Characteristics of Effective Mentorship for Academic Surgeons

A Grounded Theory Model

Amalia Cochran, William B. Elder, Leigh A Neumayer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to describe characteristics of effective mentoring relationships in academic surgery based upon lived experiences of mid-career and senior female academic surgeons. BACKGROUND: Prior qualitative work describes characteristics of successful mentoring relationships. However, no model exists of effective mentorship that is specific to academic surgery. METHODS: The authors conducted in-depth interviews with mid-career and senior female US academic surgeons about the impact of mentoring on professional development during 2014 and 2015. Purposive selection aimed to maximize institutional, specialty, years in career, and racial diversity. Grounded theory method was used to generate a conceptual model of effective mentoring relationships. Data saturation occurred following 15 interviews. RESULTS: Interviewees described the need for multiple mentors over time with each mentor addressing a unique domain. Interviewees suggested that mentees should seek mentors who will serve as strategic advisors, who will be unselfish, and who engage with diverse mentees. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a need for multiple mentors across time and disciplines, and identified 3 key characteristics of effective mentoring relationships in academic surgery. Future work in this area should generate an operational definition of mentorship that supports quantitative evaluation of mentor and mentoring panel performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)269-274
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume269
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Mentors
Interviews
Grounded Theory
Surgeons
Mentoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Characteristics of Effective Mentorship for Academic Surgeons : A Grounded Theory Model. / Cochran, Amalia; Elder, William B.; Neumayer, Leigh A.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 269, No. 2, 01.02.2019, p. 269-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cochran, Amalia ; Elder, William B. ; Neumayer, Leigh A. / Characteristics of Effective Mentorship for Academic Surgeons : A Grounded Theory Model. In: Annals of Surgery. 2019 ; Vol. 269, No. 2. pp. 269-274.
@article{1509b197a4a348758bbecb1f2f4bad72,
title = "Characteristics of Effective Mentorship for Academic Surgeons: A Grounded Theory Model",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to describe characteristics of effective mentoring relationships in academic surgery based upon lived experiences of mid-career and senior female academic surgeons. BACKGROUND: Prior qualitative work describes characteristics of successful mentoring relationships. However, no model exists of effective mentorship that is specific to academic surgery. METHODS: The authors conducted in-depth interviews with mid-career and senior female US academic surgeons about the impact of mentoring on professional development during 2014 and 2015. Purposive selection aimed to maximize institutional, specialty, years in career, and racial diversity. Grounded theory method was used to generate a conceptual model of effective mentoring relationships. Data saturation occurred following 15 interviews. RESULTS: Interviewees described the need for multiple mentors over time with each mentor addressing a unique domain. Interviewees suggested that mentees should seek mentors who will serve as strategic advisors, who will be unselfish, and who engage with diverse mentees. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a need for multiple mentors across time and disciplines, and identified 3 key characteristics of effective mentoring relationships in academic surgery. Future work in this area should generate an operational definition of mentorship that supports quantitative evaluation of mentor and mentoring panel performance.",
author = "Amalia Cochran and Elder, {William B.} and Neumayer, {Leigh A}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SLA.0000000000002487",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "269",
pages = "269--274",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characteristics of Effective Mentorship for Academic Surgeons

T2 - A Grounded Theory Model

AU - Cochran, Amalia

AU - Elder, William B.

AU - Neumayer, Leigh A

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to describe characteristics of effective mentoring relationships in academic surgery based upon lived experiences of mid-career and senior female academic surgeons. BACKGROUND: Prior qualitative work describes characteristics of successful mentoring relationships. However, no model exists of effective mentorship that is specific to academic surgery. METHODS: The authors conducted in-depth interviews with mid-career and senior female US academic surgeons about the impact of mentoring on professional development during 2014 and 2015. Purposive selection aimed to maximize institutional, specialty, years in career, and racial diversity. Grounded theory method was used to generate a conceptual model of effective mentoring relationships. Data saturation occurred following 15 interviews. RESULTS: Interviewees described the need for multiple mentors over time with each mentor addressing a unique domain. Interviewees suggested that mentees should seek mentors who will serve as strategic advisors, who will be unselfish, and who engage with diverse mentees. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a need for multiple mentors across time and disciplines, and identified 3 key characteristics of effective mentoring relationships in academic surgery. Future work in this area should generate an operational definition of mentorship that supports quantitative evaluation of mentor and mentoring panel performance.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to describe characteristics of effective mentoring relationships in academic surgery based upon lived experiences of mid-career and senior female academic surgeons. BACKGROUND: Prior qualitative work describes characteristics of successful mentoring relationships. However, no model exists of effective mentorship that is specific to academic surgery. METHODS: The authors conducted in-depth interviews with mid-career and senior female US academic surgeons about the impact of mentoring on professional development during 2014 and 2015. Purposive selection aimed to maximize institutional, specialty, years in career, and racial diversity. Grounded theory method was used to generate a conceptual model of effective mentoring relationships. Data saturation occurred following 15 interviews. RESULTS: Interviewees described the need for multiple mentors over time with each mentor addressing a unique domain. Interviewees suggested that mentees should seek mentors who will serve as strategic advisors, who will be unselfish, and who engage with diverse mentees. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a need for multiple mentors across time and disciplines, and identified 3 key characteristics of effective mentoring relationships in academic surgery. Future work in this area should generate an operational definition of mentorship that supports quantitative evaluation of mentor and mentoring panel performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058961455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058961455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002487

DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002487

M3 - Article

VL - 269

SP - 269

EP - 274

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 2

ER -