Cloud-Resolving Model Intercomparison of an MC3E Squall Line Case: Part II. Stratiform Precipitation Properties

Bin Han, Jiwen Fan, Adam Varble, Hugh Morrison, Christopher R. Williams, Baojun Chen, Xiquan Dong, Scott E. Giangrande, Alexander Khain, Edward Mansell, Jason A. Milbrandt, Jacob Shpund, Gregory Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this second part of a cloud microphysics scheme intercomparison study, we focus on biases and variabilities of stratiform precipitation properties for a midlatitude squall line event simulated with a cloud-resolving model implemented with eight cloud microphysics schemes. Most of the microphysics schemes underestimate total stratiform precipitation, mainly due to underestimation of stratiform precipitation area. All schemes underestimate the frequency of moderate stratiform rain rates (2–6 mm/hr), which may result from low-biased ice number and mass concentrations for 0.2–2-mm diameter particles in the stratiform ice region. Most simulations overestimate ice water content (IWC) at altitudes above 7 km for temperatures colder than −20 °C but produce a decrease of IWC approaching the melting level, which is opposite to the trend shown by in situ observations. This leads to general underestimations of stratiform IWC below 5-km altitude and rainwater content above 1-km altitude for a given rain rate. Stratiform precipitation area positively correlates with the convective condensate detrainment flux but is modulated by hydrometeor type, size, and fall speed. Stratiform precipitation area also changes by up to 17%–25% through alterations of the lateral boundary condition forcing frequency. Stratiform precipitation, rain rate, and area across the simulations vary by a factor of 1.5. This large variability is primarily a result of variability in the stratiform downward ice mass flux, which is highly correlated with convective condensate horizontal detrainment strength. The variability of simulated local microphysical processes in the stratiform region plays a secondary role in explaining variability in simulated stratiform rainfall properties.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1090-1117
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Volume124
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 27 2019

Fingerprint

squall line
Ice
ice
Rain
rain
Water content
moisture content
cloud microphysics
Precipitation (meteorology)
water content
condensate
condensates
hydrometeors
temperate regions
rainfall simulation
melting
rainwater
simulation
Melting
boundary condition

Keywords

  • microphysics parameterization
  • model intercomparison
  • squall line
  • stratiform precipitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics
  • Forestry
  • Oceanography
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Soil Science
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Palaeontology

Cite this

Cloud-Resolving Model Intercomparison of an MC3E Squall Line Case : Part II. Stratiform Precipitation Properties. / Han, Bin; Fan, Jiwen; Varble, Adam; Morrison, Hugh; Williams, Christopher R.; Chen, Baojun; Dong, Xiquan; Giangrande, Scott E.; Khain, Alexander; Mansell, Edward; Milbrandt, Jason A.; Shpund, Jacob; Thompson, Gregory.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 124, No. 2, 27.01.2019, p. 1090-1117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Han, B, Fan, J, Varble, A, Morrison, H, Williams, CR, Chen, B, Dong, X, Giangrande, SE, Khain, A, Mansell, E, Milbrandt, JA, Shpund, J & Thompson, G 2019, 'Cloud-Resolving Model Intercomparison of an MC3E Squall Line Case: Part II. Stratiform Precipitation Properties', Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 1090-1117. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029596
Han, Bin ; Fan, Jiwen ; Varble, Adam ; Morrison, Hugh ; Williams, Christopher R. ; Chen, Baojun ; Dong, Xiquan ; Giangrande, Scott E. ; Khain, Alexander ; Mansell, Edward ; Milbrandt, Jason A. ; Shpund, Jacob ; Thompson, Gregory. / Cloud-Resolving Model Intercomparison of an MC3E Squall Line Case : Part II. Stratiform Precipitation Properties. In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2019 ; Vol. 124, No. 2. pp. 1090-1117.
@article{c59ce8067ca9469ea59b6dc8232a7d91,
title = "Cloud-Resolving Model Intercomparison of an MC3E Squall Line Case: Part II. Stratiform Precipitation Properties",
abstract = "In this second part of a cloud microphysics scheme intercomparison study, we focus on biases and variabilities of stratiform precipitation properties for a midlatitude squall line event simulated with a cloud-resolving model implemented with eight cloud microphysics schemes. Most of the microphysics schemes underestimate total stratiform precipitation, mainly due to underestimation of stratiform precipitation area. All schemes underestimate the frequency of moderate stratiform rain rates (2–6 mm/hr), which may result from low-biased ice number and mass concentrations for 0.2–2-mm diameter particles in the stratiform ice region. Most simulations overestimate ice water content (IWC) at altitudes above 7 km for temperatures colder than −20 °C but produce a decrease of IWC approaching the melting level, which is opposite to the trend shown by in situ observations. This leads to general underestimations of stratiform IWC below 5-km altitude and rainwater content above 1-km altitude for a given rain rate. Stratiform precipitation area positively correlates with the convective condensate detrainment flux but is modulated by hydrometeor type, size, and fall speed. Stratiform precipitation area also changes by up to 17{\%}–25{\%} through alterations of the lateral boundary condition forcing frequency. Stratiform precipitation, rain rate, and area across the simulations vary by a factor of 1.5. This large variability is primarily a result of variability in the stratiform downward ice mass flux, which is highly correlated with convective condensate horizontal detrainment strength. The variability of simulated local microphysical processes in the stratiform region plays a secondary role in explaining variability in simulated stratiform rainfall properties.",
keywords = "microphysics parameterization, model intercomparison, squall line, stratiform precipitation",
author = "Bin Han and Jiwen Fan and Adam Varble and Hugh Morrison and Williams, {Christopher R.} and Baojun Chen and Xiquan Dong and Giangrande, {Scott E.} and Alexander Khain and Edward Mansell and Milbrandt, {Jason A.} and Jacob Shpund and Gregory Thompson",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1029/2018JD029596",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "124",
pages = "1090--1117",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres",
issn = "2169-897X",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cloud-Resolving Model Intercomparison of an MC3E Squall Line Case

T2 - Part II. Stratiform Precipitation Properties

AU - Han, Bin

AU - Fan, Jiwen

AU - Varble, Adam

AU - Morrison, Hugh

AU - Williams, Christopher R.

AU - Chen, Baojun

AU - Dong, Xiquan

AU - Giangrande, Scott E.

AU - Khain, Alexander

AU - Mansell, Edward

AU - Milbrandt, Jason A.

AU - Shpund, Jacob

AU - Thompson, Gregory

PY - 2019/1/27

Y1 - 2019/1/27

N2 - In this second part of a cloud microphysics scheme intercomparison study, we focus on biases and variabilities of stratiform precipitation properties for a midlatitude squall line event simulated with a cloud-resolving model implemented with eight cloud microphysics schemes. Most of the microphysics schemes underestimate total stratiform precipitation, mainly due to underestimation of stratiform precipitation area. All schemes underestimate the frequency of moderate stratiform rain rates (2–6 mm/hr), which may result from low-biased ice number and mass concentrations for 0.2–2-mm diameter particles in the stratiform ice region. Most simulations overestimate ice water content (IWC) at altitudes above 7 km for temperatures colder than −20 °C but produce a decrease of IWC approaching the melting level, which is opposite to the trend shown by in situ observations. This leads to general underestimations of stratiform IWC below 5-km altitude and rainwater content above 1-km altitude for a given rain rate. Stratiform precipitation area positively correlates with the convective condensate detrainment flux but is modulated by hydrometeor type, size, and fall speed. Stratiform precipitation area also changes by up to 17%–25% through alterations of the lateral boundary condition forcing frequency. Stratiform precipitation, rain rate, and area across the simulations vary by a factor of 1.5. This large variability is primarily a result of variability in the stratiform downward ice mass flux, which is highly correlated with convective condensate horizontal detrainment strength. The variability of simulated local microphysical processes in the stratiform region plays a secondary role in explaining variability in simulated stratiform rainfall properties.

AB - In this second part of a cloud microphysics scheme intercomparison study, we focus on biases and variabilities of stratiform precipitation properties for a midlatitude squall line event simulated with a cloud-resolving model implemented with eight cloud microphysics schemes. Most of the microphysics schemes underestimate total stratiform precipitation, mainly due to underestimation of stratiform precipitation area. All schemes underestimate the frequency of moderate stratiform rain rates (2–6 mm/hr), which may result from low-biased ice number and mass concentrations for 0.2–2-mm diameter particles in the stratiform ice region. Most simulations overestimate ice water content (IWC) at altitudes above 7 km for temperatures colder than −20 °C but produce a decrease of IWC approaching the melting level, which is opposite to the trend shown by in situ observations. This leads to general underestimations of stratiform IWC below 5-km altitude and rainwater content above 1-km altitude for a given rain rate. Stratiform precipitation area positively correlates with the convective condensate detrainment flux but is modulated by hydrometeor type, size, and fall speed. Stratiform precipitation area also changes by up to 17%–25% through alterations of the lateral boundary condition forcing frequency. Stratiform precipitation, rain rate, and area across the simulations vary by a factor of 1.5. This large variability is primarily a result of variability in the stratiform downward ice mass flux, which is highly correlated with convective condensate horizontal detrainment strength. The variability of simulated local microphysical processes in the stratiform region plays a secondary role in explaining variability in simulated stratiform rainfall properties.

KW - microphysics parameterization

KW - model intercomparison

KW - squall line

KW - stratiform precipitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060791960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060791960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2018JD029596

DO - 10.1029/2018JD029596

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85060791960

VL - 124

SP - 1090

EP - 1117

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

SN - 2169-897X

IS - 2

ER -