Classification and surgical decision making in acute subaxial cervical spine trauma

Alpesh A. Patel, R. John Hurlbert, Christopher M. Bono, Jason T. Bessey, Nuo Yang, Alexander R. Vaccaro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. Retrospective case series, literature review. Objective. To describe and apply an optimal classification system for the management of subaxial cervical trauma. Summary of Background Data. Traumatic injury to the subaxial cervical trauma is common yet diagnosis and treatment choices remain controversial. The lack of a widely accepted classification system contributes to the variation in care. Methods. Two clinically relevant questions pertaining to the subaxial spine were developed by consensus from a panel of fellowship-trained spine trauma surgeons. A literature review identified published treatment algorithms for subaxial cervical trauma. Consecutive cases presenting to 2 tertiary trauma centers representing a spectrum of commonly observed, clinically relevant injury patterns were analyzed and the subaxial cervical injury classification system (SLIC) applied. Three representative clinical scenarios of subaxial trauma are presented to demonstrate utilization of the treatment algorithm. Results. Literature review identified only 1 classification and treatment algorithm that met all inclusion criteria. Sixty-five consecutive subaxial cervical trauma cases were identified from which 10 representative injury patterns were selected and described according to the SLIC classification system. This was applied to clinical scenarios and treatment algorithms derived. Conclusion. The SLIC system can be used to reliably and effectively classify subaxial cervical trauma. The treatment algorithm described by Dvorak et al, Spine 2007;32:2620-9, can be used to guide surgical decision-making including surgical approach and the sequence of procedures based on injury type.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S228-S234
JournalSpine
Volume35
Issue number21 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Spine
Wounds and Injuries
Therapeutics
Trauma Centers
Consensus

Keywords

  • adult
  • cervical spine
  • classification
  • fracture
  • spinal cord injury
  • trauma
  • treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Patel, A. A., Hurlbert, R. J., Bono, C. M., Bessey, J. T., Yang, N., & Vaccaro, A. R. (2010). Classification and surgical decision making in acute subaxial cervical spine trauma. Spine, 35(21 SUPPL.), S228-S234. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f330ae

Classification and surgical decision making in acute subaxial cervical spine trauma. / Patel, Alpesh A.; Hurlbert, R. John; Bono, Christopher M.; Bessey, Jason T.; Yang, Nuo; Vaccaro, Alexander R.

In: Spine, Vol. 35, No. 21 SUPPL., 01.10.2010, p. S228-S234.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patel, AA, Hurlbert, RJ, Bono, CM, Bessey, JT, Yang, N & Vaccaro, AR 2010, 'Classification and surgical decision making in acute subaxial cervical spine trauma', Spine, vol. 35, no. 21 SUPPL., pp. S228-S234. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f330ae
Patel, Alpesh A. ; Hurlbert, R. John ; Bono, Christopher M. ; Bessey, Jason T. ; Yang, Nuo ; Vaccaro, Alexander R. / Classification and surgical decision making in acute subaxial cervical spine trauma. In: Spine. 2010 ; Vol. 35, No. 21 SUPPL. pp. S228-S234.
@article{d0c81d8b6ede4ed9ba7580c9c539623a,
title = "Classification and surgical decision making in acute subaxial cervical spine trauma",
abstract = "Study Design. Retrospective case series, literature review. Objective. To describe and apply an optimal classification system for the management of subaxial cervical trauma. Summary of Background Data. Traumatic injury to the subaxial cervical trauma is common yet diagnosis and treatment choices remain controversial. The lack of a widely accepted classification system contributes to the variation in care. Methods. Two clinically relevant questions pertaining to the subaxial spine were developed by consensus from a panel of fellowship-trained spine trauma surgeons. A literature review identified published treatment algorithms for subaxial cervical trauma. Consecutive cases presenting to 2 tertiary trauma centers representing a spectrum of commonly observed, clinically relevant injury patterns were analyzed and the subaxial cervical injury classification system (SLIC) applied. Three representative clinical scenarios of subaxial trauma are presented to demonstrate utilization of the treatment algorithm. Results. Literature review identified only 1 classification and treatment algorithm that met all inclusion criteria. Sixty-five consecutive subaxial cervical trauma cases were identified from which 10 representative injury patterns were selected and described according to the SLIC classification system. This was applied to clinical scenarios and treatment algorithms derived. Conclusion. The SLIC system can be used to reliably and effectively classify subaxial cervical trauma. The treatment algorithm described by Dvorak et al, Spine 2007;32:2620-9, can be used to guide surgical decision-making including surgical approach and the sequence of procedures based on injury type.",
keywords = "adult, cervical spine, classification, fracture, spinal cord injury, trauma, treatment",
author = "Patel, {Alpesh A.} and Hurlbert, {R. John} and Bono, {Christopher M.} and Bessey, {Jason T.} and Nuo Yang and Vaccaro, {Alexander R.}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f330ae",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "S228--S234",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "21 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classification and surgical decision making in acute subaxial cervical spine trauma

AU - Patel, Alpesh A.

AU - Hurlbert, R. John

AU - Bono, Christopher M.

AU - Bessey, Jason T.

AU - Yang, Nuo

AU - Vaccaro, Alexander R.

PY - 2010/10/1

Y1 - 2010/10/1

N2 - Study Design. Retrospective case series, literature review. Objective. To describe and apply an optimal classification system for the management of subaxial cervical trauma. Summary of Background Data. Traumatic injury to the subaxial cervical trauma is common yet diagnosis and treatment choices remain controversial. The lack of a widely accepted classification system contributes to the variation in care. Methods. Two clinically relevant questions pertaining to the subaxial spine were developed by consensus from a panel of fellowship-trained spine trauma surgeons. A literature review identified published treatment algorithms for subaxial cervical trauma. Consecutive cases presenting to 2 tertiary trauma centers representing a spectrum of commonly observed, clinically relevant injury patterns were analyzed and the subaxial cervical injury classification system (SLIC) applied. Three representative clinical scenarios of subaxial trauma are presented to demonstrate utilization of the treatment algorithm. Results. Literature review identified only 1 classification and treatment algorithm that met all inclusion criteria. Sixty-five consecutive subaxial cervical trauma cases were identified from which 10 representative injury patterns were selected and described according to the SLIC classification system. This was applied to clinical scenarios and treatment algorithms derived. Conclusion. The SLIC system can be used to reliably and effectively classify subaxial cervical trauma. The treatment algorithm described by Dvorak et al, Spine 2007;32:2620-9, can be used to guide surgical decision-making including surgical approach and the sequence of procedures based on injury type.

AB - Study Design. Retrospective case series, literature review. Objective. To describe and apply an optimal classification system for the management of subaxial cervical trauma. Summary of Background Data. Traumatic injury to the subaxial cervical trauma is common yet diagnosis and treatment choices remain controversial. The lack of a widely accepted classification system contributes to the variation in care. Methods. Two clinically relevant questions pertaining to the subaxial spine were developed by consensus from a panel of fellowship-trained spine trauma surgeons. A literature review identified published treatment algorithms for subaxial cervical trauma. Consecutive cases presenting to 2 tertiary trauma centers representing a spectrum of commonly observed, clinically relevant injury patterns were analyzed and the subaxial cervical injury classification system (SLIC) applied. Three representative clinical scenarios of subaxial trauma are presented to demonstrate utilization of the treatment algorithm. Results. Literature review identified only 1 classification and treatment algorithm that met all inclusion criteria. Sixty-five consecutive subaxial cervical trauma cases were identified from which 10 representative injury patterns were selected and described according to the SLIC classification system. This was applied to clinical scenarios and treatment algorithms derived. Conclusion. The SLIC system can be used to reliably and effectively classify subaxial cervical trauma. The treatment algorithm described by Dvorak et al, Spine 2007;32:2620-9, can be used to guide surgical decision-making including surgical approach and the sequence of procedures based on injury type.

KW - adult

KW - cervical spine

KW - classification

KW - fracture

KW - spinal cord injury

KW - trauma

KW - treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957993324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957993324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f330ae

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f330ae

M3 - Article

C2 - 20881466

AN - SCOPUS:77957993324

VL - 35

SP - S228-S234

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 21 SUPPL.

ER -