Commentary for special issue of journal of memory and language

Generalizability theory analysis for psycholinguistic applications

Aurelio J Figueredo, Sally Olderbak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We propose that the continuing controversies over the use of quasi-F-ratios in psycholinguistic research might be circumvented, if not resolved, by the judicious application of Generalizability Theory (GT) analyses. We argue that GT is a logical extension of the basic rationale behind repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and the variance components model upon which GT is ultimately based and upon which the entire logic of the F-ratio (quasi or otherwise) rests. GT is especially useful in psycholinguistics research because it affords one the opportunity to assess generalizability across multiple dimensions within the same model, such as individual subjects as well as varying conditions of prime and target words. We will provide an illustrative example of GT based on Forster's (2007) replication of Davis and Lupker's (2006) study in which they tested the effects of frequency discrepancies in target and prime words across individual subjects under varying combinations of frequency and prime.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)426-433
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume59
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint

Psycholinguistics
language theory
psycholinguistics
Language
Data storage equipment
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Research
Analysis of Variance
analysis of variance
Generalizability Theory

Keywords

  • Generalizability theory
  • Null hypothesis significance testing
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Quasi-F-ratios
  • Random effects models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

@article{ece14879537d4ee49196c6f74ed2683e,
title = "Commentary for special issue of journal of memory and language: Generalizability theory analysis for psycholinguistic applications",
abstract = "We propose that the continuing controversies over the use of quasi-F-ratios in psycholinguistic research might be circumvented, if not resolved, by the judicious application of Generalizability Theory (GT) analyses. We argue that GT is a logical extension of the basic rationale behind repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and the variance components model upon which GT is ultimately based and upon which the entire logic of the F-ratio (quasi or otherwise) rests. GT is especially useful in psycholinguistics research because it affords one the opportunity to assess generalizability across multiple dimensions within the same model, such as individual subjects as well as varying conditions of prime and target words. We will provide an illustrative example of GT based on Forster's (2007) replication of Davis and Lupker's (2006) study in which they tested the effects of frequency discrepancies in target and prime words across individual subjects under varying combinations of frequency and prime.",
keywords = "Generalizability theory, Null hypothesis significance testing, Psycholinguistics, Quasi-F-ratios, Random effects models",
author = "Figueredo, {Aurelio J} and Sally Olderbak",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2008.07.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "426--433",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary for special issue of journal of memory and language

T2 - Generalizability theory analysis for psycholinguistic applications

AU - Figueredo, Aurelio J

AU - Olderbak, Sally

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - We propose that the continuing controversies over the use of quasi-F-ratios in psycholinguistic research might be circumvented, if not resolved, by the judicious application of Generalizability Theory (GT) analyses. We argue that GT is a logical extension of the basic rationale behind repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and the variance components model upon which GT is ultimately based and upon which the entire logic of the F-ratio (quasi or otherwise) rests. GT is especially useful in psycholinguistics research because it affords one the opportunity to assess generalizability across multiple dimensions within the same model, such as individual subjects as well as varying conditions of prime and target words. We will provide an illustrative example of GT based on Forster's (2007) replication of Davis and Lupker's (2006) study in which they tested the effects of frequency discrepancies in target and prime words across individual subjects under varying combinations of frequency and prime.

AB - We propose that the continuing controversies over the use of quasi-F-ratios in psycholinguistic research might be circumvented, if not resolved, by the judicious application of Generalizability Theory (GT) analyses. We argue that GT is a logical extension of the basic rationale behind repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and the variance components model upon which GT is ultimately based and upon which the entire logic of the F-ratio (quasi or otherwise) rests. GT is especially useful in psycholinguistics research because it affords one the opportunity to assess generalizability across multiple dimensions within the same model, such as individual subjects as well as varying conditions of prime and target words. We will provide an illustrative example of GT based on Forster's (2007) replication of Davis and Lupker's (2006) study in which they tested the effects of frequency discrepancies in target and prime words across individual subjects under varying combinations of frequency and prime.

KW - Generalizability theory

KW - Null hypothesis significance testing

KW - Psycholinguistics

KW - Quasi-F-ratios

KW - Random effects models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55649107947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55649107947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2008.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2008.07.004

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 426

EP - 433

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

IS - 4

ER -