Choosing the geoscience major: Important factors, race/ethnicity, and gender

Philip J. Stokes, Roger Levine, Karl Flessa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Geoscience faces dual recruiting challenges: a pending workforce shortage and a lack of diversity. Already suffering from low visibility, geoscience does not resemble the makeup of the general population in terms of either race/ethnicity or gender and is among the least diverse of all science, technology, engineering, and math fields in the U.S. Many studies discuss recruiting and diversity issues in science and math, but only a small number consider—and address quantitatively—barriers in geoscience. We interviewed 31 current and former geoscience majors (18 women, 13 men; 8 Hispanics, 21 whites) at a large university in the southwestern U.S. to collect 926 “critical incidents,” or experiences that affected choice of major. These critical incidents were classified, sorted, and analyzed by race/ethnicity and gender. We found that positive experiences in introductory courses, supportive family members, personal characteristics that meshed with geoscience, and outstanding field experiences were the most commonly reported factors influencing the choice of a geoscience major. Though our sample was not large, we interpret these factors as crucial tools for improving recruitment and retention. Hispanic students reported more familial factors, and more negative familial factors, than white students. Hispanic students also reported fewer informal outdoor experiences and fewer incidents involving personal factors. Men reported more critical incidents related to career and economic factors than women. Women reported more negative experiences than men in required nongeoscience courses. These findings suggest that sociocultural factors behind underrepresentation in other fields may similarly impede diversity in geoscience. Although geoscience majors share many common experiences, knowledge of subtle barriers that may exist for only Hispanic students and women in geoscience can inform recruiting, teaching, and advisement strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)250-263
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Geoscience Education
Volume63
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

ethnicity
gender
student
incident
experience
visibility
teaching
sociocultural factors
science
engineering
economic factors
shortage
family member
woman
economics
career
university
lack
Teaching

Keywords

  • Critical incidents
  • Diversity
  • Hispanic
  • Latino
  • Recruiting
  • Women

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Choosing the geoscience major : Important factors, race/ethnicity, and gender. / Stokes, Philip J.; Levine, Roger; Flessa, Karl.

In: Journal of Geoscience Education, Vol. 63, No. 3, 01.08.2015, p. 250-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0bc83ed82277421186a86ecc7262f6be,
title = "Choosing the geoscience major: Important factors, race/ethnicity, and gender",
abstract = "Geoscience faces dual recruiting challenges: a pending workforce shortage and a lack of diversity. Already suffering from low visibility, geoscience does not resemble the makeup of the general population in terms of either race/ethnicity or gender and is among the least diverse of all science, technology, engineering, and math fields in the U.S. Many studies discuss recruiting and diversity issues in science and math, but only a small number consider—and address quantitatively—barriers in geoscience. We interviewed 31 current and former geoscience majors (18 women, 13 men; 8 Hispanics, 21 whites) at a large university in the southwestern U.S. to collect 926 “critical incidents,” or experiences that affected choice of major. These critical incidents were classified, sorted, and analyzed by race/ethnicity and gender. We found that positive experiences in introductory courses, supportive family members, personal characteristics that meshed with geoscience, and outstanding field experiences were the most commonly reported factors influencing the choice of a geoscience major. Though our sample was not large, we interpret these factors as crucial tools for improving recruitment and retention. Hispanic students reported more familial factors, and more negative familial factors, than white students. Hispanic students also reported fewer informal outdoor experiences and fewer incidents involving personal factors. Men reported more critical incidents related to career and economic factors than women. Women reported more negative experiences than men in required nongeoscience courses. These findings suggest that sociocultural factors behind underrepresentation in other fields may similarly impede diversity in geoscience. Although geoscience majors share many common experiences, knowledge of subtle barriers that may exist for only Hispanic students and women in geoscience can inform recruiting, teaching, and advisement strategies.",
keywords = "Critical incidents, Diversity, Hispanic, Latino, Recruiting, Women",
author = "Stokes, {Philip J.} and Roger Levine and Karl Flessa",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5408/14-038.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "250--263",
journal = "Journal of Geoscience Education",
issn = "1089-9995",
publisher = "National Association of Geoscience Teachers Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Choosing the geoscience major

T2 - Important factors, race/ethnicity, and gender

AU - Stokes, Philip J.

AU - Levine, Roger

AU - Flessa, Karl

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Geoscience faces dual recruiting challenges: a pending workforce shortage and a lack of diversity. Already suffering from low visibility, geoscience does not resemble the makeup of the general population in terms of either race/ethnicity or gender and is among the least diverse of all science, technology, engineering, and math fields in the U.S. Many studies discuss recruiting and diversity issues in science and math, but only a small number consider—and address quantitatively—barriers in geoscience. We interviewed 31 current and former geoscience majors (18 women, 13 men; 8 Hispanics, 21 whites) at a large university in the southwestern U.S. to collect 926 “critical incidents,” or experiences that affected choice of major. These critical incidents were classified, sorted, and analyzed by race/ethnicity and gender. We found that positive experiences in introductory courses, supportive family members, personal characteristics that meshed with geoscience, and outstanding field experiences were the most commonly reported factors influencing the choice of a geoscience major. Though our sample was not large, we interpret these factors as crucial tools for improving recruitment and retention. Hispanic students reported more familial factors, and more negative familial factors, than white students. Hispanic students also reported fewer informal outdoor experiences and fewer incidents involving personal factors. Men reported more critical incidents related to career and economic factors than women. Women reported more negative experiences than men in required nongeoscience courses. These findings suggest that sociocultural factors behind underrepresentation in other fields may similarly impede diversity in geoscience. Although geoscience majors share many common experiences, knowledge of subtle barriers that may exist for only Hispanic students and women in geoscience can inform recruiting, teaching, and advisement strategies.

AB - Geoscience faces dual recruiting challenges: a pending workforce shortage and a lack of diversity. Already suffering from low visibility, geoscience does not resemble the makeup of the general population in terms of either race/ethnicity or gender and is among the least diverse of all science, technology, engineering, and math fields in the U.S. Many studies discuss recruiting and diversity issues in science and math, but only a small number consider—and address quantitatively—barriers in geoscience. We interviewed 31 current and former geoscience majors (18 women, 13 men; 8 Hispanics, 21 whites) at a large university in the southwestern U.S. to collect 926 “critical incidents,” or experiences that affected choice of major. These critical incidents were classified, sorted, and analyzed by race/ethnicity and gender. We found that positive experiences in introductory courses, supportive family members, personal characteristics that meshed with geoscience, and outstanding field experiences were the most commonly reported factors influencing the choice of a geoscience major. Though our sample was not large, we interpret these factors as crucial tools for improving recruitment and retention. Hispanic students reported more familial factors, and more negative familial factors, than white students. Hispanic students also reported fewer informal outdoor experiences and fewer incidents involving personal factors. Men reported more critical incidents related to career and economic factors than women. Women reported more negative experiences than men in required nongeoscience courses. These findings suggest that sociocultural factors behind underrepresentation in other fields may similarly impede diversity in geoscience. Although geoscience majors share many common experiences, knowledge of subtle barriers that may exist for only Hispanic students and women in geoscience can inform recruiting, teaching, and advisement strategies.

KW - Critical incidents

KW - Diversity

KW - Hispanic

KW - Latino

KW - Recruiting

KW - Women

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941347985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941347985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5408/14-038.1

DO - 10.5408/14-038.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84941347985

VL - 63

SP - 250

EP - 263

JO - Journal of Geoscience Education

JF - Journal of Geoscience Education

SN - 1089-9995

IS - 3

ER -