Clinical presentation and management of iatrogenic colon perforations

Tewodros M. Gedebou, Randy A. Wong, William - Adamas-Rappaport, Philip Jaffe, Daniel Kahsai, Glenn C. Hunter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because iatrogenic colonic perforation is uncommon, surgical management of this complication has been based on the civilian trauma experience. In this study, we determine the incidence, clinical presentation, and management of colonic perforations resulting from colonoscopy or barium enema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients with colorectal perforations due to barium enema or colonoscopy seen over a 5- year period were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients, 12 males and 9 females aged 66 ± 16 years, undergoing evaluation for polyps and bleeding (11), diverticulosis (4), diarrhea (2), or miscellaneous indications (4) sustained colonic perforation from colonoscopy (18; 0.20%) or barium enema (3; 0.10%). Abdominal pain, 66% (13), and fever, 24% (5), were the most frequent symptoms encountered and extraluminal air, 67% (14), the most common radiologic finding. The site of perforation was the rectosigmoid in 62% (13) of patients. Eighteen patients underwent surgery; 11 within 24 hours (group I) and 7 patients within 6.0 ± 4 days (group II). Fifty percent (9 of 18) had primary repair or resection with anastomosis without mortality. Of the 6 patients initially treated nonoperatively, 3 subsequently underwent surgery. Both deaths, one in group I and one in group II, occurred in patients who had colonic diversion for perforation following colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in the absence of significant contamination either primary repair or resection and anastomosis can be performed with acceptable morbidity for iatrogenic perforations of the colon.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)454-458
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume172
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1996

Fingerprint

Colon
Colonoscopy
Diverticulum
Polyps
Abdominal Pain
Medical Records
Diarrhea
Fever
Air
Hemorrhage
Morbidity
Mortality
Incidence
Wounds and Injuries
Barium Enema

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Clinical presentation and management of iatrogenic colon perforations. / Gedebou, Tewodros M.; Wong, Randy A.; Adamas-Rappaport, William -; Jaffe, Philip; Kahsai, Daniel; Hunter, Glenn C.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 172, No. 5, 11.1996, p. 454-458.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gedebou, Tewodros M. ; Wong, Randy A. ; Adamas-Rappaport, William - ; Jaffe, Philip ; Kahsai, Daniel ; Hunter, Glenn C. / Clinical presentation and management of iatrogenic colon perforations. In: American Journal of Surgery. 1996 ; Vol. 172, No. 5. pp. 454-458.
@article{8c10cfa67d9f44edaac08bc69742306f,
title = "Clinical presentation and management of iatrogenic colon perforations",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Because iatrogenic colonic perforation is uncommon, surgical management of this complication has been based on the civilian trauma experience. In this study, we determine the incidence, clinical presentation, and management of colonic perforations resulting from colonoscopy or barium enema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients with colorectal perforations due to barium enema or colonoscopy seen over a 5- year period were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients, 12 males and 9 females aged 66 ± 16 years, undergoing evaluation for polyps and bleeding (11), diverticulosis (4), diarrhea (2), or miscellaneous indications (4) sustained colonic perforation from colonoscopy (18; 0.20{\%}) or barium enema (3; 0.10{\%}). Abdominal pain, 66{\%} (13), and fever, 24{\%} (5), were the most frequent symptoms encountered and extraluminal air, 67{\%} (14), the most common radiologic finding. The site of perforation was the rectosigmoid in 62{\%} (13) of patients. Eighteen patients underwent surgery; 11 within 24 hours (group I) and 7 patients within 6.0 ± 4 days (group II). Fifty percent (9 of 18) had primary repair or resection with anastomosis without mortality. Of the 6 patients initially treated nonoperatively, 3 subsequently underwent surgery. Both deaths, one in group I and one in group II, occurred in patients who had colonic diversion for perforation following colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in the absence of significant contamination either primary repair or resection and anastomosis can be performed with acceptable morbidity for iatrogenic perforations of the colon.",
author = "Gedebou, {Tewodros M.} and Wong, {Randy A.} and Adamas-Rappaport, {William -} and Philip Jaffe and Daniel Kahsai and Hunter, {Glenn C.}",
year = "1996",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00236-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "172",
pages = "454--458",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical presentation and management of iatrogenic colon perforations

AU - Gedebou, Tewodros M.

AU - Wong, Randy A.

AU - Adamas-Rappaport, William -

AU - Jaffe, Philip

AU - Kahsai, Daniel

AU - Hunter, Glenn C.

PY - 1996/11

Y1 - 1996/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: Because iatrogenic colonic perforation is uncommon, surgical management of this complication has been based on the civilian trauma experience. In this study, we determine the incidence, clinical presentation, and management of colonic perforations resulting from colonoscopy or barium enema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients with colorectal perforations due to barium enema or colonoscopy seen over a 5- year period were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients, 12 males and 9 females aged 66 ± 16 years, undergoing evaluation for polyps and bleeding (11), diverticulosis (4), diarrhea (2), or miscellaneous indications (4) sustained colonic perforation from colonoscopy (18; 0.20%) or barium enema (3; 0.10%). Abdominal pain, 66% (13), and fever, 24% (5), were the most frequent symptoms encountered and extraluminal air, 67% (14), the most common radiologic finding. The site of perforation was the rectosigmoid in 62% (13) of patients. Eighteen patients underwent surgery; 11 within 24 hours (group I) and 7 patients within 6.0 ± 4 days (group II). Fifty percent (9 of 18) had primary repair or resection with anastomosis without mortality. Of the 6 patients initially treated nonoperatively, 3 subsequently underwent surgery. Both deaths, one in group I and one in group II, occurred in patients who had colonic diversion for perforation following colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in the absence of significant contamination either primary repair or resection and anastomosis can be performed with acceptable morbidity for iatrogenic perforations of the colon.

AB - BACKGROUND: Because iatrogenic colonic perforation is uncommon, surgical management of this complication has been based on the civilian trauma experience. In this study, we determine the incidence, clinical presentation, and management of colonic perforations resulting from colonoscopy or barium enema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients with colorectal perforations due to barium enema or colonoscopy seen over a 5- year period were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients, 12 males and 9 females aged 66 ± 16 years, undergoing evaluation for polyps and bleeding (11), diverticulosis (4), diarrhea (2), or miscellaneous indications (4) sustained colonic perforation from colonoscopy (18; 0.20%) or barium enema (3; 0.10%). Abdominal pain, 66% (13), and fever, 24% (5), were the most frequent symptoms encountered and extraluminal air, 67% (14), the most common radiologic finding. The site of perforation was the rectosigmoid in 62% (13) of patients. Eighteen patients underwent surgery; 11 within 24 hours (group I) and 7 patients within 6.0 ± 4 days (group II). Fifty percent (9 of 18) had primary repair or resection with anastomosis without mortality. Of the 6 patients initially treated nonoperatively, 3 subsequently underwent surgery. Both deaths, one in group I and one in group II, occurred in patients who had colonic diversion for perforation following colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in the absence of significant contamination either primary repair or resection and anastomosis can be performed with acceptable morbidity for iatrogenic perforations of the colon.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030298023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030298023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00236-X

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00236-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 8942543

AN - SCOPUS:0030298023

VL - 172

SP - 454

EP - 458

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 5

ER -