Cigarette Use Among American Indians and Alaska Natives in Metropolitan Areas, Rural Areas, and Tribal Lands

James K. Cunningham, Jamie Ritchey, Teshia A. Solomon, Felina M. Cordova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

CONTEXT: Cigarette use among the US general population is significantly lower in metropolitan areas than in rural areas. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether cigarette use among American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/AN) is lower in metropolitan areas than in rural areas and tribal lands (which are predominantly rural). DESIGN: Data came from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2012-2016). Regressions with adjustments for demographics were performed to assess whether cigarette use differed in association with type of place. SETTINGS: The AI/AN in tribal lands (n = 1569), nontribal large metropolitan (1+ million people) areas (n = 582), nontribal small metropolitan (<1 million) areas (n = 1035), and nontribal rural areas (n = 1043). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cigarette abstinence, current smoking, daily use, number of cigarettes used, and days of use-all in the past month. Nicotine dependence was also examined. RESULTS: Metropolitan (large or small) areas versus rural areas: no statistically significant differences in cigarette use were found. Metropolitan (large or small) areas versus tribal lands: days of cigarette use and daily use were significantly lower in tribal lands. Tribal lands were also lower than small metropolitan areas regarding number of cigarettes used and nicotine dependence. Rural areas versus tribal lands: cigarette measures were consistently lower in tribal lands. For example, the prevalence of current smokers, daily users and nicotine dependence, respectively, was 37.9%, 25.9%, and 16.3% in rural areas and 27.4%, 13.6%, and 8.9% in tribal lands. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in cigarette use between AI/AN in nontribal rural and metropolitan areas were not indicated. Instead, the place differences found were lower cigarette use in tribal lands than in nontribal rural areas and, to some extent, metropolitan areas. These findings can help inform policy makers working to develop context-sensitive anticommercial tobacco efforts for AI/AN.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S11-S19
JournalJournal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
Volume25 , Tribal Epidemiology Centers: Advancing Public Health in Indian Country for Over 20 Years
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

North American Indians
Tobacco Products
Tobacco Use Disorder
Alaska Natives
Administrative Personnel
Tobacco
Smoking
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Cigarette Use Among American Indians and Alaska Natives in Metropolitan Areas, Rural Areas, and Tribal Lands. / Cunningham, James K.; Ritchey, Jamie; Solomon, Teshia A.; Cordova, Felina M.

In: Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP, Vol. 25 , Tribal Epidemiology Centers: Advancing Public Health in Indian Country for Over 20 Years, 01.09.2019, p. S11-S19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cunningham, James K. ; Ritchey, Jamie ; Solomon, Teshia A. ; Cordova, Felina M. / Cigarette Use Among American Indians and Alaska Natives in Metropolitan Areas, Rural Areas, and Tribal Lands. In: Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP. 2019 ; Vol. 25 , Tribal Epidemiology Centers: Advancing Public Health in Indian Country for Over 20 Years. pp. S11-S19.
@article{ebf7bcbaf6454389b1dda77d48ac3723,
title = "Cigarette Use Among American Indians and Alaska Natives in Metropolitan Areas, Rural Areas, and Tribal Lands",
abstract = "CONTEXT: Cigarette use among the US general population is significantly lower in metropolitan areas than in rural areas. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether cigarette use among American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/AN) is lower in metropolitan areas than in rural areas and tribal lands (which are predominantly rural). DESIGN: Data came from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2012-2016). Regressions with adjustments for demographics were performed to assess whether cigarette use differed in association with type of place. SETTINGS: The AI/AN in tribal lands (n = 1569), nontribal large metropolitan (1+ million people) areas (n = 582), nontribal small metropolitan (<1 million) areas (n = 1035), and nontribal rural areas (n = 1043). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cigarette abstinence, current smoking, daily use, number of cigarettes used, and days of use-all in the past month. Nicotine dependence was also examined. RESULTS: Metropolitan (large or small) areas versus rural areas: no statistically significant differences in cigarette use were found. Metropolitan (large or small) areas versus tribal lands: days of cigarette use and daily use were significantly lower in tribal lands. Tribal lands were also lower than small metropolitan areas regarding number of cigarettes used and nicotine dependence. Rural areas versus tribal lands: cigarette measures were consistently lower in tribal lands. For example, the prevalence of current smokers, daily users and nicotine dependence, respectively, was 37.9{\%}, 25.9{\%}, and 16.3{\%} in rural areas and 27.4{\%}, 13.6{\%}, and 8.9{\%} in tribal lands. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in cigarette use between AI/AN in nontribal rural and metropolitan areas were not indicated. Instead, the place differences found were lower cigarette use in tribal lands than in nontribal rural areas and, to some extent, metropolitan areas. These findings can help inform policy makers working to develop context-sensitive anticommercial tobacco efforts for AI/AN.",
author = "Cunningham, {James K.} and Jamie Ritchey and Solomon, {Teshia A.} and Cordova, {Felina M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0000000000001026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25 , Tribal Epidemiology Centers: Advancing Public Health in Indian Country for Over 20 Years",
pages = "S11--S19",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cigarette Use Among American Indians and Alaska Natives in Metropolitan Areas, Rural Areas, and Tribal Lands

AU - Cunningham, James K.

AU - Ritchey, Jamie

AU - Solomon, Teshia A.

AU - Cordova, Felina M.

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - CONTEXT: Cigarette use among the US general population is significantly lower in metropolitan areas than in rural areas. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether cigarette use among American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/AN) is lower in metropolitan areas than in rural areas and tribal lands (which are predominantly rural). DESIGN: Data came from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2012-2016). Regressions with adjustments for demographics were performed to assess whether cigarette use differed in association with type of place. SETTINGS: The AI/AN in tribal lands (n = 1569), nontribal large metropolitan (1+ million people) areas (n = 582), nontribal small metropolitan (<1 million) areas (n = 1035), and nontribal rural areas (n = 1043). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cigarette abstinence, current smoking, daily use, number of cigarettes used, and days of use-all in the past month. Nicotine dependence was also examined. RESULTS: Metropolitan (large or small) areas versus rural areas: no statistically significant differences in cigarette use were found. Metropolitan (large or small) areas versus tribal lands: days of cigarette use and daily use were significantly lower in tribal lands. Tribal lands were also lower than small metropolitan areas regarding number of cigarettes used and nicotine dependence. Rural areas versus tribal lands: cigarette measures were consistently lower in tribal lands. For example, the prevalence of current smokers, daily users and nicotine dependence, respectively, was 37.9%, 25.9%, and 16.3% in rural areas and 27.4%, 13.6%, and 8.9% in tribal lands. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in cigarette use between AI/AN in nontribal rural and metropolitan areas were not indicated. Instead, the place differences found were lower cigarette use in tribal lands than in nontribal rural areas and, to some extent, metropolitan areas. These findings can help inform policy makers working to develop context-sensitive anticommercial tobacco efforts for AI/AN.

AB - CONTEXT: Cigarette use among the US general population is significantly lower in metropolitan areas than in rural areas. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether cigarette use among American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/AN) is lower in metropolitan areas than in rural areas and tribal lands (which are predominantly rural). DESIGN: Data came from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2012-2016). Regressions with adjustments for demographics were performed to assess whether cigarette use differed in association with type of place. SETTINGS: The AI/AN in tribal lands (n = 1569), nontribal large metropolitan (1+ million people) areas (n = 582), nontribal small metropolitan (<1 million) areas (n = 1035), and nontribal rural areas (n = 1043). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cigarette abstinence, current smoking, daily use, number of cigarettes used, and days of use-all in the past month. Nicotine dependence was also examined. RESULTS: Metropolitan (large or small) areas versus rural areas: no statistically significant differences in cigarette use were found. Metropolitan (large or small) areas versus tribal lands: days of cigarette use and daily use were significantly lower in tribal lands. Tribal lands were also lower than small metropolitan areas regarding number of cigarettes used and nicotine dependence. Rural areas versus tribal lands: cigarette measures were consistently lower in tribal lands. For example, the prevalence of current smokers, daily users and nicotine dependence, respectively, was 37.9%, 25.9%, and 16.3% in rural areas and 27.4%, 13.6%, and 8.9% in tribal lands. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in cigarette use between AI/AN in nontribal rural and metropolitan areas were not indicated. Instead, the place differences found were lower cigarette use in tribal lands than in nontribal rural areas and, to some extent, metropolitan areas. These findings can help inform policy makers working to develop context-sensitive anticommercial tobacco efforts for AI/AN.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070597960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070597960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001026

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001026

M3 - Article

C2 - 31348186

AN - SCOPUS:85070597960

VL - 25 , Tribal Epidemiology Centers: Advancing Public Health in Indian Country for Over 20 Years

SP - S11-S19

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

ER -