Cardiac arrest in the catheterisation laboratory: A 5-year experience of using mechanical chest compressions to facilitate PCI during prolonged resuscitation efforts

Henrik Wagner, Christian J. Terkelsen, Hans Friberg, Jan Harnek, Karl B Kern, Jens Flensted Lassen, Goran K. Olivecrona

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

110 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Lengthy resuscitations in the catheterisation laboratory carry extremely high rates of mortality because it is essentially impossible to perform effective chest compressions during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a mechanical chest compression device, LUCAS™, in the catheterisation laboratory, in patients who suffered circulatory arrest requiring prolonged resuscitation. Materials and methods: The study population was comprised of patients who arrived alive to the catheterisation laboratory and then required mechanical chest compression at some time during the angiogram, PCI or pericardiocentesis between 2004 and 2008 at the Lund University Hospital. This is a retrospective registry analysis. Results: During the study period, a total of 3058 patients were treated with PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) of whom 118 were in cardiogenic shock and 81 required defibrillations. LUCAS™ was used in 43 patients (33 STEMI, 7 non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), 2 elective PCIs and 1 patient with tamponade). Five patients had tamponade due to myocardial rupture prior to PCI that was revealed at the start of the PCI, and all five died. Of the remaining 38 patients, 1 patient underwent a successful pericardiocentesis and 36 were treated with PCI. Eleven of these patients were discharged alive in good neurological condition. Conclusion: The use of mechanical chest compressions in the catheterisation laboratory allows for continued PCI or pericardiocentesis despite ongoing cardiac or circulatory arrest with artificially sustained circulation. It is unlikely that few, if any, of the patients would have survived without the use of mechanical chest compressions in the catheterisation laboratory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)383-387
Number of pages5
JournalResuscitation
Volume81
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Heart Arrest
Resuscitation
Catheterization
Thorax
Pericardiocentesis
Cardiogenic Shock
Registries
Rupture
Angiography
Equipment and Supplies
Mortality

Keywords

  • Cardiac arrest
  • Catheterisation laboratory
  • Mechanical chest compressions
  • PCI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Emergency
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Cardiac arrest in the catheterisation laboratory : A 5-year experience of using mechanical chest compressions to facilitate PCI during prolonged resuscitation efforts. / Wagner, Henrik; Terkelsen, Christian J.; Friberg, Hans; Harnek, Jan; Kern, Karl B; Lassen, Jens Flensted; Olivecrona, Goran K.

In: Resuscitation, Vol. 81, No. 4, 04.2010, p. 383-387.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wagner, Henrik ; Terkelsen, Christian J. ; Friberg, Hans ; Harnek, Jan ; Kern, Karl B ; Lassen, Jens Flensted ; Olivecrona, Goran K. / Cardiac arrest in the catheterisation laboratory : A 5-year experience of using mechanical chest compressions to facilitate PCI during prolonged resuscitation efforts. In: Resuscitation. 2010 ; Vol. 81, No. 4. pp. 383-387.
@article{0a0629242756488fa902a62efb4a49eb,
title = "Cardiac arrest in the catheterisation laboratory: A 5-year experience of using mechanical chest compressions to facilitate PCI during prolonged resuscitation efforts",
abstract = "Purpose: Lengthy resuscitations in the catheterisation laboratory carry extremely high rates of mortality because it is essentially impossible to perform effective chest compressions during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a mechanical chest compression device, LUCAS™, in the catheterisation laboratory, in patients who suffered circulatory arrest requiring prolonged resuscitation. Materials and methods: The study population was comprised of patients who arrived alive to the catheterisation laboratory and then required mechanical chest compression at some time during the angiogram, PCI or pericardiocentesis between 2004 and 2008 at the Lund University Hospital. This is a retrospective registry analysis. Results: During the study period, a total of 3058 patients were treated with PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) of whom 118 were in cardiogenic shock and 81 required defibrillations. LUCAS™ was used in 43 patients (33 STEMI, 7 non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), 2 elective PCIs and 1 patient with tamponade). Five patients had tamponade due to myocardial rupture prior to PCI that was revealed at the start of the PCI, and all five died. Of the remaining 38 patients, 1 patient underwent a successful pericardiocentesis and 36 were treated with PCI. Eleven of these patients were discharged alive in good neurological condition. Conclusion: The use of mechanical chest compressions in the catheterisation laboratory allows for continued PCI or pericardiocentesis despite ongoing cardiac or circulatory arrest with artificially sustained circulation. It is unlikely that few, if any, of the patients would have survived without the use of mechanical chest compressions in the catheterisation laboratory.",
keywords = "Cardiac arrest, Catheterisation laboratory, Mechanical chest compressions, PCI",
author = "Henrik Wagner and Terkelsen, {Christian J.} and Hans Friberg and Jan Harnek and Kern, {Karl B} and Lassen, {Jens Flensted} and Olivecrona, {Goran K.}",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "383--387",
journal = "Resuscitation",
issn = "0300-9572",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiac arrest in the catheterisation laboratory

T2 - A 5-year experience of using mechanical chest compressions to facilitate PCI during prolonged resuscitation efforts

AU - Wagner, Henrik

AU - Terkelsen, Christian J.

AU - Friberg, Hans

AU - Harnek, Jan

AU - Kern, Karl B

AU - Lassen, Jens Flensted

AU - Olivecrona, Goran K.

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Purpose: Lengthy resuscitations in the catheterisation laboratory carry extremely high rates of mortality because it is essentially impossible to perform effective chest compressions during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a mechanical chest compression device, LUCAS™, in the catheterisation laboratory, in patients who suffered circulatory arrest requiring prolonged resuscitation. Materials and methods: The study population was comprised of patients who arrived alive to the catheterisation laboratory and then required mechanical chest compression at some time during the angiogram, PCI or pericardiocentesis between 2004 and 2008 at the Lund University Hospital. This is a retrospective registry analysis. Results: During the study period, a total of 3058 patients were treated with PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) of whom 118 were in cardiogenic shock and 81 required defibrillations. LUCAS™ was used in 43 patients (33 STEMI, 7 non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), 2 elective PCIs and 1 patient with tamponade). Five patients had tamponade due to myocardial rupture prior to PCI that was revealed at the start of the PCI, and all five died. Of the remaining 38 patients, 1 patient underwent a successful pericardiocentesis and 36 were treated with PCI. Eleven of these patients were discharged alive in good neurological condition. Conclusion: The use of mechanical chest compressions in the catheterisation laboratory allows for continued PCI or pericardiocentesis despite ongoing cardiac or circulatory arrest with artificially sustained circulation. It is unlikely that few, if any, of the patients would have survived without the use of mechanical chest compressions in the catheterisation laboratory.

AB - Purpose: Lengthy resuscitations in the catheterisation laboratory carry extremely high rates of mortality because it is essentially impossible to perform effective chest compressions during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a mechanical chest compression device, LUCAS™, in the catheterisation laboratory, in patients who suffered circulatory arrest requiring prolonged resuscitation. Materials and methods: The study population was comprised of patients who arrived alive to the catheterisation laboratory and then required mechanical chest compression at some time during the angiogram, PCI or pericardiocentesis between 2004 and 2008 at the Lund University Hospital. This is a retrospective registry analysis. Results: During the study period, a total of 3058 patients were treated with PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) of whom 118 were in cardiogenic shock and 81 required defibrillations. LUCAS™ was used in 43 patients (33 STEMI, 7 non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), 2 elective PCIs and 1 patient with tamponade). Five patients had tamponade due to myocardial rupture prior to PCI that was revealed at the start of the PCI, and all five died. Of the remaining 38 patients, 1 patient underwent a successful pericardiocentesis and 36 were treated with PCI. Eleven of these patients were discharged alive in good neurological condition. Conclusion: The use of mechanical chest compressions in the catheterisation laboratory allows for continued PCI or pericardiocentesis despite ongoing cardiac or circulatory arrest with artificially sustained circulation. It is unlikely that few, if any, of the patients would have survived without the use of mechanical chest compressions in the catheterisation laboratory.

KW - Cardiac arrest

KW - Catheterisation laboratory

KW - Mechanical chest compressions

KW - PCI

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649324675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649324675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 20007005

AN - SCOPUS:77649324675

VL - 81

SP - 383

EP - 387

JO - Resuscitation

JF - Resuscitation

SN - 0300-9572

IS - 4

ER -