Changes in the distribution of male and female wages accounting for employment composition using bounds

Richard Blundell, Amanda Gosling, Hidehiko Ichimura, Costas Meghir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

97 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines changes in the distribution of wages using bounds to allow for the impact of nonrandom selection into work. We show that worst case bounds can be informative. However, because employment rates in the United Kingdom are often low, they are not informative about changes in educational or gender wage differentials. Thus we explore ways to tighten these bounds using restrictions motivated from economic theory. With these assumptions, we find convincing evidence of an increase in inequality within education groups, changes in educational differentials, and increases in the relative wages of women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-363
Number of pages41
JournalEconometrica
Volume75
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Education
Wages
Economic theory
Employment rate
Relative wages
Gender wage differentials

Keywords

  • Bounds
  • Earnings
  • Inequality
  • Selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Changes in the distribution of male and female wages accounting for employment composition using bounds. / Blundell, Richard; Gosling, Amanda; Ichimura, Hidehiko; Meghir, Costas.

In: Econometrica, Vol. 75, No. 2, 01.03.2007, p. 323-363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blundell, Richard ; Gosling, Amanda ; Ichimura, Hidehiko ; Meghir, Costas. / Changes in the distribution of male and female wages accounting for employment composition using bounds. In: Econometrica. 2007 ; Vol. 75, No. 2. pp. 323-363.
@article{67c80483cdfb4e5d9a0aee2a645dfe19,
title = "Changes in the distribution of male and female wages accounting for employment composition using bounds",
abstract = "This paper examines changes in the distribution of wages using bounds to allow for the impact of nonrandom selection into work. We show that worst case bounds can be informative. However, because employment rates in the United Kingdom are often low, they are not informative about changes in educational or gender wage differentials. Thus we explore ways to tighten these bounds using restrictions motivated from economic theory. With these assumptions, we find convincing evidence of an increase in inequality within education groups, changes in educational differentials, and increases in the relative wages of women.",
keywords = "Bounds, Earnings, Inequality, Selection",
author = "Richard Blundell and Amanda Gosling and Hidehiko Ichimura and Costas Meghir",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00750.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "323--363",
journal = "Econometrica",
issn = "0012-9682",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changes in the distribution of male and female wages accounting for employment composition using bounds

AU - Blundell, Richard

AU - Gosling, Amanda

AU - Ichimura, Hidehiko

AU - Meghir, Costas

PY - 2007/3/1

Y1 - 2007/3/1

N2 - This paper examines changes in the distribution of wages using bounds to allow for the impact of nonrandom selection into work. We show that worst case bounds can be informative. However, because employment rates in the United Kingdom are often low, they are not informative about changes in educational or gender wage differentials. Thus we explore ways to tighten these bounds using restrictions motivated from economic theory. With these assumptions, we find convincing evidence of an increase in inequality within education groups, changes in educational differentials, and increases in the relative wages of women.

AB - This paper examines changes in the distribution of wages using bounds to allow for the impact of nonrandom selection into work. We show that worst case bounds can be informative. However, because employment rates in the United Kingdom are often low, they are not informative about changes in educational or gender wage differentials. Thus we explore ways to tighten these bounds using restrictions motivated from economic theory. With these assumptions, we find convincing evidence of an increase in inequality within education groups, changes in educational differentials, and increases in the relative wages of women.

KW - Bounds

KW - Earnings

KW - Inequality

KW - Selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847373773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847373773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00750.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00750.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33847373773

VL - 75

SP - 323

EP - 363

JO - Econometrica

JF - Econometrica

SN - 0012-9682

IS - 2

ER -