Comment on "The illusion of invariant quantities in life histories".

Van M. Savage, Ethan P. White, Melanie E. Moses, S. K.Morgan Ernest, Brian J. Enquist, Eric L. Charnov

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Nee et al. (Reports, 19 August 2005, p. 1236) used a null model to argue that life history invariants are illusions. We show that their results are largely inconsequential for life history theory because the authors confound two definitions of invariance, and rigorous analysis of their null model demonstrates that it does not match observed data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)198; author reply 198
JournalScience
Volume312
Issue number5771
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 14 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on "The illusion of invariant quantities in life histories".'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this