Charles S. Peirce and the "Light of Nature

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The American polymath and logician Charles S. Peirce (1839-1914) spent much of his professional career working on geodetic measurements. Nevertheless, his very original studies of scientific inference have considerable relevance to geology. Particularly important influences on his views derive from his avid studies of the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment, notably the writings of Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) and Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). From Kant, Peirce derived an architectonic and categorical approach to philosophy. Following the example of the Cambridge mineralogist William Whewell (1794-1866), Peirce pursued the history of science in order to uncover the logic of scientific inquiry. His original reading of Galileo revealed that scholar's reliance upon il lume naturale ("the Light of Nature") as a guide toward the selection of potentially productive hypotheses from among the many that might be posed in regard to scientific explanation. This principle underpins Peirce's famous and controversial notion of abduction, or retroduction, i.e., informed guessing, as critical to scientific inquiry. The instinctive tendency of the experienced and informed scientist to "guess right" is essential to the historically demonstrated success of science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)259-266
Number of pages8
JournalMemoir of the Geological Society of America
Volume203
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

geology
history
science

Keywords

  • Abductive inference
  • Galileo
  • Hypotheses
  • Light of nature
  • Peirce
  • Philosophy of geology
  • Pragmatism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geology

Cite this

Charles S. Peirce and the "Light of Nature. / Baker, Victor.

In: Memoir of the Geological Society of America, Vol. 203, 2009, p. 259-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{94881b012c2c48c4adb0dbbac08fd1d5,
title = "Charles S. Peirce and the {"}Light of Nature",
abstract = "The American polymath and logician Charles S. Peirce (1839-1914) spent much of his professional career working on geodetic measurements. Nevertheless, his very original studies of scientific inference have considerable relevance to geology. Particularly important influences on his views derive from his avid studies of the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment, notably the writings of Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) and Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). From Kant, Peirce derived an architectonic and categorical approach to philosophy. Following the example of the Cambridge mineralogist William Whewell (1794-1866), Peirce pursued the history of science in order to uncover the logic of scientific inquiry. His original reading of Galileo revealed that scholar's reliance upon il lume naturale ({"}the Light of Nature{"}) as a guide toward the selection of potentially productive hypotheses from among the many that might be posed in regard to scientific explanation. This principle underpins Peirce's famous and controversial notion of abduction, or retroduction, i.e., informed guessing, as critical to scientific inquiry. The instinctive tendency of the experienced and informed scientist to {"}guess right{"} is essential to the historically demonstrated success of science.",
keywords = "Abductive inference, Galileo, Hypotheses, Light of nature, Peirce, Philosophy of geology, Pragmatism",
author = "Victor Baker",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1130/2009.1203(18)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "203",
pages = "259--266",
journal = "Memoir of the Geological Society of America",
issn = "0072-1069",
publisher = "Geological Society of America",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Charles S. Peirce and the "Light of Nature

AU - Baker, Victor

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The American polymath and logician Charles S. Peirce (1839-1914) spent much of his professional career working on geodetic measurements. Nevertheless, his very original studies of scientific inference have considerable relevance to geology. Particularly important influences on his views derive from his avid studies of the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment, notably the writings of Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) and Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). From Kant, Peirce derived an architectonic and categorical approach to philosophy. Following the example of the Cambridge mineralogist William Whewell (1794-1866), Peirce pursued the history of science in order to uncover the logic of scientific inquiry. His original reading of Galileo revealed that scholar's reliance upon il lume naturale ("the Light of Nature") as a guide toward the selection of potentially productive hypotheses from among the many that might be posed in regard to scientific explanation. This principle underpins Peirce's famous and controversial notion of abduction, or retroduction, i.e., informed guessing, as critical to scientific inquiry. The instinctive tendency of the experienced and informed scientist to "guess right" is essential to the historically demonstrated success of science.

AB - The American polymath and logician Charles S. Peirce (1839-1914) spent much of his professional career working on geodetic measurements. Nevertheless, his very original studies of scientific inference have considerable relevance to geology. Particularly important influences on his views derive from his avid studies of the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment, notably the writings of Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) and Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). From Kant, Peirce derived an architectonic and categorical approach to philosophy. Following the example of the Cambridge mineralogist William Whewell (1794-1866), Peirce pursued the history of science in order to uncover the logic of scientific inquiry. His original reading of Galileo revealed that scholar's reliance upon il lume naturale ("the Light of Nature") as a guide toward the selection of potentially productive hypotheses from among the many that might be posed in regard to scientific explanation. This principle underpins Peirce's famous and controversial notion of abduction, or retroduction, i.e., informed guessing, as critical to scientific inquiry. The instinctive tendency of the experienced and informed scientist to "guess right" is essential to the historically demonstrated success of science.

KW - Abductive inference

KW - Galileo

KW - Hypotheses

KW - Light of nature

KW - Peirce

KW - Philosophy of geology

KW - Pragmatism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949817214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949817214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1130/2009.1203(18)

DO - 10.1130/2009.1203(18)

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77949817214

VL - 203

SP - 259

EP - 266

JO - Memoir of the Geological Society of America

JF - Memoir of the Geological Society of America

SN - 0072-1069

ER -