Cognitive neuroscience analyses of memory: A historical perspective

Michael R. Polster, Lynn Nadel, Daniel L. Schacter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As part of the general trend toward interdisciplinary research in recent years, a growing number of investigators have come to consider both cognitive and neuroscientific perspectives when theorizing about memory. Although such cognitive neuroscience analyses are a relatively recent development, the approach has precedents in earlier scientific thinking about memory. In this article we present a historical review of three major issues in memory research-consolidation processes, the nature of memory representations, and multiple memory systems. We discuss the nature of the relation between cognitive and neuroscientific approaches to each of these issues with respect to the distinction between collateral, complementary, and convergent relations (Schacter, 1986). Although some early investigators offered analyses that linked psychological and physiological perspectives, there is little historical evidence of systematic or sustained interdisciplinary research. However, more recent work, especially with respect to hypotheses about memory systems, suggests progress toward establishing programmatic interdisciplinary research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume3
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1991

Fingerprint

Research
Research Personnel
Cognitive Neuroscience
Psychology
Memory Consolidation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Cognitive neuroscience analyses of memory : A historical perspective. / Polster, Michael R.; Nadel, Lynn; Schacter, Daniel L.

In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1991.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8c9e453382314b5699d9e5ce9571285f,
title = "Cognitive neuroscience analyses of memory: A historical perspective",
abstract = "As part of the general trend toward interdisciplinary research in recent years, a growing number of investigators have come to consider both cognitive and neuroscientific perspectives when theorizing about memory. Although such cognitive neuroscience analyses are a relatively recent development, the approach has precedents in earlier scientific thinking about memory. In this article we present a historical review of three major issues in memory research-consolidation processes, the nature of memory representations, and multiple memory systems. We discuss the nature of the relation between cognitive and neuroscientific approaches to each of these issues with respect to the distinction between collateral, complementary, and convergent relations (Schacter, 1986). Although some early investigators offered analyses that linked psychological and physiological perspectives, there is little historical evidence of systematic or sustained interdisciplinary research. However, more recent work, especially with respect to hypotheses about memory systems, suggests progress toward establishing programmatic interdisciplinary research.",
author = "Polster, {Michael R.} and Lynn Nadel and Schacter, {Daniel L.}",
year = "1991",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience",
issn = "0898-929X",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive neuroscience analyses of memory

T2 - A historical perspective

AU - Polster, Michael R.

AU - Nadel, Lynn

AU - Schacter, Daniel L.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - As part of the general trend toward interdisciplinary research in recent years, a growing number of investigators have come to consider both cognitive and neuroscientific perspectives when theorizing about memory. Although such cognitive neuroscience analyses are a relatively recent development, the approach has precedents in earlier scientific thinking about memory. In this article we present a historical review of three major issues in memory research-consolidation processes, the nature of memory representations, and multiple memory systems. We discuss the nature of the relation between cognitive and neuroscientific approaches to each of these issues with respect to the distinction between collateral, complementary, and convergent relations (Schacter, 1986). Although some early investigators offered analyses that linked psychological and physiological perspectives, there is little historical evidence of systematic or sustained interdisciplinary research. However, more recent work, especially with respect to hypotheses about memory systems, suggests progress toward establishing programmatic interdisciplinary research.

AB - As part of the general trend toward interdisciplinary research in recent years, a growing number of investigators have come to consider both cognitive and neuroscientific perspectives when theorizing about memory. Although such cognitive neuroscience analyses are a relatively recent development, the approach has precedents in earlier scientific thinking about memory. In this article we present a historical review of three major issues in memory research-consolidation processes, the nature of memory representations, and multiple memory systems. We discuss the nature of the relation between cognitive and neuroscientific approaches to each of these issues with respect to the distinction between collateral, complementary, and convergent relations (Schacter, 1986). Although some early investigators offered analyses that linked psychological and physiological perspectives, there is little historical evidence of systematic or sustained interdisciplinary research. However, more recent work, especially with respect to hypotheses about memory systems, suggests progress toward establishing programmatic interdisciplinary research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025945713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025945713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0025945713

VL - 3

JO - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

SN - 0898-929X

IS - 2

ER -