Canal electrode electrocochleography in patients with absent wave I ABRs

Frank Musiek, J. A. Baran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fifteen patients (23 ears) who demonstrated no recordable wave I at the time of clinical auditory brainstem response testing were subsequently retested under three auditory brainstem response-electrocochleography conditions. One condition was the traditional auditory brainstem response, another was the auditory brainstem response with electrocochleography filtering, and the third was an electrocochleographic condition using a canal electrode (Tiptrode). The electrocochleographic recording condition provided more readable wave I responses than the other conditions. In addtion, the electrocochleographic condition provided wave I amplitudes that were greater than those of the traditional auditory brainstem response. The later waves of the auditory brainstem response (III and V) were similar in wave presence amplitudes and latencies for all three test conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-31
Number of pages7
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume103
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Evoked Response Audiometry
Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials
Electrodes
Ear

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Canal electrode electrocochleography in patients with absent wave I ABRs. / Musiek, Frank; Baran, J. A.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 103, No. 1, 1990, p. 25-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a5d62e3d66e84f439841a2a4c6b623ee,
title = "Canal electrode electrocochleography in patients with absent wave I ABRs",
abstract = "Fifteen patients (23 ears) who demonstrated no recordable wave I at the time of clinical auditory brainstem response testing were subsequently retested under three auditory brainstem response-electrocochleography conditions. One condition was the traditional auditory brainstem response, another was the auditory brainstem response with electrocochleography filtering, and the third was an electrocochleographic condition using a canal electrode (Tiptrode). The electrocochleographic recording condition provided more readable wave I responses than the other conditions. In addtion, the electrocochleographic condition provided wave I amplitudes that were greater than those of the traditional auditory brainstem response. The later waves of the auditory brainstem response (III and V) were similar in wave presence amplitudes and latencies for all three test conditions.",
author = "Frank Musiek and Baran, {J. A.}",
year = "1990",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "103",
pages = "25--31",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Canal electrode electrocochleography in patients with absent wave I ABRs

AU - Musiek, Frank

AU - Baran, J. A.

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - Fifteen patients (23 ears) who demonstrated no recordable wave I at the time of clinical auditory brainstem response testing were subsequently retested under three auditory brainstem response-electrocochleography conditions. One condition was the traditional auditory brainstem response, another was the auditory brainstem response with electrocochleography filtering, and the third was an electrocochleographic condition using a canal electrode (Tiptrode). The electrocochleographic recording condition provided more readable wave I responses than the other conditions. In addtion, the electrocochleographic condition provided wave I amplitudes that were greater than those of the traditional auditory brainstem response. The later waves of the auditory brainstem response (III and V) were similar in wave presence amplitudes and latencies for all three test conditions.

AB - Fifteen patients (23 ears) who demonstrated no recordable wave I at the time of clinical auditory brainstem response testing were subsequently retested under three auditory brainstem response-electrocochleography conditions. One condition was the traditional auditory brainstem response, another was the auditory brainstem response with electrocochleography filtering, and the third was an electrocochleographic condition using a canal electrode (Tiptrode). The electrocochleographic recording condition provided more readable wave I responses than the other conditions. In addtion, the electrocochleographic condition provided wave I amplitudes that were greater than those of the traditional auditory brainstem response. The later waves of the auditory brainstem response (III and V) were similar in wave presence amplitudes and latencies for all three test conditions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025348993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025348993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 25

EP - 31

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 1

ER -