COMMON PROPERTY AS AN INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABILITY

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Relationships between the potential productivity of land and property rights generally are couched in terms of measures of central tendency or means. However, risk or variance as a measure of uncertainty also is critical in relating property rights and organizational arrangements developed within various property regimes. Meteorological and hydrological research results support the appropriateness of risk‐spreading property regimes, especially in semi‐arid and arid lands. Spatial diversification models indicate that common property regimes can be a rational response to environmental variability. Efforts by the public sector to privatize and fence grazing lands on the extensive margin may have limited appeal to pastoralists throughout the world.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)10-21
Number of pages12
JournalContemporary Economic Policy
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

common property
right of ownership
regime
research results
diversification
appeal
public sector
productivity
uncertainty
Common property
Property rights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Public Administration

Cite this

COMMON PROPERTY AS AN INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABILITY. / Thompson, Gary D; Wilson, Paul N.

In: Contemporary Economic Policy, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1994, p. 10-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{91de1e8449a6469a896d8cebf9a8efcc,
title = "COMMON PROPERTY AS AN INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABILITY",
abstract = "Relationships between the potential productivity of land and property rights generally are couched in terms of measures of central tendency or means. However, risk or variance as a measure of uncertainty also is critical in relating property rights and organizational arrangements developed within various property regimes. Meteorological and hydrological research results support the appropriateness of risk‐spreading property regimes, especially in semi‐arid and arid lands. Spatial diversification models indicate that common property regimes can be a rational response to environmental variability. Efforts by the public sector to privatize and fence grazing lands on the extensive margin may have limited appeal to pastoralists throughout the world.",
author = "Thompson, {Gary D} and Wilson, {Paul N}",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1111/j.1465-7287.1994.tb00430.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "10--21",
journal = "Contemporary Economic Policy",
issn = "1074-3529",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - COMMON PROPERTY AS AN INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABILITY

AU - Thompson, Gary D

AU - Wilson, Paul N

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Relationships between the potential productivity of land and property rights generally are couched in terms of measures of central tendency or means. However, risk or variance as a measure of uncertainty also is critical in relating property rights and organizational arrangements developed within various property regimes. Meteorological and hydrological research results support the appropriateness of risk‐spreading property regimes, especially in semi‐arid and arid lands. Spatial diversification models indicate that common property regimes can be a rational response to environmental variability. Efforts by the public sector to privatize and fence grazing lands on the extensive margin may have limited appeal to pastoralists throughout the world.

AB - Relationships between the potential productivity of land and property rights generally are couched in terms of measures of central tendency or means. However, risk or variance as a measure of uncertainty also is critical in relating property rights and organizational arrangements developed within various property regimes. Meteorological and hydrological research results support the appropriateness of risk‐spreading property regimes, especially in semi‐arid and arid lands. Spatial diversification models indicate that common property regimes can be a rational response to environmental variability. Efforts by the public sector to privatize and fence grazing lands on the extensive margin may have limited appeal to pastoralists throughout the world.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85005327214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85005327214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1994.tb00430.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1994.tb00430.x

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 10

EP - 21

JO - Contemporary Economic Policy

JF - Contemporary Economic Policy

SN - 1074-3529

IS - 3

ER -