Calibration of a semi-distributed hydrologic model for streamflow estimation along a river system

Newsha K. Ajami, Hoshin Vijai Gupta, Thorsten Wagener, Soroosh Sorooshian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

170 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An important goal of spatially distributed hydrologic modeling is to provide estimates of streamflow (and river levels) at any point along the river system. To encourage collaborative research into appropriate levels of model complexity, the value of spatially distributed data, and methods suitable for model development and calibration, the US National Weather Service Hydrology Laboratory (NWSHL) is promoting the distributed modeling intercomparison project (DMIP). In particular, the project is interested in how spatially distributed estimates of precipitation provided by the next generation radar (NEXRAD) network, high resolution digital elevation models (DEM), soil, land-use and vegetation data can be integrated into an improved system for distributed hydrologic modeling that provides more accurate and informative flood forecasts. The goal of this study is to explore four questions: Can a semi-distributed approach improve the streamflow forecasts at the watershed outlet compared to a lumped approach? What is a suitable calibration strategy for a semi-distributed model structure, and how much improvement can be obtained? What is the minimum level of spatial complexity required, above which the improvement in forecast accuracy is marginal? What spatial details must be included to enable flow prediction at any point along the river network? The study compares lumped, semi-lumped and semi-distributed versions of the SAC-SMA (Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting) model for the Illinois River basin at Watts (OK). A kinematic wave scheme is used to rout the flow along the river channel to the outlet. A Multi-step Automatic Calibration Scheme (MACS) using the Shuffled Complex Evolution (SCE-UA) optimization algorithm is applied for model calibration. The calibration results reveal that moving from a lumped model structure, driven by spatially averaged NEXRAD data over the entire basin, to a semi-distributed model structure, with forcing data averaged over each sub-basin while having identical parameters for all the sub-basins, improves the simulation results. However, varying the parameters between sub-basins does not further improve the simulation results, either at the outlet or at an interior testing point.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)112-135
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Hydrology
Volume298
Issue number1-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2004

Fingerprint

stream flow
hydrologic models
river system
streamflow
calibration
rivers
basin
basins
radar
modeling
Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model
river channel
Illinois River
river
digital elevation model
simulation
cooperative research
hydrology
digital elevation models
river basin

Keywords

  • Calibration
  • Distributed hydrologic modeling
  • Flow forecasting
  • NEXRAD

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Soil Science
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

Calibration of a semi-distributed hydrologic model for streamflow estimation along a river system. / K. Ajami, Newsha; Gupta, Hoshin Vijai; Wagener, Thorsten; Sorooshian, Soroosh.

In: Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 298, No. 1-4, 01.10.2004, p. 112-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

K. Ajami, Newsha ; Gupta, Hoshin Vijai ; Wagener, Thorsten ; Sorooshian, Soroosh. / Calibration of a semi-distributed hydrologic model for streamflow estimation along a river system. In: Journal of Hydrology. 2004 ; Vol. 298, No. 1-4. pp. 112-135.
@article{f7ff32eee50d4b188cab7a808a27f306,
title = "Calibration of a semi-distributed hydrologic model for streamflow estimation along a river system",
abstract = "An important goal of spatially distributed hydrologic modeling is to provide estimates of streamflow (and river levels) at any point along the river system. To encourage collaborative research into appropriate levels of model complexity, the value of spatially distributed data, and methods suitable for model development and calibration, the US National Weather Service Hydrology Laboratory (NWSHL) is promoting the distributed modeling intercomparison project (DMIP). In particular, the project is interested in how spatially distributed estimates of precipitation provided by the next generation radar (NEXRAD) network, high resolution digital elevation models (DEM), soil, land-use and vegetation data can be integrated into an improved system for distributed hydrologic modeling that provides more accurate and informative flood forecasts. The goal of this study is to explore four questions: Can a semi-distributed approach improve the streamflow forecasts at the watershed outlet compared to a lumped approach? What is a suitable calibration strategy for a semi-distributed model structure, and how much improvement can be obtained? What is the minimum level of spatial complexity required, above which the improvement in forecast accuracy is marginal? What spatial details must be included to enable flow prediction at any point along the river network? The study compares lumped, semi-lumped and semi-distributed versions of the SAC-SMA (Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting) model for the Illinois River basin at Watts (OK). A kinematic wave scheme is used to rout the flow along the river channel to the outlet. A Multi-step Automatic Calibration Scheme (MACS) using the Shuffled Complex Evolution (SCE-UA) optimization algorithm is applied for model calibration. The calibration results reveal that moving from a lumped model structure, driven by spatially averaged NEXRAD data over the entire basin, to a semi-distributed model structure, with forcing data averaged over each sub-basin while having identical parameters for all the sub-basins, improves the simulation results. However, varying the parameters between sub-basins does not further improve the simulation results, either at the outlet or at an interior testing point.",
keywords = "Calibration, Distributed hydrologic modeling, Flow forecasting, NEXRAD",
author = "{K. Ajami}, Newsha and Gupta, {Hoshin Vijai} and Thorsten Wagener and Soroosh Sorooshian",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.033",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "298",
pages = "112--135",
journal = "Journal of Hydrology",
issn = "0022-1694",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Calibration of a semi-distributed hydrologic model for streamflow estimation along a river system

AU - K. Ajami, Newsha

AU - Gupta, Hoshin Vijai

AU - Wagener, Thorsten

AU - Sorooshian, Soroosh

PY - 2004/10/1

Y1 - 2004/10/1

N2 - An important goal of spatially distributed hydrologic modeling is to provide estimates of streamflow (and river levels) at any point along the river system. To encourage collaborative research into appropriate levels of model complexity, the value of spatially distributed data, and methods suitable for model development and calibration, the US National Weather Service Hydrology Laboratory (NWSHL) is promoting the distributed modeling intercomparison project (DMIP). In particular, the project is interested in how spatially distributed estimates of precipitation provided by the next generation radar (NEXRAD) network, high resolution digital elevation models (DEM), soil, land-use and vegetation data can be integrated into an improved system for distributed hydrologic modeling that provides more accurate and informative flood forecasts. The goal of this study is to explore four questions: Can a semi-distributed approach improve the streamflow forecasts at the watershed outlet compared to a lumped approach? What is a suitable calibration strategy for a semi-distributed model structure, and how much improvement can be obtained? What is the minimum level of spatial complexity required, above which the improvement in forecast accuracy is marginal? What spatial details must be included to enable flow prediction at any point along the river network? The study compares lumped, semi-lumped and semi-distributed versions of the SAC-SMA (Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting) model for the Illinois River basin at Watts (OK). A kinematic wave scheme is used to rout the flow along the river channel to the outlet. A Multi-step Automatic Calibration Scheme (MACS) using the Shuffled Complex Evolution (SCE-UA) optimization algorithm is applied for model calibration. The calibration results reveal that moving from a lumped model structure, driven by spatially averaged NEXRAD data over the entire basin, to a semi-distributed model structure, with forcing data averaged over each sub-basin while having identical parameters for all the sub-basins, improves the simulation results. However, varying the parameters between sub-basins does not further improve the simulation results, either at the outlet or at an interior testing point.

AB - An important goal of spatially distributed hydrologic modeling is to provide estimates of streamflow (and river levels) at any point along the river system. To encourage collaborative research into appropriate levels of model complexity, the value of spatially distributed data, and methods suitable for model development and calibration, the US National Weather Service Hydrology Laboratory (NWSHL) is promoting the distributed modeling intercomparison project (DMIP). In particular, the project is interested in how spatially distributed estimates of precipitation provided by the next generation radar (NEXRAD) network, high resolution digital elevation models (DEM), soil, land-use and vegetation data can be integrated into an improved system for distributed hydrologic modeling that provides more accurate and informative flood forecasts. The goal of this study is to explore four questions: Can a semi-distributed approach improve the streamflow forecasts at the watershed outlet compared to a lumped approach? What is a suitable calibration strategy for a semi-distributed model structure, and how much improvement can be obtained? What is the minimum level of spatial complexity required, above which the improvement in forecast accuracy is marginal? What spatial details must be included to enable flow prediction at any point along the river network? The study compares lumped, semi-lumped and semi-distributed versions of the SAC-SMA (Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting) model for the Illinois River basin at Watts (OK). A kinematic wave scheme is used to rout the flow along the river channel to the outlet. A Multi-step Automatic Calibration Scheme (MACS) using the Shuffled Complex Evolution (SCE-UA) optimization algorithm is applied for model calibration. The calibration results reveal that moving from a lumped model structure, driven by spatially averaged NEXRAD data over the entire basin, to a semi-distributed model structure, with forcing data averaged over each sub-basin while having identical parameters for all the sub-basins, improves the simulation results. However, varying the parameters between sub-basins does not further improve the simulation results, either at the outlet or at an interior testing point.

KW - Calibration

KW - Distributed hydrologic modeling

KW - Flow forecasting

KW - NEXRAD

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4143128903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4143128903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.033

DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.033

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:4143128903

VL - 298

SP - 112

EP - 135

JO - Journal of Hydrology

JF - Journal of Hydrology

SN - 0022-1694

IS - 1-4

ER -