'Bystander' chest compressions and assisted ventilation independently improve outcome from piglet asphyxial pulseless 'cardiac arrest'

Robert A. Berg, Ronald W. Hilwig, Karl B Kern, Gordon A. Ewy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

164 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background - Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) without assisted ventilation may be as effective as CPR with assisted ventilation for ventricular fibrillatory cardiac arrests. However, chest compressions alone or ventilation alone is not effective for complete asphyxial cardiac arrests (loss of aortic pulsations). The objective of this investigation was to determine whether these techniques can independently improve outcome at an earlier stage of the asphyxial process. Methods and Results - After induction of anesthesia, 40 piglets (11.5±0.3 kg) underwent endotracheal tube clamping (6.8±0.3 minutes) until simulated pulselessness, defined as aortic systolic pressure <50 mm Hg. For the 8-minute 'bystander CPR' period, animals were randomly assigned to chest compressions and assisted ventilation (CC+V), chest compressions only (CC), assisted ventilation only (V), or no bystander CPR (control group). Return of spontaneous circulation occurred during the first 2 minutes of bystander CPR in 10 of 10 CC+V piglets, 6 of 10 V piglets, 4 of 10 CC piglets, and none of the controls (CC+V or V versus controls, P<0.01; CC+V versus CC and V combined, P=0.01). During the first minute of CPR, arterial and mixed venous blood gases were superior in the 3 experimental groups compared with the controls. Twenty-four-hour survival was similarly superior in the 3 experimental groups compared with the controls (8 of 10, 6 of 10, 5 of 10, and 0 of 10, P<0.05 each). Conclusions - Bystander CPR with CC+V improves outcome in the early stages of apparent pulseless asphyxial cardiac arrest. In addition, this study establishes that bystander CPR with CC or V can independently improve outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1743-1748
Number of pages6
JournalCirculation
Volume101
Issue number14
StatePublished - Apr 11 2000

Fingerprint

Heart Arrest
Ventilation
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Thorax
Constriction
Arterial Pressure
Anesthesia
Gases
Blood Pressure
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Asphyxia
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Heart arrest
  • Pediatrics
  • Ventilation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

'Bystander' chest compressions and assisted ventilation independently improve outcome from piglet asphyxial pulseless 'cardiac arrest'. / Berg, Robert A.; Hilwig, Ronald W.; Kern, Karl B; Ewy, Gordon A.

In: Circulation, Vol. 101, No. 14, 11.04.2000, p. 1743-1748.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{45e0db7b4d974f988a0bcc66df0b6544,
title = "'Bystander' chest compressions and assisted ventilation independently improve outcome from piglet asphyxial pulseless 'cardiac arrest'",
abstract = "Background - Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) without assisted ventilation may be as effective as CPR with assisted ventilation for ventricular fibrillatory cardiac arrests. However, chest compressions alone or ventilation alone is not effective for complete asphyxial cardiac arrests (loss of aortic pulsations). The objective of this investigation was to determine whether these techniques can independently improve outcome at an earlier stage of the asphyxial process. Methods and Results - After induction of anesthesia, 40 piglets (11.5±0.3 kg) underwent endotracheal tube clamping (6.8±0.3 minutes) until simulated pulselessness, defined as aortic systolic pressure <50 mm Hg. For the 8-minute 'bystander CPR' period, animals were randomly assigned to chest compressions and assisted ventilation (CC+V), chest compressions only (CC), assisted ventilation only (V), or no bystander CPR (control group). Return of spontaneous circulation occurred during the first 2 minutes of bystander CPR in 10 of 10 CC+V piglets, 6 of 10 V piglets, 4 of 10 CC piglets, and none of the controls (CC+V or V versus controls, P<0.01; CC+V versus CC and V combined, P=0.01). During the first minute of CPR, arterial and mixed venous blood gases were superior in the 3 experimental groups compared with the controls. Twenty-four-hour survival was similarly superior in the 3 experimental groups compared with the controls (8 of 10, 6 of 10, 5 of 10, and 0 of 10, P<0.05 each). Conclusions - Bystander CPR with CC+V improves outcome in the early stages of apparent pulseless asphyxial cardiac arrest. In addition, this study establishes that bystander CPR with CC or V can independently improve outcome.",
keywords = "Asphyxia, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Heart arrest, Pediatrics, Ventilation",
author = "Berg, {Robert A.} and Hilwig, {Ronald W.} and Kern, {Karl B} and Ewy, {Gordon A.}",
year = "2000",
month = "4",
day = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "1743--1748",
journal = "Circulation",
issn = "0009-7322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Bystander' chest compressions and assisted ventilation independently improve outcome from piglet asphyxial pulseless 'cardiac arrest'

AU - Berg, Robert A.

AU - Hilwig, Ronald W.

AU - Kern, Karl B

AU - Ewy, Gordon A.

PY - 2000/4/11

Y1 - 2000/4/11

N2 - Background - Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) without assisted ventilation may be as effective as CPR with assisted ventilation for ventricular fibrillatory cardiac arrests. However, chest compressions alone or ventilation alone is not effective for complete asphyxial cardiac arrests (loss of aortic pulsations). The objective of this investigation was to determine whether these techniques can independently improve outcome at an earlier stage of the asphyxial process. Methods and Results - After induction of anesthesia, 40 piglets (11.5±0.3 kg) underwent endotracheal tube clamping (6.8±0.3 minutes) until simulated pulselessness, defined as aortic systolic pressure <50 mm Hg. For the 8-minute 'bystander CPR' period, animals were randomly assigned to chest compressions and assisted ventilation (CC+V), chest compressions only (CC), assisted ventilation only (V), or no bystander CPR (control group). Return of spontaneous circulation occurred during the first 2 minutes of bystander CPR in 10 of 10 CC+V piglets, 6 of 10 V piglets, 4 of 10 CC piglets, and none of the controls (CC+V or V versus controls, P<0.01; CC+V versus CC and V combined, P=0.01). During the first minute of CPR, arterial and mixed venous blood gases were superior in the 3 experimental groups compared with the controls. Twenty-four-hour survival was similarly superior in the 3 experimental groups compared with the controls (8 of 10, 6 of 10, 5 of 10, and 0 of 10, P<0.05 each). Conclusions - Bystander CPR with CC+V improves outcome in the early stages of apparent pulseless asphyxial cardiac arrest. In addition, this study establishes that bystander CPR with CC or V can independently improve outcome.

AB - Background - Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) without assisted ventilation may be as effective as CPR with assisted ventilation for ventricular fibrillatory cardiac arrests. However, chest compressions alone or ventilation alone is not effective for complete asphyxial cardiac arrests (loss of aortic pulsations). The objective of this investigation was to determine whether these techniques can independently improve outcome at an earlier stage of the asphyxial process. Methods and Results - After induction of anesthesia, 40 piglets (11.5±0.3 kg) underwent endotracheal tube clamping (6.8±0.3 minutes) until simulated pulselessness, defined as aortic systolic pressure <50 mm Hg. For the 8-minute 'bystander CPR' period, animals were randomly assigned to chest compressions and assisted ventilation (CC+V), chest compressions only (CC), assisted ventilation only (V), or no bystander CPR (control group). Return of spontaneous circulation occurred during the first 2 minutes of bystander CPR in 10 of 10 CC+V piglets, 6 of 10 V piglets, 4 of 10 CC piglets, and none of the controls (CC+V or V versus controls, P<0.01; CC+V versus CC and V combined, P=0.01). During the first minute of CPR, arterial and mixed venous blood gases were superior in the 3 experimental groups compared with the controls. Twenty-four-hour survival was similarly superior in the 3 experimental groups compared with the controls (8 of 10, 6 of 10, 5 of 10, and 0 of 10, P<0.05 each). Conclusions - Bystander CPR with CC+V improves outcome in the early stages of apparent pulseless asphyxial cardiac arrest. In addition, this study establishes that bystander CPR with CC or V can independently improve outcome.

KW - Asphyxia

KW - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

KW - Heart arrest

KW - Pediatrics

KW - Ventilation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034636064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034636064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10758059

AN - SCOPUS:0034636064

VL - 101

SP - 1743

EP - 1748

JO - Circulation

JF - Circulation

SN - 0009-7322

IS - 14

ER -