Comparison of slow sand filtration and microfiltration as pretreatments for inland desalination via reverse osmosis

Andrea F. Corral, Umur Yenal, Roy Strickle, Dongxu Yan, Eric Holler, Chris Hill, Wendell P. Ela, Robert G. Arnold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

A pilot study was conducted from October 2007 to November 2010 to establish the long-term feasibility of using reverse osmosis (RO) treatment to manage salt levels in Central Arizona Project water. Pretreatments consisting of microfiltration (MF) and slow sand filtration (SSF) were compared based on performance-turbidity removal, silt density index (SDI), volume treated between cleaning events and protection of downstream RO-during side-by-side operation over a yearlong period. SSF always produced feed water that was suitable for RO treatment (SDI. <. 5). However, MF consistently provided filtrate with SDI. <. 3, and long-term RO performance improved significantly with MF as pretreatment. Although the economic costs of MF and SSF pretreatments are similar; MF is preferred based on the quality of treated water and stability of downstream RO operation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalDesalination
Volume334
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 3 2014

Keywords

  • Desalination
  • Economic analysis
  • Microfiltration
  • Silt density index
  • Slow sand filtration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Mechanical Engineering

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of slow sand filtration and microfiltration as pretreatments for inland desalination via reverse osmosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this