Choose to Fight or Choose to Flee? A Network Embeddedness Perspective of Executive Ship Jumping in Declining Firms

Han Jiang, Albert A. Cannella, Jun Xia, Matthew Semadeni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research summary: Executives in declining firms may engage in ship-jumping behavior (i.e., voluntarily move to new employers before the failure occurs) to avoid the stigma of failure. However, it is unclear how executives decide whether or not to jump ship. Building on a network embeddedness perspective, we highlight how three network-based indicators (i.e., executive social capital, the social capital of other peers in the declining firm, and the declining firm's alliance network) influence the executive-level ship-jumping decision by shaping its benefits and opportunity costs. Using data from executives at failing firms in China, we find support for our hypothesized relationships. Our research provides important insight into the network mechanisms driving the ship-jumping decision. Managerial summary: Executives at failing firms have a choice: stay and attempt to rescue the firm from failure or exit and avoid the stigma of the failure (i.e., jump ship). Yet, little is known about what factors affect this choice. We propose that social capital plays an important role in the decision. Our evidence from specially treated (*ST) public firms in China finds that ship jumping is lowest at low and high values of social capital, and highest at moderate levels of social capital (an inverted U-shaped relationship). In addition, higher levels of peer social capital (in the declining firm) as well as a well-established firm-level alliance network discourage the ship-jumping choice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2061-2079
Number of pages19
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Volume38
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Ship
Network embeddedness
Social capital
Stigma
Jump
Alliance network
Peers
China
Public firm
Factors
Exit
Inverted-U
Opportunity cost
Employers
Benefit-cost

Keywords

  • alliance networks
  • declining firms
  • executive social capital
  • jumping ship
  • peer social capital

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Choose to Fight or Choose to Flee? A Network Embeddedness Perspective of Executive Ship Jumping in Declining Firms. / Jiang, Han; Cannella, Albert A.; Xia, Jun; Semadeni, Matthew.

In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 10, 10.2017, p. 2061-2079.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jiang, Han ; Cannella, Albert A. ; Xia, Jun ; Semadeni, Matthew. / Choose to Fight or Choose to Flee? A Network Embeddedness Perspective of Executive Ship Jumping in Declining Firms. In: Strategic Management Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 38, No. 10. pp. 2061-2079.
@article{a230f5279d6c4edf8856088bfad2c544,
title = "Choose to Fight or Choose to Flee? A Network Embeddedness Perspective of Executive Ship Jumping in Declining Firms",
abstract = "Research summary: Executives in declining firms may engage in ship-jumping behavior (i.e., voluntarily move to new employers before the failure occurs) to avoid the stigma of failure. However, it is unclear how executives decide whether or not to jump ship. Building on a network embeddedness perspective, we highlight how three network-based indicators (i.e., executive social capital, the social capital of other peers in the declining firm, and the declining firm's alliance network) influence the executive-level ship-jumping decision by shaping its benefits and opportunity costs. Using data from executives at failing firms in China, we find support for our hypothesized relationships. Our research provides important insight into the network mechanisms driving the ship-jumping decision. Managerial summary: Executives at failing firms have a choice: stay and attempt to rescue the firm from failure or exit and avoid the stigma of the failure (i.e., jump ship). Yet, little is known about what factors affect this choice. We propose that social capital plays an important role in the decision. Our evidence from specially treated (*ST) public firms in China finds that ship jumping is lowest at low and high values of social capital, and highest at moderate levels of social capital (an inverted U-shaped relationship). In addition, higher levels of peer social capital (in the declining firm) as well as a well-established firm-level alliance network discourage the ship-jumping choice.",
keywords = "alliance networks, declining firms, executive social capital, jumping ship, peer social capital",
author = "Han Jiang and Cannella, {Albert A.} and Jun Xia and Matthew Semadeni",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1002/smj.2637",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "2061--2079",
journal = "Strategic Management Journal",
issn = "0143-2095",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Choose to Fight or Choose to Flee? A Network Embeddedness Perspective of Executive Ship Jumping in Declining Firms

AU - Jiang, Han

AU - Cannella, Albert A.

AU - Xia, Jun

AU - Semadeni, Matthew

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Research summary: Executives in declining firms may engage in ship-jumping behavior (i.e., voluntarily move to new employers before the failure occurs) to avoid the stigma of failure. However, it is unclear how executives decide whether or not to jump ship. Building on a network embeddedness perspective, we highlight how three network-based indicators (i.e., executive social capital, the social capital of other peers in the declining firm, and the declining firm's alliance network) influence the executive-level ship-jumping decision by shaping its benefits and opportunity costs. Using data from executives at failing firms in China, we find support for our hypothesized relationships. Our research provides important insight into the network mechanisms driving the ship-jumping decision. Managerial summary: Executives at failing firms have a choice: stay and attempt to rescue the firm from failure or exit and avoid the stigma of the failure (i.e., jump ship). Yet, little is known about what factors affect this choice. We propose that social capital plays an important role in the decision. Our evidence from specially treated (*ST) public firms in China finds that ship jumping is lowest at low and high values of social capital, and highest at moderate levels of social capital (an inverted U-shaped relationship). In addition, higher levels of peer social capital (in the declining firm) as well as a well-established firm-level alliance network discourage the ship-jumping choice.

AB - Research summary: Executives in declining firms may engage in ship-jumping behavior (i.e., voluntarily move to new employers before the failure occurs) to avoid the stigma of failure. However, it is unclear how executives decide whether or not to jump ship. Building on a network embeddedness perspective, we highlight how three network-based indicators (i.e., executive social capital, the social capital of other peers in the declining firm, and the declining firm's alliance network) influence the executive-level ship-jumping decision by shaping its benefits and opportunity costs. Using data from executives at failing firms in China, we find support for our hypothesized relationships. Our research provides important insight into the network mechanisms driving the ship-jumping decision. Managerial summary: Executives at failing firms have a choice: stay and attempt to rescue the firm from failure or exit and avoid the stigma of the failure (i.e., jump ship). Yet, little is known about what factors affect this choice. We propose that social capital plays an important role in the decision. Our evidence from specially treated (*ST) public firms in China finds that ship jumping is lowest at low and high values of social capital, and highest at moderate levels of social capital (an inverted U-shaped relationship). In addition, higher levels of peer social capital (in the declining firm) as well as a well-established firm-level alliance network discourage the ship-jumping choice.

KW - alliance networks

KW - declining firms

KW - executive social capital

KW - jumping ship

KW - peer social capital

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013665039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013665039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/smj.2637

DO - 10.1002/smj.2637

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85013665039

VL - 38

SP - 2061

EP - 2079

JO - Strategic Management Journal

JF - Strategic Management Journal

SN - 0143-2095

IS - 10

ER -