Chiral indices of crystalline surfaces as a measure of enantioselective potential

Robert T. Downs, Robert M. Hazen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Chiral crystal surfaces lack mirror or glide plane symmetry. Nevertheless, some chiral surfaces deviate more significantly from an achiral configuration, and thus possess greater enantioselective potential, than others. We describe a procedure to calculate chiral indices, IC (in Å), of any two-dimensional (2D) periodic atomic surface based on atomic displacements from ideal mirror or glide plane symmetry. We define a 2D unit cell parallel to the surface, identify coordinates of atoms associated with that surface unit cell, and employ minimization procedures to determine the positions and orientations of best-fit pseudo-mirror and pseudo-glide plane operators perpendicular to that surface. Achiral surfaces invariably have IC=0, but we find that surfaces of intrinsically chiral crystals [e.g., quartz (1 0 1)] may also display IC=0, depending on the surface atoms selected. Of 14 surfaces modeled, IC is greatest for chiral faces of achiral crystals: the (2 1 4) scalenohedral faces of calcite (IC=2.60 Å), the (1 1 0) faces of diopside (IC=1.54 Å), and the (6 4 3) faces of FCC metals such as copper and platinum (IC=1.29 Å).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-285
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical
Volume216
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 12 2004

Keywords

  • Chiral indices
  • Crystalline surfaces
  • Enantioselective potential

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Catalysis
  • Process Chemistry and Technology
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Chiral indices of crystalline surfaces as a measure of enantioselective potential'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this