Comparative validity of three english oral language proficiency tests

Fredrick A. Schrank, Todd V Fletcher, Criselda Guajardo Alvarado

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The validity of three English oral language proficiency tests was examined in terms of Cummin’s BICS/CALP distinction. The tests studied included the Idea Oral Language Proficiency Test (IPT-I; Ballard, Tighe, and Dalton, 1989), the Language Assessment Scales (LAS; De Avila and Duncan,), and the Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery--Revised (WLPB-R:Woodcock, 1991). An examination of test content and pattern of correlations between subscales is used to describe the way oral language proficiency has been conceptualized and operationalized for each of the three oral language proficiency tests. These three tests measure similar and dissimilar aspects of oral language proficiency. Some of the similar and dissimilar aspects support the BICS/CALP distinction. Implications for evaluating oral language proficiency tests are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-68
Number of pages14
JournalBilingual Research Journal
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996

Fingerprint

language
Language Proficiency
Oral Language
examination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Comparative validity of three english oral language proficiency tests. / Schrank, Fredrick A.; Fletcher, Todd V; Alvarado, Criselda Guajardo.

In: Bilingual Research Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1996, p. 55-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schrank, Fredrick A. ; Fletcher, Todd V ; Alvarado, Criselda Guajardo. / Comparative validity of three english oral language proficiency tests. In: Bilingual Research Journal. 1996 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 55-68.
@article{a8a1c1e1eaa34b2585bb0b7287006daa,
title = "Comparative validity of three english oral language proficiency tests",
abstract = "The validity of three English oral language proficiency tests was examined in terms of Cummin’s BICS/CALP distinction. The tests studied included the Idea Oral Language Proficiency Test (IPT-I; Ballard, Tighe, and Dalton, 1989), the Language Assessment Scales (LAS; De Avila and Duncan,), and the Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery--Revised (WLPB-R:Woodcock, 1991). An examination of test content and pattern of correlations between subscales is used to describe the way oral language proficiency has been conceptualized and operationalized for each of the three oral language proficiency tests. These three tests measure similar and dissimilar aspects of oral language proficiency. Some of the similar and dissimilar aspects support the BICS/CALP distinction. Implications for evaluating oral language proficiency tests are discussed.",
author = "Schrank, {Fredrick A.} and Fletcher, {Todd V} and Alvarado, {Criselda Guajardo}",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1080/15235882.1996.10668620",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "55--68",
journal = "Bilingual Research Journal",
issn = "1523-5882",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative validity of three english oral language proficiency tests

AU - Schrank, Fredrick A.

AU - Fletcher, Todd V

AU - Alvarado, Criselda Guajardo

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - The validity of three English oral language proficiency tests was examined in terms of Cummin’s BICS/CALP distinction. The tests studied included the Idea Oral Language Proficiency Test (IPT-I; Ballard, Tighe, and Dalton, 1989), the Language Assessment Scales (LAS; De Avila and Duncan,), and the Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery--Revised (WLPB-R:Woodcock, 1991). An examination of test content and pattern of correlations between subscales is used to describe the way oral language proficiency has been conceptualized and operationalized for each of the three oral language proficiency tests. These three tests measure similar and dissimilar aspects of oral language proficiency. Some of the similar and dissimilar aspects support the BICS/CALP distinction. Implications for evaluating oral language proficiency tests are discussed.

AB - The validity of three English oral language proficiency tests was examined in terms of Cummin’s BICS/CALP distinction. The tests studied included the Idea Oral Language Proficiency Test (IPT-I; Ballard, Tighe, and Dalton, 1989), the Language Assessment Scales (LAS; De Avila and Duncan,), and the Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery--Revised (WLPB-R:Woodcock, 1991). An examination of test content and pattern of correlations between subscales is used to describe the way oral language proficiency has been conceptualized and operationalized for each of the three oral language proficiency tests. These three tests measure similar and dissimilar aspects of oral language proficiency. Some of the similar and dissimilar aspects support the BICS/CALP distinction. Implications for evaluating oral language proficiency tests are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011180266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011180266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15235882.1996.10668620

DO - 10.1080/15235882.1996.10668620

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85011180266

VL - 20

SP - 55

EP - 68

JO - Bilingual Research Journal

JF - Bilingual Research Journal

SN - 1523-5882

IS - 1

ER -