Comparison of standard and abbreviated distortion product otoacoustic emissions procedures.

Frank Musiek, J. A. Baran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Standard and abbreviated distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) procedures derived using the Grason Stadler Model 60 instrument were compared. The standard and abbreviated procedures were compared at frequencies of 1000, 1250, 1593, 2000, 2531, and 3187 Hz for 48 ears from 28 subjects. The subject pool included individuals with normal hearing and those with sensorineural hearing loss. The abbreviated procedure correlated well with the standard procedure for DPOAE amplitude cross all frequencies tested. The two procedures were also highly similar in categorizing the subjects in regard to normal or abnormal hearing sensitivity. It appears that the shorter analysis time for the abbreviated procedure had little effect on its accuracy. Although the abbreviated procedure has an obvious frequency limitation, it may have some clinical advantages for hearing screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)370-374
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Audiology
Volume7
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hearing
Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Ear

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Comparison of standard and abbreviated distortion product otoacoustic emissions procedures. / Musiek, Frank; Baran, J. A.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Vol. 7, No. 5, 10.1996, p. 370-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{86355e6caa164ac4830296257bbdc103,
title = "Comparison of standard and abbreviated distortion product otoacoustic emissions procedures.",
abstract = "Standard and abbreviated distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) procedures derived using the Grason Stadler Model 60 instrument were compared. The standard and abbreviated procedures were compared at frequencies of 1000, 1250, 1593, 2000, 2531, and 3187 Hz for 48 ears from 28 subjects. The subject pool included individuals with normal hearing and those with sensorineural hearing loss. The abbreviated procedure correlated well with the standard procedure for DPOAE amplitude cross all frequencies tested. The two procedures were also highly similar in categorizing the subjects in regard to normal or abnormal hearing sensitivity. It appears that the shorter analysis time for the abbreviated procedure had little effect on its accuracy. Although the abbreviated procedure has an obvious frequency limitation, it may have some clinical advantages for hearing screening.",
author = "Frank Musiek and Baran, {J. A.}",
year = "1996",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "370--374",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Audiology",
issn = "1050-0545",
publisher = "American Academy of Audiology",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of standard and abbreviated distortion product otoacoustic emissions procedures.

AU - Musiek, Frank

AU - Baran, J. A.

PY - 1996/10

Y1 - 1996/10

N2 - Standard and abbreviated distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) procedures derived using the Grason Stadler Model 60 instrument were compared. The standard and abbreviated procedures were compared at frequencies of 1000, 1250, 1593, 2000, 2531, and 3187 Hz for 48 ears from 28 subjects. The subject pool included individuals with normal hearing and those with sensorineural hearing loss. The abbreviated procedure correlated well with the standard procedure for DPOAE amplitude cross all frequencies tested. The two procedures were also highly similar in categorizing the subjects in regard to normal or abnormal hearing sensitivity. It appears that the shorter analysis time for the abbreviated procedure had little effect on its accuracy. Although the abbreviated procedure has an obvious frequency limitation, it may have some clinical advantages for hearing screening.

AB - Standard and abbreviated distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) procedures derived using the Grason Stadler Model 60 instrument were compared. The standard and abbreviated procedures were compared at frequencies of 1000, 1250, 1593, 2000, 2531, and 3187 Hz for 48 ears from 28 subjects. The subject pool included individuals with normal hearing and those with sensorineural hearing loss. The abbreviated procedure correlated well with the standard procedure for DPOAE amplitude cross all frequencies tested. The two procedures were also highly similar in categorizing the subjects in regard to normal or abnormal hearing sensitivity. It appears that the shorter analysis time for the abbreviated procedure had little effect on its accuracy. Although the abbreviated procedure has an obvious frequency limitation, it may have some clinical advantages for hearing screening.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030253351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030253351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8898274

AN - SCOPUS:0030253351

VL - 7

SP - 370

EP - 374

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

SN - 1050-0545

IS - 5

ER -