readily accepted by the public. The principal objective of this study was to evaluate the need for ventilation during CPR in a clinically relevant swine model of prehospital witnessed cardiac arrest. Methods and Results. Thirty seconds after ventricular fibrillation, swine were randomly assigned to 12 minutes of chest compressions plus mechanical ventilation (group A), chest compressions only (group B), or no CPR (group C). Standard advanced cardiac life support was then provided. Animals successfully resuscitated were supported for 2 hours in an intensive care setting, and then observed for 24 hours. All 16 swine in groups A and B were successfully resuscitated and neurologically normal at 24 hours, whereas only 2 of 8 group C animals survived for 24 hours (P<.001, Fisher's exact test). One of the 2 group C survivors was comatose and unresponsive. Conclusions. In this swine model of witnessed prehospital cardiac arrest, the survival and neurological outcome data establish that prompt initiation of chest compressions alone appears to be as effective as chest compressions plus ventilation and that both techniques of bystander CPR markedly improve outcome compared with no bystander CPR.

KW - Cardiac arrest

KW - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

KW - Fibrillation

KW - Nervous system

KW - Ventilation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027378131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027378131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8403336

AN - SCOPUS:0027378131

VL - 88

SP - 1907

EP - 1915

JO - Circulation

JF - Circulation

SN - 0009-7322

IS - 4

ER -