Commitment to legal claiming: Influences of attributions, social guidance, and organizational tenure

Markus Groth, Barry M Goldman, Stephen W Gilliland, Robert J. Bies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study investigates antecedents of individuals' commitment to the legal-claiming process. Individuals were surveyed as they entered a district office of the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to file an employment discrimination claim. Respondents' attributions regarding who they blamed for their grievance, the social guidance received, their organizational tenure, and their commitment to legal claiming were assessed. Results showed that individuals who made strong external attributions had a higher commitment to legal claiming than did those who made weak external attributions. Social guidance and organizational tenure were significant moderators of the attribution-claiming relationship. Specifically, commitment to legal claiming was more strongly related to external attributions when social guidance was low and organizational tenure was high. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)781-788
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume87
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Commitment to legal claiming : Influences of attributions, social guidance, and organizational tenure. / Groth, Markus; Goldman, Barry M; Gilliland, Stephen W; Bies, Robert J.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, No. 4, 08.2002, p. 781-788.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f8de263c2a7340a5ababf204b363d2a6,
title = "Commitment to legal claiming: Influences of attributions, social guidance, and organizational tenure",
abstract = "This study investigates antecedents of individuals' commitment to the legal-claiming process. Individuals were surveyed as they entered a district office of the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to file an employment discrimination claim. Respondents' attributions regarding who they blamed for their grievance, the social guidance received, their organizational tenure, and their commitment to legal claiming were assessed. Results showed that individuals who made strong external attributions had a higher commitment to legal claiming than did those who made weak external attributions. Social guidance and organizational tenure were significant moderators of the attribution-claiming relationship. Specifically, commitment to legal claiming was more strongly related to external attributions when social guidance was low and organizational tenure was high. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.",
author = "Markus Groth and Goldman, {Barry M} and Gilliland, {Stephen W} and Bies, {Robert J.}",
year = "2002",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.781",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "781--788",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commitment to legal claiming

T2 - Influences of attributions, social guidance, and organizational tenure

AU - Groth, Markus

AU - Goldman, Barry M

AU - Gilliland, Stephen W

AU - Bies, Robert J.

PY - 2002/8

Y1 - 2002/8

N2 - This study investigates antecedents of individuals' commitment to the legal-claiming process. Individuals were surveyed as they entered a district office of the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to file an employment discrimination claim. Respondents' attributions regarding who they blamed for their grievance, the social guidance received, their organizational tenure, and their commitment to legal claiming were assessed. Results showed that individuals who made strong external attributions had a higher commitment to legal claiming than did those who made weak external attributions. Social guidance and organizational tenure were significant moderators of the attribution-claiming relationship. Specifically, commitment to legal claiming was more strongly related to external attributions when social guidance was low and organizational tenure was high. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

AB - This study investigates antecedents of individuals' commitment to the legal-claiming process. Individuals were surveyed as they entered a district office of the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to file an employment discrimination claim. Respondents' attributions regarding who they blamed for their grievance, the social guidance received, their organizational tenure, and their commitment to legal claiming were assessed. Results showed that individuals who made strong external attributions had a higher commitment to legal claiming than did those who made weak external attributions. Social guidance and organizational tenure were significant moderators of the attribution-claiming relationship. Specifically, commitment to legal claiming was more strongly related to external attributions when social guidance was low and organizational tenure was high. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036667297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036667297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.781

DO - 10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.781

M3 - Article

C2 - 12184580

VL - 87

SP - 781

EP - 788

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 4

ER -