Comparison of precipitation observed over the continental United States to that simulated by a climate model

Mingxuan Chen, Robert E. Dickinson, Xubin Zeng, Andrea N. Hahmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compares monthly average frequency, intensity, and amount of hourly precipitation simulated by National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model version 2/Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme to the smoothed estimates of those observed locally over the continental United States. The observed monthly intensities vary from less than 1 to 5 mm h-1, with lowest values in the winter in northern midcontinent and highest around the Gulf Coast in summer. Model intensities are on the average 3-4 times less when drizzle is excluded and an order of magnitude less when drizzle is included. As might be anticipated, relative frequencies are much too high and intensities much too low in the model fields, compared to those observed. The spatial pattern of these quantities and the total precipitation are more realistic. The study also compares extreme events and diurnal and seasonal variations and finds that, in general, the simulated precipitation has larger spatial variability, larger diurnal variation, and longer maximum continuous wet and dry periods than those observed. These discrepancies are largely due to the different nature of model (area averaged) precipitation and observed (local) precipitation. Therefore, the use of GCM output to directly represent local values of intensities and frequencies may lead to large errors in the coupling of the land surface to the atmosphere above it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2233-2249
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Climate
Volume9
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1996

Fingerprint

drizzle
climate modeling
diurnal variation
Biosphere 2
atmosphere
extreme event
general circulation model
land surface
seasonal variation
coast
winter
summer
comparison
gulf

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Comparison of precipitation observed over the continental United States to that simulated by a climate model. / Chen, Mingxuan; Dickinson, Robert E.; Zeng, Xubin; Hahmann, Andrea N.

In: Journal of Climate, Vol. 9, No. 9, 09.1996, p. 2233-2249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, Mingxuan ; Dickinson, Robert E. ; Zeng, Xubin ; Hahmann, Andrea N. / Comparison of precipitation observed over the continental United States to that simulated by a climate model. In: Journal of Climate. 1996 ; Vol. 9, No. 9. pp. 2233-2249.
@article{7dc7171014954c9daae0f2b3e8ab9c9b,
title = "Comparison of precipitation observed over the continental United States to that simulated by a climate model",
abstract = "This study compares monthly average frequency, intensity, and amount of hourly precipitation simulated by National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model version 2/Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme to the smoothed estimates of those observed locally over the continental United States. The observed monthly intensities vary from less than 1 to 5 mm h-1, with lowest values in the winter in northern midcontinent and highest around the Gulf Coast in summer. Model intensities are on the average 3-4 times less when drizzle is excluded and an order of magnitude less when drizzle is included. As might be anticipated, relative frequencies are much too high and intensities much too low in the model fields, compared to those observed. The spatial pattern of these quantities and the total precipitation are more realistic. The study also compares extreme events and diurnal and seasonal variations and finds that, in general, the simulated precipitation has larger spatial variability, larger diurnal variation, and longer maximum continuous wet and dry periods than those observed. These discrepancies are largely due to the different nature of model (area averaged) precipitation and observed (local) precipitation. Therefore, the use of GCM output to directly represent local values of intensities and frequencies may lead to large errors in the coupling of the land surface to the atmosphere above it.",
author = "Mingxuan Chen and Dickinson, {Robert E.} and Xubin Zeng and Hahmann, {Andrea N.}",
year = "1996",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "2233--2249",
journal = "Journal of Climate",
issn = "0894-8755",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of precipitation observed over the continental United States to that simulated by a climate model

AU - Chen, Mingxuan

AU - Dickinson, Robert E.

AU - Zeng, Xubin

AU - Hahmann, Andrea N.

PY - 1996/9

Y1 - 1996/9

N2 - This study compares monthly average frequency, intensity, and amount of hourly precipitation simulated by National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model version 2/Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme to the smoothed estimates of those observed locally over the continental United States. The observed monthly intensities vary from less than 1 to 5 mm h-1, with lowest values in the winter in northern midcontinent and highest around the Gulf Coast in summer. Model intensities are on the average 3-4 times less when drizzle is excluded and an order of magnitude less when drizzle is included. As might be anticipated, relative frequencies are much too high and intensities much too low in the model fields, compared to those observed. The spatial pattern of these quantities and the total precipitation are more realistic. The study also compares extreme events and diurnal and seasonal variations and finds that, in general, the simulated precipitation has larger spatial variability, larger diurnal variation, and longer maximum continuous wet and dry periods than those observed. These discrepancies are largely due to the different nature of model (area averaged) precipitation and observed (local) precipitation. Therefore, the use of GCM output to directly represent local values of intensities and frequencies may lead to large errors in the coupling of the land surface to the atmosphere above it.

AB - This study compares monthly average frequency, intensity, and amount of hourly precipitation simulated by National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model version 2/Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme to the smoothed estimates of those observed locally over the continental United States. The observed monthly intensities vary from less than 1 to 5 mm h-1, with lowest values in the winter in northern midcontinent and highest around the Gulf Coast in summer. Model intensities are on the average 3-4 times less when drizzle is excluded and an order of magnitude less when drizzle is included. As might be anticipated, relative frequencies are much too high and intensities much too low in the model fields, compared to those observed. The spatial pattern of these quantities and the total precipitation are more realistic. The study also compares extreme events and diurnal and seasonal variations and finds that, in general, the simulated precipitation has larger spatial variability, larger diurnal variation, and longer maximum continuous wet and dry periods than those observed. These discrepancies are largely due to the different nature of model (area averaged) precipitation and observed (local) precipitation. Therefore, the use of GCM output to directly represent local values of intensities and frequencies may lead to large errors in the coupling of the land surface to the atmosphere above it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030356978&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030356978&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030356978

VL - 9

SP - 2233

EP - 2249

JO - Journal of Climate

JF - Journal of Climate

SN - 0894-8755

IS - 9

ER -