Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia/febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with biosimilar filgrastim in solid tumors versus hematological malignancies: MONITOR-GCSF study

Heinz Ludwig, Carsten Bokemeyer, Matti Aapro, Mario Boccadoro, Pere Gascón, Kris Denhaerynck, Andriy Krendyukov, Ivo L Abraham, Karen Macdonald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to report patterns of biosimilar filgrastim prophylaxis and outcomes of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN)/febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with hematological malignancies or solid tumors. Patients & methods: MONITOR-GCSF is a real-world study of 1447 cancer patients receiving CIN/FN prophylaxis with biosimilar filgrastim (solid tumors: 77.2%; hematological malignancies: 22.8%). Results: Differences in prophylaxis intensity and day of initiation relative to guideline recommendations were observed. In hematology patients, higher rates of CIN and FN occurred at cycle level, and rate of FN was higher at patient level (9.1 vs 5.0% in solid tumor patients). Conclusion: Adequate GCSF support in hematology and solid tumor patients is important to prevent CIN/FN and related hospitalizations and chemotherapy disturbances.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)897-907
Number of pages11
JournalFuture Oncology
Volume15
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Keywords

  • biosimilar
  • filgrastim
  • granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
  • hematological malignancies
  • neutropenia
  • solid tumors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia/febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with biosimilar filgrastim in solid tumors versus hematological malignancies: MONITOR-GCSF study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this