Classification of chemical substances using particulate representations of matter: An analysis of student thinking

Marilyne Stains, Vicente A Talanquer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We applied a mixed-method research design to investigate the patterns of reasoning used by novice undergraduate chemistry students to classify chemical substances as elements, compounds, or mixtures based on their particulate representations. We were interested in the identification of the representational features that students use to build a classification system, and in the characterization of the thinking processes that they follow to group substances in different classes. Students in our study used structural and chemical composition features to classify chemical substances into elements, compounds, and mixtures. Many of the students' classification errors resulted from strong mental associations between concepts (e.g., atom-element, molecule-compound) or from lack of conceptual differentiation (e.g., compound-mixture). Strong concept associations led novice students to reduce the number of relevant features used to differentiate between substances, while the inability to discriminate between two concepts (conceptual undifferentiation) led them to pay too much attention to irrelevant features during the classification tasks. Comparisons of the responses to classification tasks of students with different levels of expertise in chemistry indicate that some of these naïve patterns of reasoning may be strengthened by, rather than weakened by, training in the discipline.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)643-661
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Science Education
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2007

Fingerprint

student
chemistry
research planning
expertise
lack
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{8dc0c586f4fa448ba4dbe8643659b17e,
title = "Classification of chemical substances using particulate representations of matter: An analysis of student thinking",
abstract = "We applied a mixed-method research design to investigate the patterns of reasoning used by novice undergraduate chemistry students to classify chemical substances as elements, compounds, or mixtures based on their particulate representations. We were interested in the identification of the representational features that students use to build a classification system, and in the characterization of the thinking processes that they follow to group substances in different classes. Students in our study used structural and chemical composition features to classify chemical substances into elements, compounds, and mixtures. Many of the students' classification errors resulted from strong mental associations between concepts (e.g., atom-element, molecule-compound) or from lack of conceptual differentiation (e.g., compound-mixture). Strong concept associations led novice students to reduce the number of relevant features used to differentiate between substances, while the inability to discriminate between two concepts (conceptual undifferentiation) led them to pay too much attention to irrelevant features during the classification tasks. Comparisons of the responses to classification tasks of students with different levels of expertise in chemistry indicate that some of these na{\"i}ve patterns of reasoning may be strengthened by, rather than weakened by, training in the discipline.",
author = "Marilyne Stains and Talanquer, {Vicente A}",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/09500690600931129",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "643--661",
journal = "International Journal of Science Education",
issn = "0950-0693",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classification of chemical substances using particulate representations of matter

T2 - An analysis of student thinking

AU - Stains, Marilyne

AU - Talanquer, Vicente A

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - We applied a mixed-method research design to investigate the patterns of reasoning used by novice undergraduate chemistry students to classify chemical substances as elements, compounds, or mixtures based on their particulate representations. We were interested in the identification of the representational features that students use to build a classification system, and in the characterization of the thinking processes that they follow to group substances in different classes. Students in our study used structural and chemical composition features to classify chemical substances into elements, compounds, and mixtures. Many of the students' classification errors resulted from strong mental associations between concepts (e.g., atom-element, molecule-compound) or from lack of conceptual differentiation (e.g., compound-mixture). Strong concept associations led novice students to reduce the number of relevant features used to differentiate between substances, while the inability to discriminate between two concepts (conceptual undifferentiation) led them to pay too much attention to irrelevant features during the classification tasks. Comparisons of the responses to classification tasks of students with different levels of expertise in chemistry indicate that some of these naïve patterns of reasoning may be strengthened by, rather than weakened by, training in the discipline.

AB - We applied a mixed-method research design to investigate the patterns of reasoning used by novice undergraduate chemistry students to classify chemical substances as elements, compounds, or mixtures based on their particulate representations. We were interested in the identification of the representational features that students use to build a classification system, and in the characterization of the thinking processes that they follow to group substances in different classes. Students in our study used structural and chemical composition features to classify chemical substances into elements, compounds, and mixtures. Many of the students' classification errors resulted from strong mental associations between concepts (e.g., atom-element, molecule-compound) or from lack of conceptual differentiation (e.g., compound-mixture). Strong concept associations led novice students to reduce the number of relevant features used to differentiate between substances, while the inability to discriminate between two concepts (conceptual undifferentiation) led them to pay too much attention to irrelevant features during the classification tasks. Comparisons of the responses to classification tasks of students with different levels of expertise in chemistry indicate that some of these naïve patterns of reasoning may be strengthened by, rather than weakened by, training in the discipline.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34047154561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34047154561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09500690600931129

DO - 10.1080/09500690600931129

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34047154561

VL - 29

SP - 643

EP - 661

JO - International Journal of Science Education

JF - International Journal of Science Education

SN - 0950-0693

IS - 5

ER -