Comparison of methods for converting Dylos particle number concentrations to PM2.5 mass concentrations

Remy Franken, Thomas Maggos, Asimina Stamatelopoulou, Miranda M Loh, Eelco Kuijpers, John Bartzis, Suzanne Steinle, John W. Cherrie, Anjoeka Pronk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to (a) develop a method for converting particle number concentrations (PNC) obtained by Dylos to PM2.5 mass concentrations, (b) compare this conversion with similar methods available in the literature, and (c) compare Dylos PM2.5 obtained using all available conversion methods with gravimetric samples. Data were collected in multiple residences in three European countries using the Dylos and an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS, TSI) in the Netherlands or an optical particle counter (OPC, GRIMM) in Greece. Two statistical fitted curves were developed based on Dylos PNC and either an APS or an OPC particle mass concentrations (PMC). In addition, at the homes of 16 volunteers (UK and Netherlands), Dylos measurements were collected along with gravimetric samples. The Dylos PNC were transformed to PMC using all the fitted curves obtained during this study (and three found in the literature) and were compared with gravimetric samples. The method developed in the present study using an OPC showed the highest correlation (Pearson (R) = 0.63, Concordance (ρ c ) = 0.61) with gravimetric data. The other methods resulted in an underestimation of PMC compared to gravimetric measurements (R = 0.65-0.55, ρ c  = 0.51-0.24). In conclusion, estimation of PM2.5 concentrations using the Dylos is acceptable for indicative purposes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalIndoor Air
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiation counters
Aerodynamics
Netherlands
Greece
Volunteers

Keywords

  • aerodynamic particle sizer
  • conversion
  • Dylos
  • mass concentration
  • optical particle counter
  • particle number concentration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Comparison of methods for converting Dylos particle number concentrations to PM2.5 mass concentrations. / Franken, Remy; Maggos, Thomas; Stamatelopoulou, Asimina; Loh, Miranda M; Kuijpers, Eelco; Bartzis, John; Steinle, Suzanne; Cherrie, John W.; Pronk, Anjoeka.

In: Indoor Air, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Franken, R, Maggos, T, Stamatelopoulou, A, Loh, MM, Kuijpers, E, Bartzis, J, Steinle, S, Cherrie, JW & Pronk, A 2019, 'Comparison of methods for converting Dylos particle number concentrations to PM2.5 mass concentrations', Indoor Air. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12546
Franken, Remy ; Maggos, Thomas ; Stamatelopoulou, Asimina ; Loh, Miranda M ; Kuijpers, Eelco ; Bartzis, John ; Steinle, Suzanne ; Cherrie, John W. ; Pronk, Anjoeka. / Comparison of methods for converting Dylos particle number concentrations to PM2.5 mass concentrations. In: Indoor Air. 2019.
@article{7902d59e60d543bba59d47f7696744ce,
title = "Comparison of methods for converting Dylos particle number concentrations to PM2.5 mass concentrations",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to (a) develop a method for converting particle number concentrations (PNC) obtained by Dylos to PM2.5 mass concentrations, (b) compare this conversion with similar methods available in the literature, and (c) compare Dylos PM2.5 obtained using all available conversion methods with gravimetric samples. Data were collected in multiple residences in three European countries using the Dylos and an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS, TSI) in the Netherlands or an optical particle counter (OPC, GRIMM) in Greece. Two statistical fitted curves were developed based on Dylos PNC and either an APS or an OPC particle mass concentrations (PMC). In addition, at the homes of 16 volunteers (UK and Netherlands), Dylos measurements were collected along with gravimetric samples. The Dylos PNC were transformed to PMC using all the fitted curves obtained during this study (and three found in the literature) and were compared with gravimetric samples. The method developed in the present study using an OPC showed the highest correlation (Pearson (R) = 0.63, Concordance (ρ c ) = 0.61) with gravimetric data. The other methods resulted in an underestimation of PMC compared to gravimetric measurements (R = 0.65-0.55, ρ c  = 0.51-0.24). In conclusion, estimation of PM2.5 concentrations using the Dylos is acceptable for indicative purposes.",
keywords = "aerodynamic particle sizer, conversion, Dylos, mass concentration, optical particle counter, particle number concentration",
author = "Remy Franken and Thomas Maggos and Asimina Stamatelopoulou and Loh, {Miranda M} and Eelco Kuijpers and John Bartzis and Suzanne Steinle and Cherrie, {John W.} and Anjoeka Pronk",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ina.12546",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Indoor Air",
issn = "0905-6947",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of methods for converting Dylos particle number concentrations to PM2.5 mass concentrations

AU - Franken, Remy

AU - Maggos, Thomas

AU - Stamatelopoulou, Asimina

AU - Loh, Miranda M

AU - Kuijpers, Eelco

AU - Bartzis, John

AU - Steinle, Suzanne

AU - Cherrie, John W.

AU - Pronk, Anjoeka

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to (a) develop a method for converting particle number concentrations (PNC) obtained by Dylos to PM2.5 mass concentrations, (b) compare this conversion with similar methods available in the literature, and (c) compare Dylos PM2.5 obtained using all available conversion methods with gravimetric samples. Data were collected in multiple residences in three European countries using the Dylos and an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS, TSI) in the Netherlands or an optical particle counter (OPC, GRIMM) in Greece. Two statistical fitted curves were developed based on Dylos PNC and either an APS or an OPC particle mass concentrations (PMC). In addition, at the homes of 16 volunteers (UK and Netherlands), Dylos measurements were collected along with gravimetric samples. The Dylos PNC were transformed to PMC using all the fitted curves obtained during this study (and three found in the literature) and were compared with gravimetric samples. The method developed in the present study using an OPC showed the highest correlation (Pearson (R) = 0.63, Concordance (ρ c ) = 0.61) with gravimetric data. The other methods resulted in an underestimation of PMC compared to gravimetric measurements (R = 0.65-0.55, ρ c  = 0.51-0.24). In conclusion, estimation of PM2.5 concentrations using the Dylos is acceptable for indicative purposes.

AB - The aim of this study was to (a) develop a method for converting particle number concentrations (PNC) obtained by Dylos to PM2.5 mass concentrations, (b) compare this conversion with similar methods available in the literature, and (c) compare Dylos PM2.5 obtained using all available conversion methods with gravimetric samples. Data were collected in multiple residences in three European countries using the Dylos and an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS, TSI) in the Netherlands or an optical particle counter (OPC, GRIMM) in Greece. Two statistical fitted curves were developed based on Dylos PNC and either an APS or an OPC particle mass concentrations (PMC). In addition, at the homes of 16 volunteers (UK and Netherlands), Dylos measurements were collected along with gravimetric samples. The Dylos PNC were transformed to PMC using all the fitted curves obtained during this study (and three found in the literature) and were compared with gravimetric samples. The method developed in the present study using an OPC showed the highest correlation (Pearson (R) = 0.63, Concordance (ρ c ) = 0.61) with gravimetric data. The other methods resulted in an underestimation of PMC compared to gravimetric measurements (R = 0.65-0.55, ρ c  = 0.51-0.24). In conclusion, estimation of PM2.5 concentrations using the Dylos is acceptable for indicative purposes.

KW - aerodynamic particle sizer

KW - conversion

KW - Dylos

KW - mass concentration

KW - optical particle counter

KW - particle number concentration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063318016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063318016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ina.12546

DO - 10.1111/ina.12546

M3 - Article

JO - Indoor Air

JF - Indoor Air

SN - 0905-6947

ER -