Cap-and-trade policy challenges

A tale of three markets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cap-and-trade policy instruments have been applied to a number of environmental problems, with varying success. This article examines cap-and-trade programs for SO2 allowances fishery quotas, and water rights. Design and implementation of cap-and-trade mechanisms involves challenging policy tradeoffs: accommodating equity concerns, balancing use levels with resource conditions, facilitating transactions, accounting for externalities, assuring adequate monitoring, and documenting welfare gains. Efficient trading mechanisms are more readily implemented when there is a strong political or legal mandate to cap resource use and trades are perceived as a means to ease adjustment to use limits. (JEL Q28).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)358-638
Number of pages281
JournalLand Economics
Volume76
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

trade policy
market
resource use
equity
fishery
monitoring
resource
Trade policy
Cap and trade
water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Cap-and-trade policy challenges : A tale of three markets. / Colby, Bonnie G.

In: Land Economics, Vol. 76, No. 4, 2000, p. 358-638.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d29ce58c23364ad5948b1989bbfec101,
title = "Cap-and-trade policy challenges: A tale of three markets",
abstract = "Cap-and-trade policy instruments have been applied to a number of environmental problems, with varying success. This article examines cap-and-trade programs for SO2 allowances fishery quotas, and water rights. Design and implementation of cap-and-trade mechanisms involves challenging policy tradeoffs: accommodating equity concerns, balancing use levels with resource conditions, facilitating transactions, accounting for externalities, assuring adequate monitoring, and documenting welfare gains. Efficient trading mechanisms are more readily implemented when there is a strong political or legal mandate to cap resource use and trades are perceived as a means to ease adjustment to use limits. (JEL Q28).",
author = "Colby, {Bonnie G}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "358--638",
journal = "Land Economics",
issn = "0023-7639",
publisher = "University of Wisconsin Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cap-and-trade policy challenges

T2 - A tale of three markets

AU - Colby, Bonnie G

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Cap-and-trade policy instruments have been applied to a number of environmental problems, with varying success. This article examines cap-and-trade programs for SO2 allowances fishery quotas, and water rights. Design and implementation of cap-and-trade mechanisms involves challenging policy tradeoffs: accommodating equity concerns, balancing use levels with resource conditions, facilitating transactions, accounting for externalities, assuring adequate monitoring, and documenting welfare gains. Efficient trading mechanisms are more readily implemented when there is a strong political or legal mandate to cap resource use and trades are perceived as a means to ease adjustment to use limits. (JEL Q28).

AB - Cap-and-trade policy instruments have been applied to a number of environmental problems, with varying success. This article examines cap-and-trade programs for SO2 allowances fishery quotas, and water rights. Design and implementation of cap-and-trade mechanisms involves challenging policy tradeoffs: accommodating equity concerns, balancing use levels with resource conditions, facilitating transactions, accounting for externalities, assuring adequate monitoring, and documenting welfare gains. Efficient trading mechanisms are more readily implemented when there is a strong political or legal mandate to cap resource use and trades are perceived as a means to ease adjustment to use limits. (JEL Q28).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034471992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034471992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 358

EP - 638

JO - Land Economics

JF - Land Economics

SN - 0023-7639

IS - 4

ER -