Cardiac receiving centers

Beyond hypothermia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of review: The role of cardiac arrest centers, more recently termed Cardiac Receiving Centers, in improving outcomes after successful resuscitation is becoming more and more convincing. But which of all the treatments provided by Cardiac Receiving Centers are most beneficial is less certain. This review examines the role of early coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in this regard. Recent findings: Cohort studies have consistently found that early coronary angiography is associated with improved long-term outcomes postcardiac arrest. The most common cause for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a myocardial ischemic event. Diagnosing and treating the underlying coronary trigger makes good physiological sense. The major issues are 'who' should undergo emergent coronary angiography and 'when' should it be done. Standard criteria such as ST segment elevation and precedent chest pains are not very sensitive in identifying those postcardiac arrest with an occluded or culprit lesion. As many as one in four postresuscitated patients without ST elevation have a significant culprit lesion, including at times an acutely occluded coronary. Cardiac Receiving Centers should have the capacity to perform emergent coronary angiography on every resuscitated patient who does not have an obvious noncardiac cause for their arrest. Summary: Emergent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention are the most important Cardiac Receiving Center treatments beyond hypothermia. Providing both of these essential postresuscitation therapies is the very purpose of such centers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)246-250
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent Opinion in Critical Care
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Hypothermia
Coronary Angiography
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Heart Arrest
Chest Pain
Resuscitation
Cohort Studies
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • cardiac arrest
  • cardiac receiving centers
  • coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention
  • hypothermia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Cardiac receiving centers : Beyond hypothermia. / Kern, Karl B.

In: Current Opinion in Critical Care, Vol. 18, No. 3, 06.2012, p. 246-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ae436b43a0174bb3b45bed2683db5a41,
title = "Cardiac receiving centers: Beyond hypothermia",
abstract = "Purpose of review: The role of cardiac arrest centers, more recently termed Cardiac Receiving Centers, in improving outcomes after successful resuscitation is becoming more and more convincing. But which of all the treatments provided by Cardiac Receiving Centers are most beneficial is less certain. This review examines the role of early coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in this regard. Recent findings: Cohort studies have consistently found that early coronary angiography is associated with improved long-term outcomes postcardiac arrest. The most common cause for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a myocardial ischemic event. Diagnosing and treating the underlying coronary trigger makes good physiological sense. The major issues are 'who' should undergo emergent coronary angiography and 'when' should it be done. Standard criteria such as ST segment elevation and precedent chest pains are not very sensitive in identifying those postcardiac arrest with an occluded or culprit lesion. As many as one in four postresuscitated patients without ST elevation have a significant culprit lesion, including at times an acutely occluded coronary. Cardiac Receiving Centers should have the capacity to perform emergent coronary angiography on every resuscitated patient who does not have an obvious noncardiac cause for their arrest. Summary: Emergent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention are the most important Cardiac Receiving Center treatments beyond hypothermia. Providing both of these essential postresuscitation therapies is the very purpose of such centers.",
keywords = "cardiac arrest, cardiac receiving centers, coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention, hypothermia",
author = "Kern, {Karl B}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/MCC.0b013e32835180d6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "246--250",
journal = "Current Opinion in Critical Care",
issn = "1070-5295",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiac receiving centers

T2 - Beyond hypothermia

AU - Kern, Karl B

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Purpose of review: The role of cardiac arrest centers, more recently termed Cardiac Receiving Centers, in improving outcomes after successful resuscitation is becoming more and more convincing. But which of all the treatments provided by Cardiac Receiving Centers are most beneficial is less certain. This review examines the role of early coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in this regard. Recent findings: Cohort studies have consistently found that early coronary angiography is associated with improved long-term outcomes postcardiac arrest. The most common cause for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a myocardial ischemic event. Diagnosing and treating the underlying coronary trigger makes good physiological sense. The major issues are 'who' should undergo emergent coronary angiography and 'when' should it be done. Standard criteria such as ST segment elevation and precedent chest pains are not very sensitive in identifying those postcardiac arrest with an occluded or culprit lesion. As many as one in four postresuscitated patients without ST elevation have a significant culprit lesion, including at times an acutely occluded coronary. Cardiac Receiving Centers should have the capacity to perform emergent coronary angiography on every resuscitated patient who does not have an obvious noncardiac cause for their arrest. Summary: Emergent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention are the most important Cardiac Receiving Center treatments beyond hypothermia. Providing both of these essential postresuscitation therapies is the very purpose of such centers.

AB - Purpose of review: The role of cardiac arrest centers, more recently termed Cardiac Receiving Centers, in improving outcomes after successful resuscitation is becoming more and more convincing. But which of all the treatments provided by Cardiac Receiving Centers are most beneficial is less certain. This review examines the role of early coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in this regard. Recent findings: Cohort studies have consistently found that early coronary angiography is associated with improved long-term outcomes postcardiac arrest. The most common cause for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a myocardial ischemic event. Diagnosing and treating the underlying coronary trigger makes good physiological sense. The major issues are 'who' should undergo emergent coronary angiography and 'when' should it be done. Standard criteria such as ST segment elevation and precedent chest pains are not very sensitive in identifying those postcardiac arrest with an occluded or culprit lesion. As many as one in four postresuscitated patients without ST elevation have a significant culprit lesion, including at times an acutely occluded coronary. Cardiac Receiving Centers should have the capacity to perform emergent coronary angiography on every resuscitated patient who does not have an obvious noncardiac cause for their arrest. Summary: Emergent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention are the most important Cardiac Receiving Center treatments beyond hypothermia. Providing both of these essential postresuscitation therapies is the very purpose of such centers.

KW - cardiac arrest

KW - cardiac receiving centers

KW - coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention

KW - hypothermia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861232829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861232829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32835180d6

DO - 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32835180d6

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 246

EP - 250

JO - Current Opinion in Critical Care

JF - Current Opinion in Critical Care

SN - 1070-5295

IS - 3

ER -