Cognitive assessment in Alzheimer's disease: Cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives

Alfred W Kaszniak, R. S. Wilson, J. H. Fox, G. T. Stebbins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper describes select results of a longitudinal study of 62 mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, in comparison to 60 age-matched healthy controls. Initial neurologic, radiologic, psychiatric, laboratory and cognitive examinations, required two full days, followed by one-day examinations at annual intervals. Of the total original sample, 31 AD patients and 39 controls could actually be followed for three annual examinations. Cognitive examination data confirmed cross-sectional (group discriminative) validity of memory and language measures, and showed the expected longitudinal deterioration in the AD sample, with controls maintaining consistent performance over the three years. However, those measures showing largest group differences at initial examination were not best for tracking patient deterioration over time. Implications of these results for the selection of cognitive assessment measures are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)420-423
Number of pages4
JournalCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences
Volume13
Issue number4 SUPPL.
StatePublished - 1986

Fingerprint

Alzheimer Disease
Patient Identification Systems
Nervous System
Psychiatry
Longitudinal Studies
Language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Cognitive assessment in Alzheimer's disease : Cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives. / Kaszniak, Alfred W; Wilson, R. S.; Fox, J. H.; Stebbins, G. T.

In: Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 4 SUPPL., 1986, p. 420-423.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b677b1469e04a26923f11ed8f2751cf,
title = "Cognitive assessment in Alzheimer's disease: Cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives",
abstract = "This paper describes select results of a longitudinal study of 62 mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, in comparison to 60 age-matched healthy controls. Initial neurologic, radiologic, psychiatric, laboratory and cognitive examinations, required two full days, followed by one-day examinations at annual intervals. Of the total original sample, 31 AD patients and 39 controls could actually be followed for three annual examinations. Cognitive examination data confirmed cross-sectional (group discriminative) validity of memory and language measures, and showed the expected longitudinal deterioration in the AD sample, with controls maintaining consistent performance over the three years. However, those measures showing largest group differences at initial examination were not best for tracking patient deterioration over time. Implications of these results for the selection of cognitive assessment measures are discussed.",
author = "Kaszniak, {Alfred W} and Wilson, {R. S.} and Fox, {J. H.} and Stebbins, {G. T.}",
year = "1986",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "420--423",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences",
issn = "0317-1671",
publisher = "Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences",
number = "4 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive assessment in Alzheimer's disease

T2 - Cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives

AU - Kaszniak, Alfred W

AU - Wilson, R. S.

AU - Fox, J. H.

AU - Stebbins, G. T.

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - This paper describes select results of a longitudinal study of 62 mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, in comparison to 60 age-matched healthy controls. Initial neurologic, radiologic, psychiatric, laboratory and cognitive examinations, required two full days, followed by one-day examinations at annual intervals. Of the total original sample, 31 AD patients and 39 controls could actually be followed for three annual examinations. Cognitive examination data confirmed cross-sectional (group discriminative) validity of memory and language measures, and showed the expected longitudinal deterioration in the AD sample, with controls maintaining consistent performance over the three years. However, those measures showing largest group differences at initial examination were not best for tracking patient deterioration over time. Implications of these results for the selection of cognitive assessment measures are discussed.

AB - This paper describes select results of a longitudinal study of 62 mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, in comparison to 60 age-matched healthy controls. Initial neurologic, radiologic, psychiatric, laboratory and cognitive examinations, required two full days, followed by one-day examinations at annual intervals. Of the total original sample, 31 AD patients and 39 controls could actually be followed for three annual examinations. Cognitive examination data confirmed cross-sectional (group discriminative) validity of memory and language measures, and showed the expected longitudinal deterioration in the AD sample, with controls maintaining consistent performance over the three years. However, those measures showing largest group differences at initial examination were not best for tracking patient deterioration over time. Implications of these results for the selection of cognitive assessment measures are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022970650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022970650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3491663

AN - SCOPUS:0022970650

VL - 13

SP - 420

EP - 423

JO - Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences

JF - Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences

SN - 0317-1671

IS - 4 SUPPL.

ER -