Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: Improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: A consensus statement from the American heart association

Peter A. Meaney, Bentley J Bobrow, Mary E. Mancini, Jim Christenson, Allan R. De Caen, Farhan Bhanji, Benjamin S. Abella, Monica E. Kleinman, Dana P. Edelson, Robert A. Berg, Tom P. Aufderheide, Venu Menon, Marion Leary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

391 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The '2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care' increased the focus on methods to ensure that high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is performed in all resuscitation attempts. There are 5 critical components of high-quality CPR: minimize interruptions in chest compressions, provide compressions of adequate rate and depth, avoid leaning between compressions, and avoid excessive ventilation. Although it is clear that high-quality CPR is the primary component in influencing survival from cardiac arrest, there is considerable variation in monitoring, implementation, and quality improvement. As such, CPR quality varies widely between systems and locations. Victims often do not receive high-quality CPR because of provider ambiguity in prioritization of resuscitative efforts during an arrest. This ambiguity also impedes the development of optimal systems of care to increase survival from cardiac arrest. This consensus statement addresses the following key areas of CPR quality for the trained rescuer: metrics of CPR performance; monitoring, feedback, and integration of the patient's response to CPR; team-level logistics to ensure performance of high-quality CPR; and continuous quality improvement on provider, team, and systems levels. Clear definitions of metrics and methods to consistently deliver and improve the quality of CPR will narrow the gap between resuscitation science and the victims, both in and out of the hospital, and lay the foundation for further improvements in the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)417-435
Number of pages19
JournalCirculation
Volume128
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 23 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

American Heart Association
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Resuscitation
Quality Improvement
Heart Arrest
Survival
Emergency Medical Services
Ventilation
Thorax

Keywords

  • AHA Scientific Statements
  • cardiac arrest
  • CPR
  • CPR quality
  • outcomes
  • resuscitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology (medical)
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality : Improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: A consensus statement from the American heart association. / Meaney, Peter A.; Bobrow, Bentley J; Mancini, Mary E.; Christenson, Jim; De Caen, Allan R.; Bhanji, Farhan; Abella, Benjamin S.; Kleinman, Monica E.; Edelson, Dana P.; Berg, Robert A.; Aufderheide, Tom P.; Menon, Venu; Leary, Marion.

In: Circulation, Vol. 128, No. 4, 23.07.2013, p. 417-435.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meaney, PA, Bobrow, BJ, Mancini, ME, Christenson, J, De Caen, AR, Bhanji, F, Abella, BS, Kleinman, ME, Edelson, DP, Berg, RA, Aufderheide, TP, Menon, V & Leary, M 2013, 'Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: Improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: A consensus statement from the American heart association', Circulation, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 417-435. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829d8654
Meaney, Peter A. ; Bobrow, Bentley J ; Mancini, Mary E. ; Christenson, Jim ; De Caen, Allan R. ; Bhanji, Farhan ; Abella, Benjamin S. ; Kleinman, Monica E. ; Edelson, Dana P. ; Berg, Robert A. ; Aufderheide, Tom P. ; Menon, Venu ; Leary, Marion. / Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality : Improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: A consensus statement from the American heart association. In: Circulation. 2013 ; Vol. 128, No. 4. pp. 417-435.
@article{431cdd8576d54a0e8ddbec7e5760fa41,
title = "Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: Improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: A consensus statement from the American heart association",
abstract = "The '2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care' increased the focus on methods to ensure that high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is performed in all resuscitation attempts. There are 5 critical components of high-quality CPR: minimize interruptions in chest compressions, provide compressions of adequate rate and depth, avoid leaning between compressions, and avoid excessive ventilation. Although it is clear that high-quality CPR is the primary component in influencing survival from cardiac arrest, there is considerable variation in monitoring, implementation, and quality improvement. As such, CPR quality varies widely between systems and locations. Victims often do not receive high-quality CPR because of provider ambiguity in prioritization of resuscitative efforts during an arrest. This ambiguity also impedes the development of optimal systems of care to increase survival from cardiac arrest. This consensus statement addresses the following key areas of CPR quality for the trained rescuer: metrics of CPR performance; monitoring, feedback, and integration of the patient's response to CPR; team-level logistics to ensure performance of high-quality CPR; and continuous quality improvement on provider, team, and systems levels. Clear definitions of metrics and methods to consistently deliver and improve the quality of CPR will narrow the gap between resuscitation science and the victims, both in and out of the hospital, and lay the foundation for further improvements in the future.",
keywords = "AHA Scientific Statements, cardiac arrest, CPR, CPR quality, outcomes, resuscitation",
author = "Meaney, {Peter A.} and Bobrow, {Bentley J} and Mancini, {Mary E.} and Jim Christenson and {De Caen}, {Allan R.} and Farhan Bhanji and Abella, {Benjamin S.} and Kleinman, {Monica E.} and Edelson, {Dana P.} and Berg, {Robert A.} and Aufderheide, {Tom P.} and Venu Menon and Marion Leary",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829d8654",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "128",
pages = "417--435",
journal = "Circulation",
issn = "0009-7322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality

T2 - Improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: A consensus statement from the American heart association

AU - Meaney, Peter A.

AU - Bobrow, Bentley J

AU - Mancini, Mary E.

AU - Christenson, Jim

AU - De Caen, Allan R.

AU - Bhanji, Farhan

AU - Abella, Benjamin S.

AU - Kleinman, Monica E.

AU - Edelson, Dana P.

AU - Berg, Robert A.

AU - Aufderheide, Tom P.

AU - Menon, Venu

AU - Leary, Marion

PY - 2013/7/23

Y1 - 2013/7/23

N2 - The '2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care' increased the focus on methods to ensure that high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is performed in all resuscitation attempts. There are 5 critical components of high-quality CPR: minimize interruptions in chest compressions, provide compressions of adequate rate and depth, avoid leaning between compressions, and avoid excessive ventilation. Although it is clear that high-quality CPR is the primary component in influencing survival from cardiac arrest, there is considerable variation in monitoring, implementation, and quality improvement. As such, CPR quality varies widely between systems and locations. Victims often do not receive high-quality CPR because of provider ambiguity in prioritization of resuscitative efforts during an arrest. This ambiguity also impedes the development of optimal systems of care to increase survival from cardiac arrest. This consensus statement addresses the following key areas of CPR quality for the trained rescuer: metrics of CPR performance; monitoring, feedback, and integration of the patient's response to CPR; team-level logistics to ensure performance of high-quality CPR; and continuous quality improvement on provider, team, and systems levels. Clear definitions of metrics and methods to consistently deliver and improve the quality of CPR will narrow the gap between resuscitation science and the victims, both in and out of the hospital, and lay the foundation for further improvements in the future.

AB - The '2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care' increased the focus on methods to ensure that high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is performed in all resuscitation attempts. There are 5 critical components of high-quality CPR: minimize interruptions in chest compressions, provide compressions of adequate rate and depth, avoid leaning between compressions, and avoid excessive ventilation. Although it is clear that high-quality CPR is the primary component in influencing survival from cardiac arrest, there is considerable variation in monitoring, implementation, and quality improvement. As such, CPR quality varies widely between systems and locations. Victims often do not receive high-quality CPR because of provider ambiguity in prioritization of resuscitative efforts during an arrest. This ambiguity also impedes the development of optimal systems of care to increase survival from cardiac arrest. This consensus statement addresses the following key areas of CPR quality for the trained rescuer: metrics of CPR performance; monitoring, feedback, and integration of the patient's response to CPR; team-level logistics to ensure performance of high-quality CPR; and continuous quality improvement on provider, team, and systems levels. Clear definitions of metrics and methods to consistently deliver and improve the quality of CPR will narrow the gap between resuscitation science and the victims, both in and out of the hospital, and lay the foundation for further improvements in the future.

KW - AHA Scientific Statements

KW - cardiac arrest

KW - CPR

KW - CPR quality

KW - outcomes

KW - resuscitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880707195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880707195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829d8654

DO - 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829d8654

M3 - Article

C2 - 23801105

AN - SCOPUS:84880707195

VL - 128

SP - 417

EP - 435

JO - Circulation

JF - Circulation

SN - 0009-7322

IS - 4

ER -