Causal diagrams and the logic of matched case-control studies

Eyal Shahar, Doron J. Shahar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is tempting to assume that confounding bias is eliminated by choosing controls that are identical to the cases on the matched confounder(s). We used causal diagrams to explain why such matching not only fails to remove confounding bias, but also adds colliding bias, and why both types of bias are removed by conditioning on the matched confounder(s). As in some publications, we trace the logic of matching to a possible tradeoff between effort and variance, not between effort and bias. Lastly, we explain why the analysis of a matched case-control study - regardless of the method of matching - is not conceptually different from that of an unmatched study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)137-144
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Epidemiology
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 14 2012

Fingerprint

Publications
Case-Control Studies

Keywords

  • Case-control study
  • Causal diagrams
  • Colliding bias
  • Confounding bias
  • Directed acyclic graphs
  • Matching
  • Variance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Causal diagrams and the logic of matched case-control studies. / Shahar, Eyal; Shahar, Doron J.

In: Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 14.05.2012, p. 137-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shahar, Eyal ; Shahar, Doron J. / Causal diagrams and the logic of matched case-control studies. In: Clinical Epidemiology. 2012 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 137-144.
@article{ce25e113498a4e5a9f64fe971cec2f72,
title = "Causal diagrams and the logic of matched case-control studies",
abstract = "It is tempting to assume that confounding bias is eliminated by choosing controls that are identical to the cases on the matched confounder(s). We used causal diagrams to explain why such matching not only fails to remove confounding bias, but also adds colliding bias, and why both types of bias are removed by conditioning on the matched confounder(s). As in some publications, we trace the logic of matching to a possible tradeoff between effort and variance, not between effort and bias. Lastly, we explain why the analysis of a matched case-control study - regardless of the method of matching - is not conceptually different from that of an unmatched study.",
keywords = "Case-control study, Causal diagrams, Colliding bias, Confounding bias, Directed acyclic graphs, Matching, Variance",
author = "Eyal Shahar and Shahar, {Doron J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "14",
doi = "10.2147/CLEP.S31271",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "137--144",
journal = "Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "1179-1349",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Causal diagrams and the logic of matched case-control studies

AU - Shahar, Eyal

AU - Shahar, Doron J.

PY - 2012/5/14

Y1 - 2012/5/14

N2 - It is tempting to assume that confounding bias is eliminated by choosing controls that are identical to the cases on the matched confounder(s). We used causal diagrams to explain why such matching not only fails to remove confounding bias, but also adds colliding bias, and why both types of bias are removed by conditioning on the matched confounder(s). As in some publications, we trace the logic of matching to a possible tradeoff between effort and variance, not between effort and bias. Lastly, we explain why the analysis of a matched case-control study - regardless of the method of matching - is not conceptually different from that of an unmatched study.

AB - It is tempting to assume that confounding bias is eliminated by choosing controls that are identical to the cases on the matched confounder(s). We used causal diagrams to explain why such matching not only fails to remove confounding bias, but also adds colliding bias, and why both types of bias are removed by conditioning on the matched confounder(s). As in some publications, we trace the logic of matching to a possible tradeoff between effort and variance, not between effort and bias. Lastly, we explain why the analysis of a matched case-control study - regardless of the method of matching - is not conceptually different from that of an unmatched study.

KW - Case-control study

KW - Causal diagrams

KW - Colliding bias

KW - Confounding bias

KW - Directed acyclic graphs

KW - Matching

KW - Variance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863942924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863942924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2147/CLEP.S31271

DO - 10.2147/CLEP.S31271

M3 - Article

C2 - 22701093

AN - SCOPUS:84863942924

VL - 4

SP - 137

EP - 144

JO - Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 1179-1349

IS - 1

ER -