Comparison of riparian evapotranspiration estimates based on a water balance approach and sap flow measurements

R. D. Mac Nish, C. L. Unkrich, Evelyn Smythe, D. C. Goodrich, Thomas Maddock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Estimates of evapotranspiration (ET) from riparian vegetation along a 122m reach of the San Pedro River using both a water balance approach and by scaling up sap flow measurements are compared. A sensitivity analysis was performed on the components of the water balance to assess the effects of measurement errors on estimates of ET using this method. It was concluded that by reducing the error in three key components to less than 5%, riparian ET could be estimated to an accuracy of 20-25% using the water balance method. The analysis also indicated that random measurement errors up to 10% in the water balance measurements would explain the difference between the water balance and sap flow ET estimates. Demonstrating agreement given reasonable error bounds provides confidence in the accuracy of both methods. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)271-279
Number of pages9
JournalAgricultural and Forest Meteorology
Volume105
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 20 2000

Fingerprint

sap flow
flow measurement
water balance
evapotranspiration
water budget
riparian vegetation
sensitivity analysis
methodology
comparison
vegetation
rivers
river
method

Keywords

  • Evapotranspiration
  • Groundwater
  • Riparian
  • San Pedro River
  • Sap flow
  • Water balance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Comparison of riparian evapotranspiration estimates based on a water balance approach and sap flow measurements. / Mac Nish, R. D.; Unkrich, C. L.; Smythe, Evelyn; Goodrich, D. C.; Maddock, Thomas.

In: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 105, No. 1-3, 20.11.2000, p. 271-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mac Nish, R. D. ; Unkrich, C. L. ; Smythe, Evelyn ; Goodrich, D. C. ; Maddock, Thomas. / Comparison of riparian evapotranspiration estimates based on a water balance approach and sap flow measurements. In: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2000 ; Vol. 105, No. 1-3. pp. 271-279.
@article{dc1ae507a1ab4241832cea943131c904,
title = "Comparison of riparian evapotranspiration estimates based on a water balance approach and sap flow measurements",
abstract = "Estimates of evapotranspiration (ET) from riparian vegetation along a 122m reach of the San Pedro River using both a water balance approach and by scaling up sap flow measurements are compared. A sensitivity analysis was performed on the components of the water balance to assess the effects of measurement errors on estimates of ET using this method. It was concluded that by reducing the error in three key components to less than 5{\%}, riparian ET could be estimated to an accuracy of 20-25{\%} using the water balance method. The analysis also indicated that random measurement errors up to 10{\%} in the water balance measurements would explain the difference between the water balance and sap flow ET estimates. Demonstrating agreement given reasonable error bounds provides confidence in the accuracy of both methods. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.",
keywords = "Evapotranspiration, Groundwater, Riparian, San Pedro River, Sap flow, Water balance",
author = "{Mac Nish}, {R. D.} and Unkrich, {C. L.} and Evelyn Smythe and Goodrich, {D. C.} and Thomas Maddock",
year = "2000",
month = "11",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00196-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "271--279",
journal = "Agricultural and Forest Meteorology",
issn = "0168-1923",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of riparian evapotranspiration estimates based on a water balance approach and sap flow measurements

AU - Mac Nish, R. D.

AU - Unkrich, C. L.

AU - Smythe, Evelyn

AU - Goodrich, D. C.

AU - Maddock, Thomas

PY - 2000/11/20

Y1 - 2000/11/20

N2 - Estimates of evapotranspiration (ET) from riparian vegetation along a 122m reach of the San Pedro River using both a water balance approach and by scaling up sap flow measurements are compared. A sensitivity analysis was performed on the components of the water balance to assess the effects of measurement errors on estimates of ET using this method. It was concluded that by reducing the error in three key components to less than 5%, riparian ET could be estimated to an accuracy of 20-25% using the water balance method. The analysis also indicated that random measurement errors up to 10% in the water balance measurements would explain the difference between the water balance and sap flow ET estimates. Demonstrating agreement given reasonable error bounds provides confidence in the accuracy of both methods. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

AB - Estimates of evapotranspiration (ET) from riparian vegetation along a 122m reach of the San Pedro River using both a water balance approach and by scaling up sap flow measurements are compared. A sensitivity analysis was performed on the components of the water balance to assess the effects of measurement errors on estimates of ET using this method. It was concluded that by reducing the error in three key components to less than 5%, riparian ET could be estimated to an accuracy of 20-25% using the water balance method. The analysis also indicated that random measurement errors up to 10% in the water balance measurements would explain the difference between the water balance and sap flow ET estimates. Demonstrating agreement given reasonable error bounds provides confidence in the accuracy of both methods. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

KW - Evapotranspiration

KW - Groundwater

KW - Riparian

KW - San Pedro River

KW - Sap flow

KW - Water balance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034693674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034693674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00196-9

DO - 10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00196-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034693674

VL - 105

SP - 271

EP - 279

JO - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

JF - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

SN - 0168-1923

IS - 1-3

ER -