Co-management between hospitalist and hepatologist improves the quality of care of inpatients with chronic liver disease

Archita Desai, Rohit Satoskar, Anoop Appannagari, K. Gautham Reddy, Helen S. Te, Nancy Reau, David O. Meltzer, Donald Jensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND GOALS:: Our institution shifted the care of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) from Internal Medicine faculty, house staff, and consulting hepatology service to a co-managed unit staffed by academic hospitalists and hepatologists. The effect of co-management between hospitalists and hepatologists on the care of patients hospitalized with complications of CLD such as spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is unknown. STUDY:: A retrospective chart review of 56 adult patients admitted with CLD and SBP from July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2010 was performed. Adherence rates to current management guidelines were measured along with costs and outcomes of care. RESULTS:: Patients admitted under the 2 models of care were similar; however, they consistently underwent paracentesis within 24 hours (100% vs. 79%, P=0.013), had appropriate avoidance of fresh-frozen plasma use (75% vs. 43%, P=0.05), received albumin (97% vs. 65%, P=0.002), and were discharged on SBP prophylaxis (91% vs. 37%, P<0.001) under the co-managed model compared with the conventional model. Costs of care were similar between the 2 groups. We note a trend toward improved outcomes of care under the co-management model as measured by transfer rates to the intensive care unit, inpatient mortality, 30-day readmission, and mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS:: These results support co-management between hospitalists and hepatologists as a superior model of care for hospitalized patients with SBP. Furthermore, this study adds to the growing literature indicating that efforts are needed to improve the quality of care delivered to CLD patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hospitalists
Quality of Health Care
Peritonitis
Liver Diseases
Inpatients
Chronic Disease
Patient Care
Paracentesis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Mortality
Gastroenterology
Internship and Residency
Internal Medicine
Intensive Care Units
Albumins
Guidelines
Gastroenterologists

Keywords

  • chronic liver disease
  • co-management
  • quality of care
  • spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Co-management between hospitalist and hepatologist improves the quality of care of inpatients with chronic liver disease. / Desai, Archita; Satoskar, Rohit; Appannagari, Anoop; Reddy, K. Gautham; Te, Helen S.; Reau, Nancy; Meltzer, David O.; Jensen, Donald.

In: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Desai, Archita ; Satoskar, Rohit ; Appannagari, Anoop ; Reddy, K. Gautham ; Te, Helen S. ; Reau, Nancy ; Meltzer, David O. ; Jensen, Donald. / Co-management between hospitalist and hepatologist improves the quality of care of inpatients with chronic liver disease. In: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 2014 ; Vol. 48, No. 4.
@article{7448a0b289cc45618434315d11a9d20a,
title = "Co-management between hospitalist and hepatologist improves the quality of care of inpatients with chronic liver disease",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND GOALS:: Our institution shifted the care of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) from Internal Medicine faculty, house staff, and consulting hepatology service to a co-managed unit staffed by academic hospitalists and hepatologists. The effect of co-management between hospitalists and hepatologists on the care of patients hospitalized with complications of CLD such as spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is unknown. STUDY:: A retrospective chart review of 56 adult patients admitted with CLD and SBP from July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2010 was performed. Adherence rates to current management guidelines were measured along with costs and outcomes of care. RESULTS:: Patients admitted under the 2 models of care were similar; however, they consistently underwent paracentesis within 24 hours (100{\%} vs. 79{\%}, P=0.013), had appropriate avoidance of fresh-frozen plasma use (75{\%} vs. 43{\%}, P=0.05), received albumin (97{\%} vs. 65{\%}, P=0.002), and were discharged on SBP prophylaxis (91{\%} vs. 37{\%}, P<0.001) under the co-managed model compared with the conventional model. Costs of care were similar between the 2 groups. We note a trend toward improved outcomes of care under the co-management model as measured by transfer rates to the intensive care unit, inpatient mortality, 30-day readmission, and mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS:: These results support co-management between hospitalists and hepatologists as a superior model of care for hospitalized patients with SBP. Furthermore, this study adds to the growing literature indicating that efforts are needed to improve the quality of care delivered to CLD patients.",
keywords = "chronic liver disease, co-management, quality of care, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis",
author = "Archita Desai and Rohit Satoskar and Anoop Appannagari and Reddy, {K. Gautham} and Te, {Helen S.} and Nancy Reau and Meltzer, {David O.} and Donald Jensen",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182a87f70",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology",
issn = "0192-0790",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Co-management between hospitalist and hepatologist improves the quality of care of inpatients with chronic liver disease

AU - Desai, Archita

AU - Satoskar, Rohit

AU - Appannagari, Anoop

AU - Reddy, K. Gautham

AU - Te, Helen S.

AU - Reau, Nancy

AU - Meltzer, David O.

AU - Jensen, Donald

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - BACKGROUND AND GOALS:: Our institution shifted the care of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) from Internal Medicine faculty, house staff, and consulting hepatology service to a co-managed unit staffed by academic hospitalists and hepatologists. The effect of co-management between hospitalists and hepatologists on the care of patients hospitalized with complications of CLD such as spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is unknown. STUDY:: A retrospective chart review of 56 adult patients admitted with CLD and SBP from July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2010 was performed. Adherence rates to current management guidelines were measured along with costs and outcomes of care. RESULTS:: Patients admitted under the 2 models of care were similar; however, they consistently underwent paracentesis within 24 hours (100% vs. 79%, P=0.013), had appropriate avoidance of fresh-frozen plasma use (75% vs. 43%, P=0.05), received albumin (97% vs. 65%, P=0.002), and were discharged on SBP prophylaxis (91% vs. 37%, P<0.001) under the co-managed model compared with the conventional model. Costs of care were similar between the 2 groups. We note a trend toward improved outcomes of care under the co-management model as measured by transfer rates to the intensive care unit, inpatient mortality, 30-day readmission, and mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS:: These results support co-management between hospitalists and hepatologists as a superior model of care for hospitalized patients with SBP. Furthermore, this study adds to the growing literature indicating that efforts are needed to improve the quality of care delivered to CLD patients.

AB - BACKGROUND AND GOALS:: Our institution shifted the care of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) from Internal Medicine faculty, house staff, and consulting hepatology service to a co-managed unit staffed by academic hospitalists and hepatologists. The effect of co-management between hospitalists and hepatologists on the care of patients hospitalized with complications of CLD such as spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is unknown. STUDY:: A retrospective chart review of 56 adult patients admitted with CLD and SBP from July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2010 was performed. Adherence rates to current management guidelines were measured along with costs and outcomes of care. RESULTS:: Patients admitted under the 2 models of care were similar; however, they consistently underwent paracentesis within 24 hours (100% vs. 79%, P=0.013), had appropriate avoidance of fresh-frozen plasma use (75% vs. 43%, P=0.05), received albumin (97% vs. 65%, P=0.002), and were discharged on SBP prophylaxis (91% vs. 37%, P<0.001) under the co-managed model compared with the conventional model. Costs of care were similar between the 2 groups. We note a trend toward improved outcomes of care under the co-management model as measured by transfer rates to the intensive care unit, inpatient mortality, 30-day readmission, and mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS:: These results support co-management between hospitalists and hepatologists as a superior model of care for hospitalized patients with SBP. Furthermore, this study adds to the growing literature indicating that efforts are needed to improve the quality of care delivered to CLD patients.

KW - chronic liver disease

KW - co-management

KW - quality of care

KW - spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896314610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896314610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182a87f70

DO - 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182a87f70

M3 - Article

C2 - 24100752

AN - SCOPUS:84896314610

VL - 48

JO - Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

JF - Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

SN - 0192-0790

IS - 4

ER -