Canopy temperature for simulation of heat stress in irrigated wheat in a semi-arid environment

A multi-model comparison

Heidi Webber, Pierre Martre, Senthold Asseng, Bruce Kimball, Jeffrey White, Michael J Ottman, Gerard W. Wall, Giacomo De Sanctis, Jordi Doltra, Robert Grant, Belay Kassie, Andrea Maiorano, Jørgen E. Olesen, Dominique Ripoche, Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei, Mikhail A. Semenov, Pierre Stratonovitch, Frank Ewert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Even brief periods of high temperatures occurring around flowering and during grain filling can severely reduce grain yield in cereals. Recently, ecophysiological and crop models have begun to represent such phenomena. Most models use air temperature (Tair) in their heat stress responses despite evidence that crop canopy temperature (Tc) better explains grain yield losses. Tc can deviate significantly from Tair based on climatic factors and the crop water status. The broad objective of this study was to evaluate whether simulation of Tc improves the ability of crop models to simulate heat stress impacts on wheat under irrigated conditions. Nine process-based models, each using one of three broad approaches (empirical, EMP; energy balance assuming neutral atmospheric stability, EBN; and energy balance correcting for the atmospheric stability conditions, EBSC) to simulate Tc, simulated grain yield under a range of temperature conditions. The models varied widely in their ability to reproduce the measured Tc with the commonly used EBN models performing much worse than either EMP or EBSC. Use of Tc to account for heat stress effects did improve simulations compared to using only Tair to a relatively minor extent, but the models that additionally use Tc on various other processes as well did not have better yield simulations. Models that simulated yield well under heat stress had varying skill in simulating Tc. For example, the EBN models had very poor simulations of Tc but performed very well in simulating grain yield. These results highlight the need to more systematically understand and model heat stress events in wheat.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-35
Number of pages15
JournalField Crops Research
Volume202
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2017

Fingerprint

dry environmental conditions
arid environment
heat stress
wheat
canopy
simulation
temperature
grain yield
crop models
crop
energy balance
irrigated conditions
comparison
climatic factors
filling period
air temperature
cereal
flowering
crops

Keywords

  • Canopy temperature
  • Crop model comparison
  • Heat stress
  • Wheat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Soil Science

Cite this

Canopy temperature for simulation of heat stress in irrigated wheat in a semi-arid environment : A multi-model comparison. / Webber, Heidi; Martre, Pierre; Asseng, Senthold; Kimball, Bruce; White, Jeffrey; Ottman, Michael J; Wall, Gerard W.; De Sanctis, Giacomo; Doltra, Jordi; Grant, Robert; Kassie, Belay; Maiorano, Andrea; Olesen, Jørgen E.; Ripoche, Dominique; Rezaei, Ehsan Eyshi; Semenov, Mikhail A.; Stratonovitch, Pierre; Ewert, Frank.

In: Field Crops Research, Vol. 202, 15.02.2017, p. 21-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Webber, H, Martre, P, Asseng, S, Kimball, B, White, J, Ottman, MJ, Wall, GW, De Sanctis, G, Doltra, J, Grant, R, Kassie, B, Maiorano, A, Olesen, JE, Ripoche, D, Rezaei, EE, Semenov, MA, Stratonovitch, P & Ewert, F 2017, 'Canopy temperature for simulation of heat stress in irrigated wheat in a semi-arid environment: A multi-model comparison', Field Crops Research, vol. 202, pp. 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.009
Webber, Heidi ; Martre, Pierre ; Asseng, Senthold ; Kimball, Bruce ; White, Jeffrey ; Ottman, Michael J ; Wall, Gerard W. ; De Sanctis, Giacomo ; Doltra, Jordi ; Grant, Robert ; Kassie, Belay ; Maiorano, Andrea ; Olesen, Jørgen E. ; Ripoche, Dominique ; Rezaei, Ehsan Eyshi ; Semenov, Mikhail A. ; Stratonovitch, Pierre ; Ewert, Frank. / Canopy temperature for simulation of heat stress in irrigated wheat in a semi-arid environment : A multi-model comparison. In: Field Crops Research. 2017 ; Vol. 202. pp. 21-35.
@article{bd5e9b8b4fd248568575cfce7cf4aad8,
title = "Canopy temperature for simulation of heat stress in irrigated wheat in a semi-arid environment: A multi-model comparison",
abstract = "Even brief periods of high temperatures occurring around flowering and during grain filling can severely reduce grain yield in cereals. Recently, ecophysiological and crop models have begun to represent such phenomena. Most models use air temperature (Tair) in their heat stress responses despite evidence that crop canopy temperature (Tc) better explains grain yield losses. Tc can deviate significantly from Tair based on climatic factors and the crop water status. The broad objective of this study was to evaluate whether simulation of Tc improves the ability of crop models to simulate heat stress impacts on wheat under irrigated conditions. Nine process-based models, each using one of three broad approaches (empirical, EMP; energy balance assuming neutral atmospheric stability, EBN; and energy balance correcting for the atmospheric stability conditions, EBSC) to simulate Tc, simulated grain yield under a range of temperature conditions. The models varied widely in their ability to reproduce the measured Tc with the commonly used EBN models performing much worse than either EMP or EBSC. Use of Tc to account for heat stress effects did improve simulations compared to using only Tair to a relatively minor extent, but the models that additionally use Tc on various other processes as well did not have better yield simulations. Models that simulated yield well under heat stress had varying skill in simulating Tc. For example, the EBN models had very poor simulations of Tc but performed very well in simulating grain yield. These results highlight the need to more systematically understand and model heat stress events in wheat.",
keywords = "Canopy temperature, Crop model comparison, Heat stress, Wheat",
author = "Heidi Webber and Pierre Martre and Senthold Asseng and Bruce Kimball and Jeffrey White and Ottman, {Michael J} and Wall, {Gerard W.} and {De Sanctis}, Giacomo and Jordi Doltra and Robert Grant and Belay Kassie and Andrea Maiorano and Olesen, {J{\o}rgen E.} and Dominique Ripoche and Rezaei, {Ehsan Eyshi} and Semenov, {Mikhail A.} and Pierre Stratonovitch and Frank Ewert",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "202",
pages = "21--35",
journal = "Field Crops Research",
issn = "0378-4290",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Canopy temperature for simulation of heat stress in irrigated wheat in a semi-arid environment

T2 - A multi-model comparison

AU - Webber, Heidi

AU - Martre, Pierre

AU - Asseng, Senthold

AU - Kimball, Bruce

AU - White, Jeffrey

AU - Ottman, Michael J

AU - Wall, Gerard W.

AU - De Sanctis, Giacomo

AU - Doltra, Jordi

AU - Grant, Robert

AU - Kassie, Belay

AU - Maiorano, Andrea

AU - Olesen, Jørgen E.

AU - Ripoche, Dominique

AU - Rezaei, Ehsan Eyshi

AU - Semenov, Mikhail A.

AU - Stratonovitch, Pierre

AU - Ewert, Frank

PY - 2017/2/15

Y1 - 2017/2/15

N2 - Even brief periods of high temperatures occurring around flowering and during grain filling can severely reduce grain yield in cereals. Recently, ecophysiological and crop models have begun to represent such phenomena. Most models use air temperature (Tair) in their heat stress responses despite evidence that crop canopy temperature (Tc) better explains grain yield losses. Tc can deviate significantly from Tair based on climatic factors and the crop water status. The broad objective of this study was to evaluate whether simulation of Tc improves the ability of crop models to simulate heat stress impacts on wheat under irrigated conditions. Nine process-based models, each using one of three broad approaches (empirical, EMP; energy balance assuming neutral atmospheric stability, EBN; and energy balance correcting for the atmospheric stability conditions, EBSC) to simulate Tc, simulated grain yield under a range of temperature conditions. The models varied widely in their ability to reproduce the measured Tc with the commonly used EBN models performing much worse than either EMP or EBSC. Use of Tc to account for heat stress effects did improve simulations compared to using only Tair to a relatively minor extent, but the models that additionally use Tc on various other processes as well did not have better yield simulations. Models that simulated yield well under heat stress had varying skill in simulating Tc. For example, the EBN models had very poor simulations of Tc but performed very well in simulating grain yield. These results highlight the need to more systematically understand and model heat stress events in wheat.

AB - Even brief periods of high temperatures occurring around flowering and during grain filling can severely reduce grain yield in cereals. Recently, ecophysiological and crop models have begun to represent such phenomena. Most models use air temperature (Tair) in their heat stress responses despite evidence that crop canopy temperature (Tc) better explains grain yield losses. Tc can deviate significantly from Tair based on climatic factors and the crop water status. The broad objective of this study was to evaluate whether simulation of Tc improves the ability of crop models to simulate heat stress impacts on wheat under irrigated conditions. Nine process-based models, each using one of three broad approaches (empirical, EMP; energy balance assuming neutral atmospheric stability, EBN; and energy balance correcting for the atmospheric stability conditions, EBSC) to simulate Tc, simulated grain yield under a range of temperature conditions. The models varied widely in their ability to reproduce the measured Tc with the commonly used EBN models performing much worse than either EMP or EBSC. Use of Tc to account for heat stress effects did improve simulations compared to using only Tair to a relatively minor extent, but the models that additionally use Tc on various other processes as well did not have better yield simulations. Models that simulated yield well under heat stress had varying skill in simulating Tc. For example, the EBN models had very poor simulations of Tc but performed very well in simulating grain yield. These results highlight the need to more systematically understand and model heat stress events in wheat.

KW - Canopy temperature

KW - Crop model comparison

KW - Heat stress

KW - Wheat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009709400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009709400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.009

DO - 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.009

M3 - Article

VL - 202

SP - 21

EP - 35

JO - Field Crops Research

JF - Field Crops Research

SN - 0378-4290

ER -