Comparison of three respirator user training methods

Philip I Harber, Robert J. Boumis, Jing Su, Sarah Barrett, Gabriela Alongi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:: This study addresses methods for training respirator users, particularly when occupational health professionals are not immediately available. METHODS:: A randomized trial compared three training methods - printed brochure, video, and computer-based training - for two respirator types (filtering facepiece and a dual-cartridge half facemask). Quantitative fit testing (PortaCount) measured the effectiveness of training. The study included 226 subjects. RESULTS:: For both respirator types, video was significantly superior to either print or computer-based training methods. Conclusions were consistent, whether determined by average fit factor (analysis of variance), log-transformed fit factors, or the number of users in the lowest quartile of achieved fit. CONCLUSIONS:: Video training for proper respirator use can be effective when direct training from an occupational health professional is unavailable. These methods are particularly relevant to "rapid rollout" situations, such as natural disasters, epidemics, or bioterrorism concerns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1484-1488
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume55
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Mechanical Ventilators
Occupational Health
Bioterrorism
Pamphlets
Disasters
Statistical Factor Analysis
Analysis of Variance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Comparison of three respirator user training methods. / Harber, Philip I; Boumis, Robert J.; Su, Jing; Barrett, Sarah; Alongi, Gabriela.

In: Journal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 55, No. 12, 12.2013, p. 1484-1488.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{29ec985c3ec04deb93791ee359dc91bf,
title = "Comparison of three respirator user training methods",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE:: This study addresses methods for training respirator users, particularly when occupational health professionals are not immediately available. METHODS:: A randomized trial compared three training methods - printed brochure, video, and computer-based training - for two respirator types (filtering facepiece and a dual-cartridge half facemask). Quantitative fit testing (PortaCount) measured the effectiveness of training. The study included 226 subjects. RESULTS:: For both respirator types, video was significantly superior to either print or computer-based training methods. Conclusions were consistent, whether determined by average fit factor (analysis of variance), log-transformed fit factors, or the number of users in the lowest quartile of achieved fit. CONCLUSIONS:: Video training for proper respirator use can be effective when direct training from an occupational health professional is unavailable. These methods are particularly relevant to {"}rapid rollout{"} situations, such as natural disasters, epidemics, or bioterrorism concerns.",
author = "Harber, {Philip I} and Boumis, {Robert J.} and Jing Su and Sarah Barrett and Gabriela Alongi",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/JOM.0000000000000010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "1484--1488",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine",
issn = "1076-2752",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of three respirator user training methods

AU - Harber, Philip I

AU - Boumis, Robert J.

AU - Su, Jing

AU - Barrett, Sarah

AU - Alongi, Gabriela

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - OBJECTIVE:: This study addresses methods for training respirator users, particularly when occupational health professionals are not immediately available. METHODS:: A randomized trial compared three training methods - printed brochure, video, and computer-based training - for two respirator types (filtering facepiece and a dual-cartridge half facemask). Quantitative fit testing (PortaCount) measured the effectiveness of training. The study included 226 subjects. RESULTS:: For both respirator types, video was significantly superior to either print or computer-based training methods. Conclusions were consistent, whether determined by average fit factor (analysis of variance), log-transformed fit factors, or the number of users in the lowest quartile of achieved fit. CONCLUSIONS:: Video training for proper respirator use can be effective when direct training from an occupational health professional is unavailable. These methods are particularly relevant to "rapid rollout" situations, such as natural disasters, epidemics, or bioterrorism concerns.

AB - OBJECTIVE:: This study addresses methods for training respirator users, particularly when occupational health professionals are not immediately available. METHODS:: A randomized trial compared three training methods - printed brochure, video, and computer-based training - for two respirator types (filtering facepiece and a dual-cartridge half facemask). Quantitative fit testing (PortaCount) measured the effectiveness of training. The study included 226 subjects. RESULTS:: For both respirator types, video was significantly superior to either print or computer-based training methods. Conclusions were consistent, whether determined by average fit factor (analysis of variance), log-transformed fit factors, or the number of users in the lowest quartile of achieved fit. CONCLUSIONS:: Video training for proper respirator use can be effective when direct training from an occupational health professional is unavailable. These methods are particularly relevant to "rapid rollout" situations, such as natural disasters, epidemics, or bioterrorism concerns.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890572189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890572189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000010

DO - 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000010

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 1484

EP - 1488

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

SN - 1076-2752

IS - 12

ER -