Clinical Efficacy of the Pan Metatarsal Head Resection as a Curative Procedure in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Neuropathic Forefoot Wounds

David G Armstrong, Joseph L. Fiorito, Brian J. Leykum, Joseph L Mills

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the pan metatarsal head resection (PMHR) compared with nonsurgical management of wounds in the forefoot in people with diabetes. Methods. The authors evaluated 92 patients with diabetes (66.3% male), with ulcers classified as University of Texas grade 1A or 2A at the plantar aspect of the forefoot using a case-control model. Cases were patients treated with multiple metatarsal head resections for multiple metatarsal head wounds, and controls received standard nonsurgical care. Both groups received standard off-loading and wound care. Outcomes included time to healing, reulceration, infection, and amputation. Results. Patients in the surgery group (SG) healed significantly faster than those in the standard therapy group (ST; 84.2 ± 39.9 days for the ST vs 60.1 ± 27.9 days for the SG; P = .003) and had fewer recurrent ulcers (39.1% for the ST vs 15.2% for the SG; P = .02; odds ratio [OR] = 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-9.7) and infections during 1 year of follow-up (64.5% for the ST vs 35.5% for the SG; P = .047; OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.0-6.0). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients receiving an incident amputation in the follow-up period (13.0% for the ST vs 6.5% for the SG; P = .5). Conclusion. The results of this study suggest that the PMHR may be associated with shorter times to healing and lower morbidity compared with standard care alone in patients without digital gangrene and with multiple plantar forefoot ulcers.Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)235-240
Number of pages6
JournalFoot & ankle specialist
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2012

Fingerprint

Metatarsal Bones
Diabetes Mellitus
Wounds and Injuries
Amputation
Ulcer
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Foot Ulcer
Gangrene
Group Psychotherapy
Infection
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Morbidity
Safety

Keywords

  • amputation and limb salvage
  • diabetes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Podiatry
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Clinical Efficacy of the Pan Metatarsal Head Resection as a Curative Procedure in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Neuropathic Forefoot Wounds. / Armstrong, David G; Fiorito, Joseph L.; Leykum, Brian J.; Mills, Joseph L.

In: Foot & ankle specialist, Vol. 5, No. 4, 08.2012, p. 235-240.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ce89189e4357413f9e9b66b30f5ea1fc,
title = "Clinical Efficacy of the Pan Metatarsal Head Resection as a Curative Procedure in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Neuropathic Forefoot Wounds",
abstract = "Objective. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the pan metatarsal head resection (PMHR) compared with nonsurgical management of wounds in the forefoot in people with diabetes. Methods. The authors evaluated 92 patients with diabetes (66.3{\%} male), with ulcers classified as University of Texas grade 1A or 2A at the plantar aspect of the forefoot using a case-control model. Cases were patients treated with multiple metatarsal head resections for multiple metatarsal head wounds, and controls received standard nonsurgical care. Both groups received standard off-loading and wound care. Outcomes included time to healing, reulceration, infection, and amputation. Results. Patients in the surgery group (SG) healed significantly faster than those in the standard therapy group (ST; 84.2 ± 39.9 days for the ST vs 60.1 ± 27.9 days for the SG; P = .003) and had fewer recurrent ulcers (39.1{\%} for the ST vs 15.2{\%} for the SG; P = .02; odds ratio [OR] = 3.6; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-9.7) and infections during 1 year of follow-up (64.5{\%} for the ST vs 35.5{\%} for the SG; P = .047; OR = 2.4; 95{\%} CI = 1.0-6.0). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients receiving an incident amputation in the follow-up period (13.0{\%} for the ST vs 6.5{\%} for the SG; P = .5). Conclusion. The results of this study suggest that the PMHR may be associated with shorter times to healing and lower morbidity compared with standard care alone in patients without digital gangrene and with multiple plantar forefoot ulcers.Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III",
keywords = "amputation and limb salvage, diabetes",
author = "Armstrong, {David G} and Fiorito, {Joseph L.} and Leykum, {Brian J.} and Mills, {Joseph L}",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1177/1938640012449038",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "235--240",
journal = "Foot and Ankle Specialist",
issn = "1938-6400",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical Efficacy of the Pan Metatarsal Head Resection as a Curative Procedure in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Neuropathic Forefoot Wounds

AU - Armstrong, David G

AU - Fiorito, Joseph L.

AU - Leykum, Brian J.

AU - Mills, Joseph L

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Objective. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the pan metatarsal head resection (PMHR) compared with nonsurgical management of wounds in the forefoot in people with diabetes. Methods. The authors evaluated 92 patients with diabetes (66.3% male), with ulcers classified as University of Texas grade 1A or 2A at the plantar aspect of the forefoot using a case-control model. Cases were patients treated with multiple metatarsal head resections for multiple metatarsal head wounds, and controls received standard nonsurgical care. Both groups received standard off-loading and wound care. Outcomes included time to healing, reulceration, infection, and amputation. Results. Patients in the surgery group (SG) healed significantly faster than those in the standard therapy group (ST; 84.2 ± 39.9 days for the ST vs 60.1 ± 27.9 days for the SG; P = .003) and had fewer recurrent ulcers (39.1% for the ST vs 15.2% for the SG; P = .02; odds ratio [OR] = 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-9.7) and infections during 1 year of follow-up (64.5% for the ST vs 35.5% for the SG; P = .047; OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.0-6.0). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients receiving an incident amputation in the follow-up period (13.0% for the ST vs 6.5% for the SG; P = .5). Conclusion. The results of this study suggest that the PMHR may be associated with shorter times to healing and lower morbidity compared with standard care alone in patients without digital gangrene and with multiple plantar forefoot ulcers.Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III

AB - Objective. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the pan metatarsal head resection (PMHR) compared with nonsurgical management of wounds in the forefoot in people with diabetes. Methods. The authors evaluated 92 patients with diabetes (66.3% male), with ulcers classified as University of Texas grade 1A or 2A at the plantar aspect of the forefoot using a case-control model. Cases were patients treated with multiple metatarsal head resections for multiple metatarsal head wounds, and controls received standard nonsurgical care. Both groups received standard off-loading and wound care. Outcomes included time to healing, reulceration, infection, and amputation. Results. Patients in the surgery group (SG) healed significantly faster than those in the standard therapy group (ST; 84.2 ± 39.9 days for the ST vs 60.1 ± 27.9 days for the SG; P = .003) and had fewer recurrent ulcers (39.1% for the ST vs 15.2% for the SG; P = .02; odds ratio [OR] = 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-9.7) and infections during 1 year of follow-up (64.5% for the ST vs 35.5% for the SG; P = .047; OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.0-6.0). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients receiving an incident amputation in the follow-up period (13.0% for the ST vs 6.5% for the SG; P = .5). Conclusion. The results of this study suggest that the PMHR may be associated with shorter times to healing and lower morbidity compared with standard care alone in patients without digital gangrene and with multiple plantar forefoot ulcers.Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III

KW - amputation and limb salvage

KW - diabetes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864486917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864486917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1938640012449038

DO - 10.1177/1938640012449038

M3 - Article

C2 - 22715496

AN - SCOPUS:84864486917

VL - 5

SP - 235

EP - 240

JO - Foot and Ankle Specialist

JF - Foot and Ankle Specialist

SN - 1938-6400

IS - 4

ER -