Cloud-resolving model intercomparison of an MC3E squall line case: Part I—Convective updrafts

Jiwen Fan, Bin Han, Adam Varble, Hugh Morrison, Kirk North, Pavlos Kollias, Baojun Chen, Xiquan Dong, Scott E. Giangrande, Alexander Khain, Yun Lin, Edward Mansell, Jason A. Milbrandt, Ronald Stenz, Gregory Thompson, Yuan Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An intercomparison study of a midlatitude mesoscale squall line is performed using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model at 1 km horizontal grid spacing with eight different cloud microphysics schemes to investigate processes that contribute to the large variability in simulated cloud and precipitation properties. All simulations tend to produce a wider area of high radar reflectivity (Ze > 45 dBZ) than observed but a much narrower stratiform area. The magnitude of the virtual potential temperature drop associated with the gust front passage is similar in simulations and observations, while the pressure rise and peak wind speed are smaller than observed, possibly suggesting that simulated cold pools are shallower than observed. Most of the microphysics schemes overestimate vertical velocity and Ze in convective updrafts as compared with observational retrievals. Simulated precipitation rates and updraft velocities have significant variability across the eight schemes, even in this strongly dynamically driven system. Differences in simulated updraft velocity correlate well with differences in simulated buoyancy and low-level vertical perturbation pressure gradient, which appears related to cold pool intensity that is controlled by the evaporation rate. Simulations with stronger updrafts have a more optimal convective state, with stronger cold pools, ambient low-level vertical wind shear, and rear-inflow jets. Updraft velocity variability between schemes is mainly controlled by differences in simulated ice-related processes, which impact the overall latent heating rate, whereas surface rainfall variability increases in no-ice simulations mainly because of scheme differences in collision-coalescence parameterizations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9351-9378
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Volume122
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 16 2017

Fingerprint

vertical air currents
squall line
updraft
cold pool
Ice
ice
simulation
evaporation rate
radar
Precipitation (meteorology)
gusts
wind shear
Parameterization
cloud microphysics
Buoyancy
Pressure gradient
Heating rate
Coalescence
gust
wind speed

Keywords

  • convection
  • microphysics parameterization
  • model intercomparison
  • squall line

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics
  • Forestry
  • Oceanography
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Soil Science
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Palaeontology

Cite this

Cloud-resolving model intercomparison of an MC3E squall line case : Part I—Convective updrafts. / Fan, Jiwen; Han, Bin; Varble, Adam; Morrison, Hugh; North, Kirk; Kollias, Pavlos; Chen, Baojun; Dong, Xiquan; Giangrande, Scott E.; Khain, Alexander; Lin, Yun; Mansell, Edward; Milbrandt, Jason A.; Stenz, Ronald; Thompson, Gregory; Wang, Yuan.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 122, No. 17, 16.09.2017, p. 9351-9378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fan, J, Han, B, Varble, A, Morrison, H, North, K, Kollias, P, Chen, B, Dong, X, Giangrande, SE, Khain, A, Lin, Y, Mansell, E, Milbrandt, JA, Stenz, R, Thompson, G & Wang, Y 2017, 'Cloud-resolving model intercomparison of an MC3E squall line case: Part I—Convective updrafts', Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 122, no. 17, pp. 9351-9378. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026622
Fan, Jiwen ; Han, Bin ; Varble, Adam ; Morrison, Hugh ; North, Kirk ; Kollias, Pavlos ; Chen, Baojun ; Dong, Xiquan ; Giangrande, Scott E. ; Khain, Alexander ; Lin, Yun ; Mansell, Edward ; Milbrandt, Jason A. ; Stenz, Ronald ; Thompson, Gregory ; Wang, Yuan. / Cloud-resolving model intercomparison of an MC3E squall line case : Part I—Convective updrafts. In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2017 ; Vol. 122, No. 17. pp. 9351-9378.
@article{50058b5bfc9c4fa4af172f5316450aa0,
title = "Cloud-resolving model intercomparison of an MC3E squall line case: Part I—Convective updrafts",
abstract = "An intercomparison study of a midlatitude mesoscale squall line is performed using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model at 1 km horizontal grid spacing with eight different cloud microphysics schemes to investigate processes that contribute to the large variability in simulated cloud and precipitation properties. All simulations tend to produce a wider area of high radar reflectivity (Ze > 45 dBZ) than observed but a much narrower stratiform area. The magnitude of the virtual potential temperature drop associated with the gust front passage is similar in simulations and observations, while the pressure rise and peak wind speed are smaller than observed, possibly suggesting that simulated cold pools are shallower than observed. Most of the microphysics schemes overestimate vertical velocity and Ze in convective updrafts as compared with observational retrievals. Simulated precipitation rates and updraft velocities have significant variability across the eight schemes, even in this strongly dynamically driven system. Differences in simulated updraft velocity correlate well with differences in simulated buoyancy and low-level vertical perturbation pressure gradient, which appears related to cold pool intensity that is controlled by the evaporation rate. Simulations with stronger updrafts have a more optimal convective state, with stronger cold pools, ambient low-level vertical wind shear, and rear-inflow jets. Updraft velocity variability between schemes is mainly controlled by differences in simulated ice-related processes, which impact the overall latent heating rate, whereas surface rainfall variability increases in no-ice simulations mainly because of scheme differences in collision-coalescence parameterizations.",
keywords = "convection, microphysics parameterization, model intercomparison, squall line",
author = "Jiwen Fan and Bin Han and Adam Varble and Hugh Morrison and Kirk North and Pavlos Kollias and Baojun Chen and Xiquan Dong and Giangrande, {Scott E.} and Alexander Khain and Yun Lin and Edward Mansell and Milbrandt, {Jason A.} and Ronald Stenz and Gregory Thompson and Yuan Wang",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1002/2017JD026622",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "9351--9378",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres",
issn = "2169-897X",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cloud-resolving model intercomparison of an MC3E squall line case

T2 - Part I—Convective updrafts

AU - Fan, Jiwen

AU - Han, Bin

AU - Varble, Adam

AU - Morrison, Hugh

AU - North, Kirk

AU - Kollias, Pavlos

AU - Chen, Baojun

AU - Dong, Xiquan

AU - Giangrande, Scott E.

AU - Khain, Alexander

AU - Lin, Yun

AU - Mansell, Edward

AU - Milbrandt, Jason A.

AU - Stenz, Ronald

AU - Thompson, Gregory

AU - Wang, Yuan

PY - 2017/9/16

Y1 - 2017/9/16

N2 - An intercomparison study of a midlatitude mesoscale squall line is performed using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model at 1 km horizontal grid spacing with eight different cloud microphysics schemes to investigate processes that contribute to the large variability in simulated cloud and precipitation properties. All simulations tend to produce a wider area of high radar reflectivity (Ze > 45 dBZ) than observed but a much narrower stratiform area. The magnitude of the virtual potential temperature drop associated with the gust front passage is similar in simulations and observations, while the pressure rise and peak wind speed are smaller than observed, possibly suggesting that simulated cold pools are shallower than observed. Most of the microphysics schemes overestimate vertical velocity and Ze in convective updrafts as compared with observational retrievals. Simulated precipitation rates and updraft velocities have significant variability across the eight schemes, even in this strongly dynamically driven system. Differences in simulated updraft velocity correlate well with differences in simulated buoyancy and low-level vertical perturbation pressure gradient, which appears related to cold pool intensity that is controlled by the evaporation rate. Simulations with stronger updrafts have a more optimal convective state, with stronger cold pools, ambient low-level vertical wind shear, and rear-inflow jets. Updraft velocity variability between schemes is mainly controlled by differences in simulated ice-related processes, which impact the overall latent heating rate, whereas surface rainfall variability increases in no-ice simulations mainly because of scheme differences in collision-coalescence parameterizations.

AB - An intercomparison study of a midlatitude mesoscale squall line is performed using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model at 1 km horizontal grid spacing with eight different cloud microphysics schemes to investigate processes that contribute to the large variability in simulated cloud and precipitation properties. All simulations tend to produce a wider area of high radar reflectivity (Ze > 45 dBZ) than observed but a much narrower stratiform area. The magnitude of the virtual potential temperature drop associated with the gust front passage is similar in simulations and observations, while the pressure rise and peak wind speed are smaller than observed, possibly suggesting that simulated cold pools are shallower than observed. Most of the microphysics schemes overestimate vertical velocity and Ze in convective updrafts as compared with observational retrievals. Simulated precipitation rates and updraft velocities have significant variability across the eight schemes, even in this strongly dynamically driven system. Differences in simulated updraft velocity correlate well with differences in simulated buoyancy and low-level vertical perturbation pressure gradient, which appears related to cold pool intensity that is controlled by the evaporation rate. Simulations with stronger updrafts have a more optimal convective state, with stronger cold pools, ambient low-level vertical wind shear, and rear-inflow jets. Updraft velocity variability between schemes is mainly controlled by differences in simulated ice-related processes, which impact the overall latent heating rate, whereas surface rainfall variability increases in no-ice simulations mainly because of scheme differences in collision-coalescence parameterizations.

KW - convection

KW - microphysics parameterization

KW - model intercomparison

KW - squall line

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030116117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030116117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/2017JD026622

DO - 10.1002/2017JD026622

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85030116117

VL - 122

SP - 9351

EP - 9378

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

SN - 2169-897X

IS - 17

ER -