Collective action in a polycentric water governance system

Elizabeth Baldwin, Paul McCord, Jampel Dell'Angelo, Tom Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Small-scale irrigation systems are important for agricultural productivity in dryland agroecosystems, particularly in areas where there is significant intra- and interannual changes in rainfall patterns. Institutional analysis of common-pool resources has demonstrated the principles that tend to result in sustained water governance systems. However, previous work did not fully articulate the nested nature of institutions and how polycentric arrangements can play a role in both the formation and the ongoing maintenance of these governance systems. To better understand collective action across water user groups and decision-makers at multiple governance levels, we undertake a multilevel analysis of Kenya's polycentric approach to water governance, in place since reforms were initiated in 2002. Survey and interview data indicate that in the postreform period, water users in Kenya's Upper Ewaso Ng'iro basin engaged in behaviors associated with collective action, including reduced water use by upstream users to address downstream users' needs. We examine the factors that promote collective action in the region, asking whether features associated with polycentric governance have helped to promote collective action. We find that the presence of multiple decision centers with overlapping authority over water governance functions creates necessary—but not sufficient—conditions for collective action to occur. Regulations and formal conflict resolution mechanisms provide incentives for water users to cooperate, while shared membership in regional Water Resource Users Associations facilitates informal opportunities for users to share information and build trust over time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)212-222
Number of pages11
JournalEnvironmental Policy and Governance
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

collective action
collective behavior
governance
water
Kenya
agricultural ecosystem
irrigation system
water use
incentive
multi-level analysis
conflict resolution
water resource
irrigation
resources
decision maker
productivity
rainfall
resource
regulation
basin

Keywords

  • collective action
  • governance
  • institutional analysis
  • irrigation
  • Kenya
  • polycentricity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Collective action in a polycentric water governance system. / Baldwin, Elizabeth; McCord, Paul; Dell'Angelo, Jampel; Evans, Tom.

In: Environmental Policy and Governance, Vol. 28, No. 4, 01.07.2018, p. 212-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baldwin, Elizabeth ; McCord, Paul ; Dell'Angelo, Jampel ; Evans, Tom. / Collective action in a polycentric water governance system. In: Environmental Policy and Governance. 2018 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 212-222.
@article{94162d2baae74c65b12887f9824e83c4,
title = "Collective action in a polycentric water governance system",
abstract = "Small-scale irrigation systems are important for agricultural productivity in dryland agroecosystems, particularly in areas where there is significant intra- and interannual changes in rainfall patterns. Institutional analysis of common-pool resources has demonstrated the principles that tend to result in sustained water governance systems. However, previous work did not fully articulate the nested nature of institutions and how polycentric arrangements can play a role in both the formation and the ongoing maintenance of these governance systems. To better understand collective action across water user groups and decision-makers at multiple governance levels, we undertake a multilevel analysis of Kenya's polycentric approach to water governance, in place since reforms were initiated in 2002. Survey and interview data indicate that in the postreform period, water users in Kenya's Upper Ewaso Ng'iro basin engaged in behaviors associated with collective action, including reduced water use by upstream users to address downstream users' needs. We examine the factors that promote collective action in the region, asking whether features associated with polycentric governance have helped to promote collective action. We find that the presence of multiple decision centers with overlapping authority over water governance functions creates necessary—but not sufficient—conditions for collective action to occur. Regulations and formal conflict resolution mechanisms provide incentives for water users to cooperate, while shared membership in regional Water Resource Users Associations facilitates informal opportunities for users to share information and build trust over time.",
keywords = "collective action, governance, institutional analysis, irrigation, Kenya, polycentricity",
author = "Elizabeth Baldwin and Paul McCord and Jampel Dell'Angelo and Tom Evans",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/eet.1810",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "212--222",
journal = "Environmental Policy and Governance",
issn = "1756-932X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collective action in a polycentric water governance system

AU - Baldwin, Elizabeth

AU - McCord, Paul

AU - Dell'Angelo, Jampel

AU - Evans, Tom

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Small-scale irrigation systems are important for agricultural productivity in dryland agroecosystems, particularly in areas where there is significant intra- and interannual changes in rainfall patterns. Institutional analysis of common-pool resources has demonstrated the principles that tend to result in sustained water governance systems. However, previous work did not fully articulate the nested nature of institutions and how polycentric arrangements can play a role in both the formation and the ongoing maintenance of these governance systems. To better understand collective action across water user groups and decision-makers at multiple governance levels, we undertake a multilevel analysis of Kenya's polycentric approach to water governance, in place since reforms were initiated in 2002. Survey and interview data indicate that in the postreform period, water users in Kenya's Upper Ewaso Ng'iro basin engaged in behaviors associated with collective action, including reduced water use by upstream users to address downstream users' needs. We examine the factors that promote collective action in the region, asking whether features associated with polycentric governance have helped to promote collective action. We find that the presence of multiple decision centers with overlapping authority over water governance functions creates necessary—but not sufficient—conditions for collective action to occur. Regulations and formal conflict resolution mechanisms provide incentives for water users to cooperate, while shared membership in regional Water Resource Users Associations facilitates informal opportunities for users to share information and build trust over time.

AB - Small-scale irrigation systems are important for agricultural productivity in dryland agroecosystems, particularly in areas where there is significant intra- and interannual changes in rainfall patterns. Institutional analysis of common-pool resources has demonstrated the principles that tend to result in sustained water governance systems. However, previous work did not fully articulate the nested nature of institutions and how polycentric arrangements can play a role in both the formation and the ongoing maintenance of these governance systems. To better understand collective action across water user groups and decision-makers at multiple governance levels, we undertake a multilevel analysis of Kenya's polycentric approach to water governance, in place since reforms were initiated in 2002. Survey and interview data indicate that in the postreform period, water users in Kenya's Upper Ewaso Ng'iro basin engaged in behaviors associated with collective action, including reduced water use by upstream users to address downstream users' needs. We examine the factors that promote collective action in the region, asking whether features associated with polycentric governance have helped to promote collective action. We find that the presence of multiple decision centers with overlapping authority over water governance functions creates necessary—but not sufficient—conditions for collective action to occur. Regulations and formal conflict resolution mechanisms provide incentives for water users to cooperate, while shared membership in regional Water Resource Users Associations facilitates informal opportunities for users to share information and build trust over time.

KW - collective action

KW - governance

KW - institutional analysis

KW - irrigation

KW - Kenya

KW - polycentricity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052499380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052499380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/eet.1810

DO - 10.1002/eet.1810

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85052499380

VL - 28

SP - 212

EP - 222

JO - Environmental Policy and Governance

JF - Environmental Policy and Governance

SN - 1756-932X

IS - 4

ER -