College chemistry students' mental models of acids and acid strength

Lakeisha McClary, Vicente A Talanquer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The central goal of this study was to characterize the mental models of acids and acid strength expressed by advanced college chemistry students when engaged in prediction, explanation, and justification tasks that asked them to rank chemical compounds based on their relative acid strength. For that purpose we completed a qualitative research study involving students enrolled in different types of organic chemistry course sections at our university. Our analysis led to the identification of four distinct mental models, some of which resembled scientific models of acids and acid strength. However, the distinct models are better characterized as synthetic models that combined assumptions from one or more scientific models with intuitive beliefs about factors that determine the properties of chemical substances. For many students in our sample, mental models served more as tools for heuristic decision-making based on intuitively appealing, but many times mistaken, concept associations rather than as cognitive tools to generate explanations. Although many research participants used a single general mental model to complete all of the interview tasks, the presence of specific problem features or changes in the nature of the task (e.g., prediction vs. explanation) prompted several students to change their mental model or to add a different mental representation. Our study indicates that properly diversifying and sequencing the types of academic tasks in which students are asked to participate could better foster meaningful learning as different types of cognitive resources may be activated by different students, and thus shared, analyzed, and discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)396-413
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Research in Science Teaching
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

chemistry
student
qualitative research
heuristics
decision making
university
interview
resources
learning

Keywords

  • chemistry
  • college education
  • explanations
  • mental models
  • reasoning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

College chemistry students' mental models of acids and acid strength. / McClary, Lakeisha; Talanquer, Vicente A.

In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 48, No. 4, 04.2011, p. 396-413.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c23d7ae3ea144a1c9ebc1c9f80045c86,
title = "College chemistry students' mental models of acids and acid strength",
abstract = "The central goal of this study was to characterize the mental models of acids and acid strength expressed by advanced college chemistry students when engaged in prediction, explanation, and justification tasks that asked them to rank chemical compounds based on their relative acid strength. For that purpose we completed a qualitative research study involving students enrolled in different types of organic chemistry course sections at our university. Our analysis led to the identification of four distinct mental models, some of which resembled scientific models of acids and acid strength. However, the distinct models are better characterized as synthetic models that combined assumptions from one or more scientific models with intuitive beliefs about factors that determine the properties of chemical substances. For many students in our sample, mental models served more as tools for heuristic decision-making based on intuitively appealing, but many times mistaken, concept associations rather than as cognitive tools to generate explanations. Although many research participants used a single general mental model to complete all of the interview tasks, the presence of specific problem features or changes in the nature of the task (e.g., prediction vs. explanation) prompted several students to change their mental model or to add a different mental representation. Our study indicates that properly diversifying and sequencing the types of academic tasks in which students are asked to participate could better foster meaningful learning as different types of cognitive resources may be activated by different students, and thus shared, analyzed, and discussed.",
keywords = "chemistry, college education, explanations, mental models, reasoning",
author = "Lakeisha McClary and Talanquer, {Vicente A}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1002/tea.20407",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "396--413",
journal = "Journal of Research in Science Teaching",
issn = "0022-4308",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - College chemistry students' mental models of acids and acid strength

AU - McClary, Lakeisha

AU - Talanquer, Vicente A

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - The central goal of this study was to characterize the mental models of acids and acid strength expressed by advanced college chemistry students when engaged in prediction, explanation, and justification tasks that asked them to rank chemical compounds based on their relative acid strength. For that purpose we completed a qualitative research study involving students enrolled in different types of organic chemistry course sections at our university. Our analysis led to the identification of four distinct mental models, some of which resembled scientific models of acids and acid strength. However, the distinct models are better characterized as synthetic models that combined assumptions from one or more scientific models with intuitive beliefs about factors that determine the properties of chemical substances. For many students in our sample, mental models served more as tools for heuristic decision-making based on intuitively appealing, but many times mistaken, concept associations rather than as cognitive tools to generate explanations. Although many research participants used a single general mental model to complete all of the interview tasks, the presence of specific problem features or changes in the nature of the task (e.g., prediction vs. explanation) prompted several students to change their mental model or to add a different mental representation. Our study indicates that properly diversifying and sequencing the types of academic tasks in which students are asked to participate could better foster meaningful learning as different types of cognitive resources may be activated by different students, and thus shared, analyzed, and discussed.

AB - The central goal of this study was to characterize the mental models of acids and acid strength expressed by advanced college chemistry students when engaged in prediction, explanation, and justification tasks that asked them to rank chemical compounds based on their relative acid strength. For that purpose we completed a qualitative research study involving students enrolled in different types of organic chemistry course sections at our university. Our analysis led to the identification of four distinct mental models, some of which resembled scientific models of acids and acid strength. However, the distinct models are better characterized as synthetic models that combined assumptions from one or more scientific models with intuitive beliefs about factors that determine the properties of chemical substances. For many students in our sample, mental models served more as tools for heuristic decision-making based on intuitively appealing, but many times mistaken, concept associations rather than as cognitive tools to generate explanations. Although many research participants used a single general mental model to complete all of the interview tasks, the presence of specific problem features or changes in the nature of the task (e.g., prediction vs. explanation) prompted several students to change their mental model or to add a different mental representation. Our study indicates that properly diversifying and sequencing the types of academic tasks in which students are asked to participate could better foster meaningful learning as different types of cognitive resources may be activated by different students, and thus shared, analyzed, and discussed.

KW - chemistry

KW - college education

KW - explanations

KW - mental models

KW - reasoning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952775145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952775145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/tea.20407

DO - 10.1002/tea.20407

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79952775145

VL - 48

SP - 396

EP - 413

JO - Journal of Research in Science Teaching

JF - Journal of Research in Science Teaching

SN - 0022-4308

IS - 4

ER -