Clinical prediction of cervical spine injuries in children. Radiographic abnormalities

I. Rachesky, W. T. Boyce, Burris R Duncan, J. Bjelland, B. Sibley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During the seven-year period from 1976 through 1982, 2133 cervical spine radiographs were obtained for children less than 18 years of age at two hospitals in Tucson. Twenty-five children (1.2%) had x-ray evidence of a cervical spine injury, with a male to female ratio of 4:1. Vehicular accidents accounted for 36% of cervical spine radiographic abnormalities, and sports or playground accidents accounted for an additional 36%. In an attempt to find clinical predictors that might identify x-ray abnormalities, we reviewed the medical records of these 25 children with abnormalities and 713 randomly selected children without x-ray evidence of cervical spine injuries for the following: (1) method of injury, (2) presenting complaints, (3) physical examination findings, (4) therapy, and (5) complications. No single clinical predictor had a sensitivity of 100% when considered in isolation, but clinical assessment consisting of EITHER a complaint of neck pain OR involvement in a vehicular accident with head trauma would have correctly identified all 25 cases of cervical spine injury. If this information had been used prospectively, the number of cervical spine raddiographs ordered would have been reduced by 32%. We conclude that the use of this clinical 'marker' would have positively identified all children with cervical spine injuries and would have reduced by one third the cost and radiation exposure associated with cervical spine radiographs. Because of the serious consequences of missing a cervical spine injury, we suggest that other studies confirm these results before this information is accepted as a recommendation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-201
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Diseases of Children
Volume141
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1987

Fingerprint

Spine
Wounds and Injuries
Accidents
X-Rays
Neck Pain
Craniocerebral Trauma
Physical Examination
Sports
Medical Records
Biomarkers
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Clinical prediction of cervical spine injuries in children. Radiographic abnormalities. / Rachesky, I.; Boyce, W. T.; Duncan, Burris R; Bjelland, J.; Sibley, B.

In: American Journal of Diseases of Children, Vol. 141, No. 2, 1987, p. 199-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rachesky, I. ; Boyce, W. T. ; Duncan, Burris R ; Bjelland, J. ; Sibley, B. / Clinical prediction of cervical spine injuries in children. Radiographic abnormalities. In: American Journal of Diseases of Children. 1987 ; Vol. 141, No. 2. pp. 199-201.
@article{24f0bed6ec174d17873b7951456189d2,
title = "Clinical prediction of cervical spine injuries in children. Radiographic abnormalities",
abstract = "During the seven-year period from 1976 through 1982, 2133 cervical spine radiographs were obtained for children less than 18 years of age at two hospitals in Tucson. Twenty-five children (1.2{\%}) had x-ray evidence of a cervical spine injury, with a male to female ratio of 4:1. Vehicular accidents accounted for 36{\%} of cervical spine radiographic abnormalities, and sports or playground accidents accounted for an additional 36{\%}. In an attempt to find clinical predictors that might identify x-ray abnormalities, we reviewed the medical records of these 25 children with abnormalities and 713 randomly selected children without x-ray evidence of cervical spine injuries for the following: (1) method of injury, (2) presenting complaints, (3) physical examination findings, (4) therapy, and (5) complications. No single clinical predictor had a sensitivity of 100{\%} when considered in isolation, but clinical assessment consisting of EITHER a complaint of neck pain OR involvement in a vehicular accident with head trauma would have correctly identified all 25 cases of cervical spine injury. If this information had been used prospectively, the number of cervical spine raddiographs ordered would have been reduced by 32{\%}. We conclude that the use of this clinical 'marker' would have positively identified all children with cervical spine injuries and would have reduced by one third the cost and radiation exposure associated with cervical spine radiographs. Because of the serious consequences of missing a cervical spine injury, we suggest that other studies confirm these results before this information is accepted as a recommendation.",
author = "I. Rachesky and Boyce, {W. T.} and Duncan, {Burris R} and J. Bjelland and B. Sibley",
year = "1987",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "141",
pages = "199--201",
journal = "JAMA Pediatrics",
issn = "2168-6203",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical prediction of cervical spine injuries in children. Radiographic abnormalities

AU - Rachesky, I.

AU - Boyce, W. T.

AU - Duncan, Burris R

AU - Bjelland, J.

AU - Sibley, B.

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - During the seven-year period from 1976 through 1982, 2133 cervical spine radiographs were obtained for children less than 18 years of age at two hospitals in Tucson. Twenty-five children (1.2%) had x-ray evidence of a cervical spine injury, with a male to female ratio of 4:1. Vehicular accidents accounted for 36% of cervical spine radiographic abnormalities, and sports or playground accidents accounted for an additional 36%. In an attempt to find clinical predictors that might identify x-ray abnormalities, we reviewed the medical records of these 25 children with abnormalities and 713 randomly selected children without x-ray evidence of cervical spine injuries for the following: (1) method of injury, (2) presenting complaints, (3) physical examination findings, (4) therapy, and (5) complications. No single clinical predictor had a sensitivity of 100% when considered in isolation, but clinical assessment consisting of EITHER a complaint of neck pain OR involvement in a vehicular accident with head trauma would have correctly identified all 25 cases of cervical spine injury. If this information had been used prospectively, the number of cervical spine raddiographs ordered would have been reduced by 32%. We conclude that the use of this clinical 'marker' would have positively identified all children with cervical spine injuries and would have reduced by one third the cost and radiation exposure associated with cervical spine radiographs. Because of the serious consequences of missing a cervical spine injury, we suggest that other studies confirm these results before this information is accepted as a recommendation.

AB - During the seven-year period from 1976 through 1982, 2133 cervical spine radiographs were obtained for children less than 18 years of age at two hospitals in Tucson. Twenty-five children (1.2%) had x-ray evidence of a cervical spine injury, with a male to female ratio of 4:1. Vehicular accidents accounted for 36% of cervical spine radiographic abnormalities, and sports or playground accidents accounted for an additional 36%. In an attempt to find clinical predictors that might identify x-ray abnormalities, we reviewed the medical records of these 25 children with abnormalities and 713 randomly selected children without x-ray evidence of cervical spine injuries for the following: (1) method of injury, (2) presenting complaints, (3) physical examination findings, (4) therapy, and (5) complications. No single clinical predictor had a sensitivity of 100% when considered in isolation, but clinical assessment consisting of EITHER a complaint of neck pain OR involvement in a vehicular accident with head trauma would have correctly identified all 25 cases of cervical spine injury. If this information had been used prospectively, the number of cervical spine raddiographs ordered would have been reduced by 32%. We conclude that the use of this clinical 'marker' would have positively identified all children with cervical spine injuries and would have reduced by one third the cost and radiation exposure associated with cervical spine radiographs. Because of the serious consequences of missing a cervical spine injury, we suggest that other studies confirm these results before this information is accepted as a recommendation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023115850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023115850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3812387

AN - SCOPUS:0023115850

VL - 141

SP - 199

EP - 201

JO - JAMA Pediatrics

JF - JAMA Pediatrics

SN - 2168-6203

IS - 2

ER -